We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

3 months later. Same weight. Different BF% *pic*

bethybum31
bethybum31 Posts: 2 Member
edited August 2021 in Health and Weight Loss
Hi MFP.
I weighed myself yest, weight is the same as 3x months previous. I used the same brand/store/scales. However my BF% is significantly different. I have done zero exercise lately so no chance of 'fat has turned to muscle'. Is this just proof that these type of scales are Very inaccurate..? I think so! But I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.

20210813_224634.jpg

Replies

  • MaltedTea
    MaltedTea Posts: 6,286 Member
    edited August 2021
    Since there are kids in my home, there are several "profiles" set up. If I don't catch it sometimes, my scale assumes I'm not me due to weight and body composition changes. Mind you, it's like 12+ years old too.

    Even if you're the sole user, try a reset.

    Then be sure to use the device at the same time, under similar conditions (such as weighing yourself while fasted, evacuated and naked at the same time every day)
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 35,305 Member
    If it's just two readings, then inaccuracy is certainly the likeliest.

    If a person uses the same scale, weighs often, they may be able to get a rational trend line that gives them a rough idea which *direction* body composition is heading over a longer time period, but they may need to ignore the occasional blip or outlier where the BIA scale was fooled by unusual hydration or something.

    I wouldn't put much faith in the accuracy of absolute value of the percentages, though, even when there's a trend.

    IOW, if over a few months, at constant weight, you were to see BF% 26.4, 26.6, 26.3, 26.2, 26.0, 26.2, 28.5, 28.1, 26.0, 25.8, 26.0, 26.1 . . . . you might reasonably conclude that the 28s were random outlier mis-measurements, and that there was an overall down-trend in bodyfat (probably). It might really not be "around 26%", maybe it's higher or lower in absolute value, but the trend still can be providing information.

    If weight isn't constant, and the scale gives a percent, I think it's easier for the average person to get a better idea of what's being estimated if they calculate the implied BF pounds. If body weight drops, but BF% stays constant at (say) 30%, that's 30% of a declining number, so probable loss of body fat implied, y'know? One might not like the idea that lean & fat are being lost proportionally in that scenario, but there's still fat loss being estimated.

Categories