Scooby TDEE

silken555
silken555 Posts: 478 Member
edited August 2021 in Health and Weight Loss
Hi everyone!

Oof...it's hard to believe it's been nearly 7 years since I've been in here. But hey, we can always start again, right!

I did a quick forum search but the entries were 6 years old...😅

Is Scooby's still one of the best TDEE calculators or has anything more recent come out?

Thanks for answering...🥰

Replies

  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,332 Member
    sail rabbit @heybales 's just tdee please and scooby was still good last time I checked.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,672 Member
    Specfically:

    https://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/

    and

    Just TDEE Please spreadsheet:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G7FgNzPq3v5WMjDtH0n93LXSMRY_hjmzNTMJb3aZSxM/edit?usp=sharing

    Better than either (with no shade to that spreadsheet, especially): Pick one to start, stick to the estimate for one or more full menstrual cycles (since you look like you might be in that demographic - otherwise 4-6 weeks), calculate average weekly weight loss, then adjust intake based on the result. Personal experience data, in a context of reasonably accurate logging, is about as good as it can possibly get.

    As somewhat of a statistical-averages outlier, personal experience data is pretty much the only one that works really well for me. YMMV.
  • silken555
    silken555 Posts: 478 Member
    Thank you to both of you.

    AnnPT77, yup...always adjusting as you go. That's how I was taught...:)
  • steveko89
    steveko89 Posts: 2,223 Member
    silken555 wrote: »
    Thank you to both of you.

    AnnPT77, yup...always adjusting as you go. That's how I was taught...:)

    Another vote to continually adjust as you go. For years my observed TDEE fell right on "lightly active" for Tdeecalculator.net, or "1-3 hours/week" on scooby and I assumed it was a fairly static number. However, after years of eating at a deficit or maintenance I finally embarked on an intentional mass phase last fall and was surprised to see my TDEE increase by about 7%. What's been even more interesting is that it's remained elevated after gradually cutting ~5lb of the ~8-9 I gained. I didn't think I'd wandered into the chronic dieting waters but seeing that increase (despite no change an activity) it's the only thing I can conclude.
  • wunderkindking
    wunderkindking Posts: 1,615 Member
    steveko89 wrote: »
    silken555 wrote: »
    Thank you to both of you.

    AnnPT77, yup...always adjusting as you go. That's how I was taught...:)

    Another vote to continually adjust as you go. For years my observed TDEE fell right on "lightly active" for Tdeecalculator.net, or "1-3 hours/week" on scooby and I assumed it was a fairly static number. However, after years of eating at a deficit or maintenance I finally embarked on an intentional mass phase last fall and was surprised to see my TDEE increase by about 7%. What's been even more interesting is that it's remained elevated after gradually cutting ~5lb of the ~8-9 I gained. I didn't think I'd wandered into the chronic dieting waters but seeing that increase (despite no change an activity) it's the only thing I can conclude.

    I had this happen - my TDEE/calories to maintain is higher now at 135 than it was at 190. I took diet breaks often (every 5lbs or so). so I got to watch it creep upward. My base movement/activities I do has stayed about the same. All I can really figure is that my NEAT has increased with less weight. It's not a crazy amount higher - maybe 150-200 calories? - but it's kind of interesting.