We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

What’s the difference between ‘Calories net and total’

sarahcclay
sarahcclay Posts: 5 Member
edited December 2024 in Food and Nutrition
Hi.
I’m eating 1200 a day, burning 450 a day by cycling.

I’m only eating 1200 a day-is that correct?
I’m losing on average 1lb a week and I’ve lost a stone in 14 weeks.

But I’m confused by the calories net and total.

For example,
My weekly ‘net’ says under weekly goal by 2300 calories but the ‘total’ says I’m
Over my weekly goal by 1250 calories

What does it mean please.
Thanks

Replies

  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,439 Member
    The "net calories under weekly goal" is how far under your weekly goal you ate, I think. If you are supposed to be eating 1200 calories per day, that's 8400 calories per week. And you ate 2300 under the 8400 (which is way too low, BTW).

    But since you're losing a pound a week pretty linearly, I'd say you're fine. If you aren't using a food scale, I suspect you are eating more per day than you think. No reason to fix it, imo, just a note.

    If you stop losing a pound a week, I'd suggest incorporating a food scale into your weight loss tool belt.

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10634517/you-dont-use-a-food-scale/p1
  • Lietchi
    Lietchi Posts: 6,991 Member
    edited June 2020
    Net calories are what matter, and by that standard you are undereating quite a bit. (1200 net calories is what is commonly mentioned here as the minimum for women.)
    But your exercise calories could be overestimated and/or you could possibly not conform to the averages used in MFP to calculate your calorie goal and/or you could be be ating more than you think)

    So your actual weight loss rate is also something you should look at.
    What weight loss rate have you selected in MFP: also 1 lb a week, like your real weight loss rate, or a different rate?
    And what is your height, how much do you weigh and what is you goal weight?
  • sarahcclay
    sarahcclay Posts: 5 Member
    edited June 2020
    I’m 5ft7, at the mo I weight 9st 4lb. I was 10st 4lb 14 weeks ago.
    Want to get to 8st 8lb.

    I’ve selected lose 2lb a week. But not losing that.
    So if I ate what I’d burnt off with my exercise, would I possibly lose the 2lb??
    I’ve attached what I’ve lost
  • Go_Deskercise
    Go_Deskercise Posts: 1,630 Member
    v85z5silsh6a.png
  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,439 Member
    edited June 2020
    You're in the last ten pounds? You shouldn't be losing 2 pounds per week. See graphic above.

    I would suggest finding the maintenance calories for 8 st 8, and just eating that number. Then you won't have any adjusting to do when you reach goal.
  • Lietchi
    Lietchi Posts: 6,991 Member
    edited June 2020
    sarahcclay wrote: »
    I’m 5ft7, at the mo I weight 9st 4lb. I was 10st 4lb 14 weeks ago.
    Want to get to 8st 8lb.

    I’ve selected lose 2lb a week. But not losing that.
    So if I ate what I’d burnt off with my exercise, would I possibly lose the 2lb??
    I’ve attached what I’ve lost

    With only 10 lbs to lose, you really shouldn't be aiming at 2lbs per week. And certainly not considering you're already at quite a low BMI and aiming to get close to underweight.
    The reason you're not actually losing that much (fortunately) is because MFP won't give you a calorie goal lower than 1200.
    I'd aim at losing 0.5lbs a week. (Or even at not losing anymore weight, considering you already have a healthy BMI, and focusing on body composition)
  • yirara
    yirara Posts: 10,116 Member
    Would you be happy to only eat 750 calories per day? Because that's what you say you're doing: eating 1200 calories and burning 450 calories cycling. It's the same. No, it's not healthy. There's a big chance that your calorie burns from cycling are in fact lower but it still means you're severely undereating. It's extremely unhealthy. Please don't do that.
  • sarahcclay
    sarahcclay Posts: 5 Member
    Thank you everyone.
    I’ll look into all your advise :-)
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    sarahcclay wrote: »
    I’m 5ft7, at the mo I weight 9st 4lb. I was 10st 4lb 14 weeks ago.
    Want to get to 8st 8lb.

    I’ve selected lose 2lb a week. But not losing that.
    So if I ate what I’d burnt off with my exercise, would I possibly lose the 2lb??
    I’ve attached what I’ve lost

    You are definitely not eating enough and losing too fast. Not healthy at all.

    Why is your goal to be just about underweight? If you aren't happy with your body composition it is usually a matter of not having enough muscle so I would look into recomp, so maintaining your weight, progressive lifting/resistance training, getting enough protein to build muscle and lose fat over time.
This discussion has been closed.