How big a deficit can I have?
leesey147
Posts: 9 Member
I’m 5ft3” and currently 154lb. Have managed to lose 10lb fairly quickly over the last 3 weeks by eating between 1000-1200kcal a day. But I’m reading that this will not be effective going forward.
I believe my maintenance calories are around 1600 so my deficit really isn’t huge. I don’t particularly want to eat more as I need bigger losses than 0.5-1lb a week to stay motivated. If I stay at my current intake will my weight loss just stall?
I really am not a keen exerciser and have 2 young children at home that makes it difficult to even get steps in because we go at a snails pace.
I want to lose another 20lbs and I want to do it fairly quickly. I already know the answer... exercise. But any other helpful advice will be welcome!
I believe my maintenance calories are around 1600 so my deficit really isn’t huge. I don’t particularly want to eat more as I need bigger losses than 0.5-1lb a week to stay motivated. If I stay at my current intake will my weight loss just stall?
I really am not a keen exerciser and have 2 young children at home that makes it difficult to even get steps in because we go at a snails pace.
I want to lose another 20lbs and I want to do it fairly quickly. I already know the answer... exercise. But any other helpful advice will be welcome!
1
Replies
-
It's great that you are trying to lose weight/get healthy! A 600 calorie deficit is quite big and might be difficult to keep up long term because you might end up having low energy from not eating enough. If you aren't really increasing your exercise then as you lose weight your matinience calories will decrease so your weight loss rate will slow down. If working out isn't really a viable option you can try to increase other activity in your life in other small ways, for example if you use a dishwasher then doing the dishes by hand can burn extra calories. Try not to get discouraged if you feel like you aren't losing weight fast enough, all progress is good no matter how slow!1
-
I’m 5ft3” and currently 154lb. Have managed to lose 10lb fairly quickly over the last 3 weeks by eating between 1000-1200kcal a day. But I’m reading that this will not be effective going forward.
I believe my maintenance calories are around 1600 so my deficit really isn’t huge. I don’t particularly want to eat more as I need bigger losses than 0.5-1lb a week to stay motivated. If I stay at my current intake will my weight loss just stall?
I really am not a keen exerciser and have 2 young children at home that makes it difficult to even get steps in because we go at a snails pace.
I want to lose another 20lbs and I want to do it fairly quickly. I already know the answer... exercise. But any other helpful advice will be welcome!
There's a fare chance you won't like my answer but I will write it anyway. I wish someone said this to me when I was losing weight. Things would have been much different and easier.
So, this 1000-1200 calories, will you be able to maintain eating this much for the rest of your life? What would happen/how would it affect you, if you are 20 pounds lighter in 10 weeks instead of the 20-40 weeks time frame, in fairly regular pace?
Now to answer your question, our mechanism is quite smart. Regular low calorie consumption sets our metabolism slightly lower since we are consuming less food, hence less food to process, and body adapts/becomes efficient using lesser fuel. I would still argue 1000-1200 calories should still help you lose weight. The question is if it is still healthy or not. Also, if you are still lowering your calories under 1000/1200, probably be also prepared for mental breakdown, hair loss (because your body needs to survive, hair is a lesser business for it then), mood swing and god forbid binge and many other things people really don't talk about when it comes to losing weight.4 -
The problem is your motivation and mental state, not your deficit. At your weight, you don’t have enough to lose to do it both quickly and healthily. 1lb per week is an absolute maximum for recommended weight loss rate. 10lb in 3 weeks at your weight (+10lbs) is alarmingly fast and you are running head first into medical trouble. Exercise is NOT the answer, calming down and accepting things will take time is.
If you really ate 1000-1200kcal per day while losing 10lbs in 3 weeks, your true maintenance calories would be at least 2500. You would lose 1lb per week at a 500 deficit, meaning if your maintenance calories really were 1600 you would have only lost 3lbs in those 3 weeks.
Here’s the big question: do you plan on maintaining your weight, or gaining it right back when you are ”done”? If you plan on maintaining, you have to learn a way of eating and living that’s sustainable for you from this moment to the day you die. If the way of eating you want to continue with is a 1500+ deficit, the day you die might come pretty soon, if you’re unlucky. Learning a new way of eating takes time, but slow and steady really wins the race. I don’t know about you and your eating habits, it might be about portion control, introducing lower-calorie options or any number of things. You just have to be prepared to make those changes for the rest of your life.
I know this could be tough to hear, but seriously. If nothing else here sinks in, think about your kids and what kind of example you want to set: crash dieting, weight yo-yoing and struggling with long-term motivation to reach a goal, or a healthy relaxed relationship with food, perseverance, healthy eating habits and showing your own body some grace and love? Kids do pick up on these things.10 -
Yeah I know those numbers don’t make sense in that 3 week period but I definitely didn’t eat less than 1000kcal per day. Maybe my maintenance is slightly higher.
Definitely my motivation is the biggest problem. When progress is slow I just lose interest.
I have to do it slow and steady then I guess.
1 -
Yeah I know those numbers don’t make sense in that 3 week period but I definitely didn’t eat less than 1000kcal per day. Maybe my maintenance is slightly higher.
Definitely my motivation is the biggest problem. When progress is slow I just lose interest.
I have to do it slow and steady then I guess.
What is the alternative. Slow, steady and healthy or not at all?
If you don't do it slow steady and healthy it seems you have 2 choices:
Stay overweight or do it in a way that can damage your health. How do those alternatives sound?
You really need to take a hard look and your mind set and attitude toward this process.6 -
I think I’m probably finding it hard to accept that I’ve let myself get to this place that I really hate and feel embarrassed about and I’m looking for a quick fix to feel better.
But obviously it’s not going to work out long term, or at all, trying to cheat my way to a goal.2 -
The minimum a sedentary female should be eating is 1200 calories. If you only have 20 lbs to lose then .5 lbs a week is healthy weight loss. Slow and steady is the best approach.3
-
I think I’m probably finding it hard to accept that I’ve let myself get to this place that I really hate and feel embarrassed about and I’m looking for a quick fix to feel better.
But obviously it’s not going to work out long term, or at all, trying to cheat my way to a goal.
I absolutely can relate to this feeling.
I was actually shocked with my weight when I finally saw it at the doctor's office.
Anger can be a good motivator, though. I also used a carrot on a stick. I planned a big vacation in a hot tropical location 10 months from the time I started to lose weight. I got to a healthy BMI two weeks before I left. Bathing suits and shorts and tank tops can be highly motivating!4 -
cmriverside wrote: »I think I’m probably finding it hard to accept that I’ve let myself get to this place that I really hate and feel embarrassed about and I’m looking for a quick fix to feel better.
But obviously it’s not going to work out long term, or at all, trying to cheat my way to a goal.
I absolutely can relate to this feeling.
I was actually shocked with my weight when I finally saw it at the doctor's office.
Anger can be a good motivator, though. I also used a carrot on a stick. I planned a big vacation in a hot tropical location 10 months from the time I started to lose weight. I got to a healthy BMI two weeks before I left. Bathing suits and shorts and tank tops can be highly motivating!
Oh yes. I went shopping today, getting some basics and loose-cut tops to tide me over until I can get a real new wardrobe. After shopping, I went to the gym, and the motivation was definitely there.0 -
Thank you all for the advice/feedback.
Facing up to a few home truths can be painful. I do need to make a change and commit to it.
We should be going on big family holiday next summer so if I can feel confident in a bikini that would be amazing.
4 -
Another question..
On the app I adjusted my goal from 2lb a week loss which gives me 1200kcal to 1lb a week which gives me 1230kcal.
How would I calculate a more accurate figure for the one pound loss because 30kcal a day can’t be the difference between a 1lb loss and a 2lb loss surely?
1 -
Another question..
On the app I adjusted my goal from 2lb a week loss which gives me 1200kcal to 1lb a week which gives me 1230kcal.
How would I calculate a more accurate figure for the one pound loss because 30kcal a day can’t be the difference between a 1lb loss and a 2lb loss surely?
It's because you are hitting the minimum that MFP won't get let you go below, if there was an option to lose 3lbs a week (I'm glad there isn't that option!!) it would still show 1200.
Remember in reality 1200 + exercise calories is what that goal means.
Give 1230 + exercise calories an extended trial and then you will know how to adjust for a sensible and sustainable weight loss.
4 -
The minimum calories MFP will give is 1200. For me to lose 2 lbs a week I'd have to be in a 1000 calorie a day deficit, or only eat 1067 calories a day. (That's never going to happen.) So mfp as to give me 1200 calories since it can't give me lower.
For me to lose a .5 lb a week it puts my calories closer to 1800.
What are your calories at .5 lbs a week?1 -
1480 for a 0.5lb loss
1 -
Also, underscoring: You set up for 2 pounds a week, at first, and actually lost more than 3 pounds a week. Now, since that wasn't a full menstrual cycle (betting you're premenopausal age), and it included your first weeks of calorie restriction (the first couple can be an unusually big drop, though not universally), 3+ pounds per week may be somewhat overstated.
However, your actual experience in real life is more important than what any so called calculator says. (In reality, they don't "calculate", they estimate . . . and that goes for fitness trackers, too).
If you're actually losing 3+ pounds a week (we're not sure, looking forward), then you can eat around 1000 calories daily more than you've been eating, and still lose a pound a week. Even though you don't have long-enough of reality-based data to be certain, I think you'd be perfectly safe adding 500 to what you're currently eating daily. I think you'll still lose at a good rate, possibly still a too-fast rate.
I started here at literally your current weight (in 2015), truly sedentary outside of exercise, though I'm a little taller (5'5"), but much older (59 then, 64 now). MFP estimated 1200 for me, too. (That's not a terrible estimate for many of my demographics, BTW - including age.) I ate back all exercise calories, on top of that (probably 300 or so daily, most days). I lost faster than estimated, lots faster. I corrected quickly. Still, I got weak and fatigued, and it took multiple weeks to recover. With small children to keep up with, you don't want that to happen. (With small children, it's very unlikely you're truly sedentary, too.)
(As an aside: I lost most of my weight, down to my current 130-ish, at 1400-1600 net calories and up, in practice more like 1700-1900 gross calories and up, after the exercise. RIght now, I'm losing super slowly - intentionally - at 1850 plus exercise.)
I'd suggest you eat at least 500 more calories daily, and monitor for another several weeks. Staying strong and healthy is a good and useful thing. Losing weight "too slowly" is a mildly frustrating thing. Between health/energy risk and frustration, I know - from experience - which one I'd personally choose.
Best wishes: You can do this!
2 -
Thank you that’s interesting.
Yes I’m 32. I’ve recently gone on the mini pill and my periods are all over the place as well. I don’t know how much this is going to affect my weight.
I see what you’re saying that potentially I could be eating a lot more but I think the 3lb per week loss has to be a fluke. If I added on 500 cals I’d pretty much be eating what I need just to maintain my weight.
I will be going back to my part time work soon which is a fairly active job. But running round after the kids is literally the only ‘exercise’ I do.
I have been pretty snappy and irritable lately. I‘ve put this down to feeling frustrated and fed up with being stuck at home (covid-19). And potentially mood changes because of the aforementioned pill.1 -
Thank you that’s interesting.
Yes I’m 32. I’ve recently gone on the mini pill and my periods are all over the place as well. I don’t know how much this is going to affect my weight.
I see what you’re saying that potentially I could be eating a lot more but I think the 3lb per week loss has to be a fluke. If I added on 500 cals I’d pretty much be eating what I need just to maintain my weight.
I will be going back to my part time work soon which is a fairly active job. But running round after the kids is literally the only ‘exercise’ I do.
I have been pretty snappy and irritable lately. I‘ve put this down to feeling frustrated and fed up with being stuck at home (covid-19). And potentially mood changes because of the aforementioned pill.
What is it that you're relying on, when you say that 1600 is where you maintain weight? Experience? A "calculator" (which one)? A fitness tracker device?
Yes, hormonal fluctuations will affect bodyweight, but I'm not sure the "sustained loss" variation would be the most common.
And honestly, on MFP, anecdotally most people seem to find the border between sedentary (or "not very active" in some MFP apps) and lightly active to be somewhere around 3500-5000 steps. That's really not many steps (and wrangling young children isn't just steps, in terms of things that could burn extra calories).
Snappy and irritable is another early sign of under-eating, BTW.
Be careful . . . please?5 -
tdeecalculator.net estimates 1659 for maintenance so I’m using that as a starting point.
I am listening and really appreciate your advice. I want to do it right and be successful.
0 -
Thank you that’s interesting.
Yes I’m 32. I’ve recently gone on the mini pill and my periods are all over the place as well. I don’t know how much this is going to affect my weight.
I see what you’re saying that potentially I could be eating a lot more but I think the 3lb per week loss has to be a fluke. If I added on 500 cals I’d pretty much be eating what I need just to maintain my weight.
I will be going back to my part time work soon which is a fairly active job. But running round after the kids is literally the only ‘exercise’ I do.
I have been pretty snappy and irritable lately. I‘ve put this down to feeling frustrated and fed up with being stuck at home (covid-19). And potentially mood changes because of the aforementioned pill.
I think you really need to consider that your maintenance calories are more than 1600.
Mfp (based on your questionable choice of sedentary) indicates your maintenance is 1730.
Your results indicate you’re currently running a 1500 calorie per day deficit. Meaning your maintenance is more like 2500-2700 (so you’re not sedentary).
Eating another 500 calories per day isn’t going to put you anywhere near maintenance. In fact, it’s still going to put you at a very large deficit.
Wanting to get the weight off as quickly as possible is a really normal desire. Losing too quickly means your body is going to do things like eat away your muscles in order to keep up. In addition to helping us function well in the world, look good in our skin and give us the strength to chase children, some muscles are critically important to your survival-like your heart.
Calculators, trackers and such are a great place to start. Actual results are what tells the real story.
Please take care of yourself.6 -
Your deficit is created by calories burned versus calories consumed. You CAN'T just keep lowering your calories because it WILL impact your nutritional RDA's and minerals needed. So the factor here is exercise. Now if you can't or won't do exercise, then increase your NEAT. NEAT stands for "nonexercise activity thermogenesis". For example when you do laundry and are putting it away, put it away one article at a time. All the walking back an forth will knock your steps up obviously. If you go out, park further away, use stairs instead of escalators/elevators, and even fidget when you sit.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
0 -
tdeecalculator.net estimates 1659 for maintenance so I’m using that as a starting point.
I am listening and really appreciate your advice. I want to do it right and be successful.
Experience is a better guide than any calculator. Calculators spit out population averages. You're an individual.
Your experiece - strictly speaking - is a little on the too-short side to be a good guide.
But even 3 weeks experience suggests - not weakly! - that your maintenance calories are not 1600.
Just for fun, I went to TDEEcalculator.net, and put in my data, at sedentary. It says my sedentary maintenance is 1369. Nearly 5 years of careful logging experience tells me that I maintain around 2000 calories (before exercise - up or down a bit seasonally, but around that). It's wrong by 600 calories, more or less - around 30% low. And I'm truly sedentary. (I suspect you aren't, so your light exercise calories from that calculator would be more like 1900.)
If I ate what that calculator recommends (which I wouldn't, and quite probably couldn't), I'd lose much more rapidly than any sensible person should at my current size. That would be - frankly - a risky and therefore dumb thing for me to do.
I suggested you could eat 500 more calories daily and still lose a pound a week because your (too-short) experience is suggesting you could actually eat 1000 calories more daily, and still lose a pound a week.
Your TDEE is very unlikely, based on your experience, to be 1600. Possible? Sure. Anything is possible. Really not likely.
@Duck_Puddle is right.5 -
Ok I will up the calories and see what affect that has.
I will think of the last 3 weeks a a big kick start and now can go more sensibly.
3 -
When my kiddos were smaller, I would put them in a double walking stroller and go for a long walk. You will be able to get more movement in each day. Be creative and try to find ways for you to be active while at home with them. Walking laps around the backyard while they play? See what you can come up with! :-)0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions