Interesting graph showing energy usage vs time...
threewins
Posts: 1,455 Member
Using a metabolic chamber, which is a room where all the carbon dioxide expelled from a person is measured, down to the nearest 5 minutes or so. The author was in the room for just under a day.
There are only about 30 of these metabolic chambers around the world, I guess as people get bigger more will be built.
https://www.vox.com/2018/9/4/17486110/metabolism-diet-fast-weight-loss
PS the photo at the start of the article and halfway down shows the author in or near a Bod Pod which is used to determine body volume using Boyle's Law.
There are only about 30 of these metabolic chambers around the world, I guess as people get bigger more will be built.
https://www.vox.com/2018/9/4/17486110/metabolism-diet-fast-weight-loss
PS the photo at the start of the article and halfway down shows the author in or near a Bod Pod which is used to determine body volume using Boyle's Law.
1
Replies
-
I'm not sure what message you're trying to give us here?
Yes, exercise potentially can burn quite a few calories (usually, it's less than "quite a few").
Most of us don't have access to metabolic chambers, and I doubt that's going to become a common-ish (affordable) thing anytime soon.
If I saw that kind of exercise performance in myself, I'd think I was overdoing. It might be fun for a day, but IMO it would be a dumb way to live life every single repeated way.
But I'm lazy.2 -
How I burned 2,889 net caloriess in well under 6hrs.....
https://www.strava.com/activities/7221736249
Which would make that day's TDEE well over 5,000.
And unlike metabolic chambers bicycles are freely available and there are millions around the world....
But that ride wasn't for weight loss if that's the point you are trying to make?
Not seeing why routinely putting people in metabolic chambers would be useful unless it's for knocking down "It's so much harder for me" excuses?
1 -
I find it quite funny to see 'attempting to sleep' burns more calories than resting
Aside from that, not sure what the message is?2 -
Thanks for sharing this, OP. The linked article is very good and full of valuable takeaways:I’d long believed these fat years somehow wreaked havoc on my body. Specifically, I thought they slowed down my metabolic rate, and that that made me prone to weight gain. But I was about to learn this idea I’d held on to for so long was wrong.The results of these food surveys made me wonder how many of us blame some aspect of our biology for weight gain when we’re really just underestimating our calorie intake, forgetting all the little extras we eat and drink that can add up to pounds over the years. It seems I had too.The chamber has also shown that while some people have a “slow metabolism” relative to others their size and age, this isn’t a major cause of obesity. And despite the focus on “metabolism boosting” for weight loss, there’s nothing money can buy that will speed your metabolism up in way that will lead to substantial slimming.5
-
I missed the boat when I first replied to this thread: Somehow, I got distracted by the big graphic, found it confusing, didn't see the link. (! 😬🙄 !) Apologies, OP.
The article at the link really is excellent, level-headed, nuanced.
Another thing with similar insights (plus good footnoting) that I'd found useful was this:
https://examine.com/nutrition/does-metabolism-vary-between-two-people/0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions