Calculating Starbucks Calories with Substitutions
![joseph9](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/a0be/abb4/f3fd/1766/4854/55ce/f861/a80d4505b793e73a4052bca89984f3793648.jpg)
joseph9
Posts: 328 Member
Does anybody know a surefire way to calculate Starbucks drink calories with substitutions? Here's my problem, but I'd love to know a general way.
1) I enjoy a venti pistachio latte with almond milk, but Starbucks' menu calculator won't adjust calories if you change the milk product or make other changes other than size. It tells you that a venti pistachio latte is 400 calories no matter what you do to the milk or other ingredients.
2) I found a website somewhere that said that a plain venti almond milk latte was 130 calories, and Starbucks' menu says that a plain venti 2% milk latte is 250 calories, so I assumed that almond milk saves 120 calories, resulting in 280 for my drink.
Does Starbucks list the calories ingredient by ingredient someplace so I can do the math myself? Thanks!
1) I enjoy a venti pistachio latte with almond milk, but Starbucks' menu calculator won't adjust calories if you change the milk product or make other changes other than size. It tells you that a venti pistachio latte is 400 calories no matter what you do to the milk or other ingredients.
2) I found a website somewhere that said that a plain venti almond milk latte was 130 calories, and Starbucks' menu says that a plain venti 2% milk latte is 250 calories, so I assumed that almond milk saves 120 calories, resulting in 280 for my drink.
Does Starbucks list the calories ingredient by ingredient someplace so I can do the math myself? Thanks!
0
Replies
-
I have no idea whether it's accurate or not, but this calculator (not put out by Starbucks) seems willing to estimate that specific drink.
https://lattecalories.com/siren
It guesses 252 calories. As a long-term (6+ year) calorie logger, I'd consider 252 plenty close enough to 280, unless you live on them, since we're unavoidably making small errors all the time, and it isn't worth a lot of stress IMO. (For example, one apple is sweeter than the next . . . .). They average out, within reason.
Faced with 2 or more equally superficially plausible estimates, like 252/280 maybe, I'd tend to log the higher one. YMMV.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 439 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions