Understanding Macros with No Carb Diet
edc58
Posts: 3 Member
I’m a recently retired college offensive lineman looking to shred my body fat and find a plan once I reach my goal weight of 260 lbs. I have a general understanding of macros but I would like to know what my goals should be percentage wise to reach a healthy caloric deficit.
1
Replies
-
I'm confused by this "no carb diet"
You're not going to eat fruits or veggies either?
Is this a doctor recommendation? Cause carbs do not cause weight gain and unless you plan to eat like this for the rest of your life, I would suggest rethinking your strategy6 -
What would a no carb diet consist of??
Just meat and oil??
Doesn't seem very nutritious.3 -
Oh ladies, be nice to the guy! He is new at this and, probably, slightly confused
Much more important facts would be how much weight is on the "table" for chopping, and whether there is any expectation for training and how much.
Also whether the past few months/weeks have seen weight moving up or down.
All this to start honing in on calories to eat and size of deficits that may be appropriate... before tackling macros and ways of eating!4 -
I thought I was nicely asking my question5
-
Upon seeing thread title:🍿4
-
I’m a recently retired college offensive lineman looking to shred my body fat and find a plan once I reach my goal weight of 260 lbs. I have a general understanding of macros but I would like to know what my goals should be percentage wise to reach a healthy caloric deficit.
@edc58 - we need more information. Current weight, height, age, and activity level. Like people above have said, you don't have to go low carb to lose weight. All you have to do to lose weight is create a calorie deficit. Within that deficit, you can set up your macros in whatever way works best for you.
As an athlete, I expect you want to maintain your muscle mass, and you probably plan to continue to workout, right? If those assumptions are true, I propose this. Set your protein macros to 0.8 to 1 gram per pound of your goal weight, so about 200-260 grams of protein per day. Protein is 4 calories per gram, so that's 800-1040 calories of your day. Fats need to be approximately .35 grams per pound of goal weight, so about 90 grams of fat per day. Fat is 9 calories per gram, so that's 810 calories per day. The rest of your daily calories can be carbs. I can't guess how much carbs, because I don't know the stats I listed above in bold.
Also, if you do plan to continue to workout, you'll need some carbs to fuel those workouts. Zero/low carb makes it difficult for most people to maximize their workouts.8 -
^^What quicksylver296 said.3
-
@PAV8888 -- I'm pretty sure 9 times out of 10 I'm pretty blunt but there is a niceness buried under it like a tootsie pop4
-
KrissFlavored wrote: »@PAV8888 -- I'm pretty sure 9 times out of 10 I'm pretty blunt but there is a niceness buried under it like a tootsie pop
Mmmm tootsie pop's are good!quiksylver296 wrote: »I’m a recently retired college offensive lineman looking to shred my body fat and find a plan once I reach my goal weight of 260 lbs. I have a general understanding of macros but I would like to know what my goals should be percentage wise to reach a healthy caloric deficit.
@edc58 - we need more information. Current weight, height, age, and activity level. Like people above have said, you don't have to go low carb to lose weight. All you have to do to lose weight is create a calorie deficit. Within that deficit, you can set up your macros in whatever way works best for you.
As an athlete, I expect you want to maintain your muscle mass, and you probably plan to continue to workout, right? If those assumptions are true, I propose this. Set your protein macros to 0.8 to 1 gram per pound of your goal weight, so about 200-260 grams of protein per day. Protein is 4 calories per gram, so that's 800-1040 calories of your day. Fats need to be approximately .35 grams per pound of goal weight, so about 90 grams of fat per day. Fat is 9 calories per gram, so that's 810 calories per day. The rest of your daily calories can be carbs. I can't guess how much carbs, because I don't know the stats I listed above in bold.
Also, if you do plan to continue to workout, you'll need some carbs to fuel those workouts. Zero/low carb makes it difficult for most people to maximize their workouts.
Adding to @quiksylver296 's post: the rest can be ANY of the macros, including carbs, fats, or even protein, or, even some discretionary alcohol if you're wired that way!
Fats at 0.35g would be a minimum and additional healthy fats would not be hurting you. Additional protein once you've hit 200-260g would probably be of little direct incremental benefit beyond providing satiation. And carbs can provide both energy and satiation and a whole lot of healthy food options.
However, while all this talk about macros is wonderful... the most BASIC questions remain: GOALS and CALORIES.4 -
thank you for the replies! As you all assumed I had no prior knowledge to anything diet. We were burning so many calories a day you could eat whatever and maintain a solid weight. I thought carbs were basically bread and starches but I was very wrong haha. I basically wanted to go meat and veggies. I have read a lot more on macros and what you suggested is almost exactly the plan I’ve set up. I’m aiming to meet my tde (no workouts included) of 2500kcal with 250g protein 200g carbs and 78g fats. That should put me at a decent caloric deficit. I’m 22 6’4” 300lbs looking to get to around 260lbs. I’m working out 4-5 days a week with high activity and interval bike training. I’ll try and keep updates. Thanks again for the reply and I’m always open to learning from peers.quiksylver296 wrote: »I’m a recently retired college offensive lineman looking to shred my body fat and find a plan once I reach my goal weight of 260 lbs. I have a general understanding of macros but I would like to know what my goals should be percentage wise to reach a healthy caloric deficit.
@edc58 - we need more information. Current weight, height, age, and activity level. Like people above have said, you don't have to go low carb to lose weight. All you have to do to lose weight is create a calorie deficit. Within that deficit, you can set up your macros in whatever way works best for you.
As an athlete, I expect you want to maintain your muscle mass, and you probably plan to continue to workout, right? If those assumptions are true, I propose this. Set your protein macros to 0.8 to 1 gram per pound of your goal weight, so about 200-260 grams of protein per day. Protein is 4 calories per gram, so that's 800-1040 calories of your day. Fats need to be approximately .35 grams per pound of goal weight, so about 90 grams of fat per day. Fat is 9 calories per gram, so that's 810 calories per day. The rest of your daily calories can be carbs. I can't guess how much carbs, because I don't know the stats I listed above in bold.
Also, if you do plan to continue to workout, you'll need some carbs to fuel those workouts. Zero/low carb makes it difficult for most people to maximize their workouts.
7 -
You're creating an extremely large deficit, probably by putting in 2lbs a week and sedentary.
2500 comes up as your BMR, not a reasonable TDEE or even NEAT figure, which is what MFP uses.
Are you truly sedentary? Less than 3500 steps or 45 minutes of NON SITTING activity a day? That's when you would select sedentary (or "not very active" in some of the apps)
Creating a LARGE deficit will work against you retaining your lean mass and strength and make your gym sessions less effective. And may work against your long term goal of future weight stability.
As an absolute minimum I hope you're planning to eat each and every exercise calorie, or I would urge you to consider a goal compatible with a slower loss
I am making the assumption that even though you're at a considerably obese BMI and you're wanting to come down to a still obese BMI, you are much more muscular than your average obese person, for example myself when starting out I.e. that your fat reserve levels are over-stated by BMI
7 -
If you are sincerely open to learning, @edc58, here's some things you need to know for successful weight loss.
1. BMR = Basal Metabolic Rate = the amount of calories you would need to sustain your weight with absolutely zero exercise/movement (like in a coma or bed-ridden).
2. TDEE = Total Daily Energy Expenditure = this amount of calories is your BMR plus your daily movement and exercise that will sustain your current weight
3. The faster you lose weight, the more muscle you will lose. Slower weight loss helps insure you are losing fat, and not muscle. To retain as much muscle as possible, you want a smaller caloric deficit (maybe 500 calories under TDEE), adequate protein intake, and a proven progressive lifting program.
I put your stats into a TDEE calculator, and came up with these numbers:
You can eat almost 3800 calories, and still lose weight. In fact, anything under 4700 calories per day will cause weight loss (just more slowly). 2500 calories is going to be too steep of a deficit for you, and you will absolutely lose muscle.
5 -
@quiksylver296 we both have the same concern but your numbers are coming up even higher than mine.
I am coming up with a 2452 BMR using 6ft 4", 300lbs, male, 22yo.
Which would put a sedentary person @ 3065 and a lightly active one at 3450.
Not having see the OP in person I can't be sure. But at these levels he could start with a 750 deficit for 1.5lbs a week after any initial faster losses that may happen in the very beginning.
But I wouldn't go much faster.
I.e. I would start by eating 3500 and letting exercise and activity create the deficit (at his size they can easily come to 750 Cal, heck even 1k depending on overall activity)
To be very honest I wouldn't even do that to begin.
Just log food eaten while eating at will for a week or two.
The act of logging the food (especially when starting up with logging being more labour intensive till you're used to it), especially if logging before eating will probably create a deficit that is as large or larger on its own!!!!!!
The benefit will be that he can then look through the logs and evaluate his intake making easy substitutions for things he finds less rewarding (for satiation, nutrition, or other reasons) as compared to other options!
4 -
This is helping a lot. I can’t thank you guys enough. Moving foward I’m going to focus on constant logging of meals and move to a 3500 calorie diet.9
-
-
Wow. I can't believe the hate for low carbers on this site. Having said that-- Zero carbs is hard to maintain. Maybe 3-5 days just to get in ketosis. I recommend Dr. Berg on YouTube. His videos are really good for healthy low carbing and he gives advice on Macros. He recommends 8 cups of non starch veggies a day plus higher fat proteins. On keto you will have 5-10% carbs, 15-20% protein and the rest fat. This is highly effective for weightloss. I lost 100 lbs on keto and got off insulin and my thyroid medication (per doctor, I didn't just stop taking them).1
-
JaneDoeSix wrote: »Wow. I can't believe the hate for low carbers on this site. Having said that-- Zero carbs is hard to maintain. Maybe 3-5 days just to get in ketosis. I recommend Dr. Berg on YouTube. His videos are really good for healthy low carbing and he gives advice on Macros. He recommends 8 cups of non starch veggies a day plus higher fat proteins. On keto you will have 5-10% carbs, 15-20% protein and the rest fat. This is highly effective for weightloss. I lost 100 lbs on keto and got off insulin and my thyroid medication (per doctor, I didn't just stop taking them).
Dr. Berg the discredited chiropractor? Nope, no thanks.
OP, you got some great advice and you are taking it on board. Good for you!8 -
JaneDoeSix wrote: »Wow. I can't believe the hate for low carbers on this site. Having said that-- Zero carbs is hard to maintain. Maybe 3-5 days just to get in ketosis. I recommend Dr. Berg on YouTube. His videos are really good for healthy low carbing and he gives advice on Macros. He recommends 8 cups of non starch veggies a day plus higher fat proteins. On keto you will have 5-10% carbs, 15-20% protein and the rest fat. This is highly effective for weightloss. I lost 100 lbs on keto and got off insulin and my thyroid medication (per doctor, I didn't just stop taking them).
It isn’t hate. It’s just pointing out that keto isn’t the only option.
As a competitive powerlifter, I NEED carbs to fuel my workouts. And trying to cut carbs makes me freak out and binge. I know, I tried Atkins in the 90’s.
You aren’t in the same position as I am, I assume, so you do what works for you and I’ll do what works for me and we can share our experiences with others here on the boards.
But Berg is a discredited quack.
10 -
quiksylver296 wrote: »JaneDoeSix wrote: »Wow. I can't believe the hate for low carbers on this site. Having said that-- Zero carbs is hard to maintain. Maybe 3-5 days just to get in ketosis. I recommend Dr. Berg on YouTube. His videos are really good for healthy low carbing and he gives advice on Macros. He recommends 8 cups of non starch veggies a day plus higher fat proteins. On keto you will have 5-10% carbs, 15-20% protein and the rest fat. This is highly effective for weightloss. I lost 100 lbs on keto and got off insulin and my thyroid medication (per doctor, I didn't just stop taking them).
It isn’t hate. It’s just pointing out that keto isn’t the only option.
As a competitive powerlifter, I NEED carbs to fuel my workouts. And trying to cut carbs makes me freak out and binge. I know, I tried Atkins in the 90’s.
You aren’t in the same position as I am, I assume, so you do what works for you and I’ll do what works for me and we can share our experiences with others here on the boards.
But Berg is a discredited quack.
You said it all perfectly, especially the bolded. While keto is a perfectly good dietary modality in some circumstances and can help some with calorie control by blunting hunger, there are other situations like yours and the OPs that it is likely the wrong choice.
Bottom line is that keto has no metabolic advantage over any other form of calorie restriction when calories and protein are held constant and this have been proven on tons of studies. If it works and is appropriate for someone's situation, great. Or even if it is just how someone prefers to eat.
However, there are many, many stories of people using keto as tool to drop the weight but finding it too restrictive after awhile and gaining a lot of weight back. This is also true with many other diet modalities too. The key is to learn sustainable habits.
And yeah, no thanks on Berg. A chiropractor whose license to practice was suspended and now does YouTube videos on nutrition? I don't think so...
7 -
A video regarding Berg's info and background by an actual doctor. Short but clear debunking of Berg's theories. Particularly his complete misunderstanding of how insulin functions in the body.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pnix75yLXqE6
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions