Frustrated!

Why is it so hard to lose weight!? I felt so relieved last week when my doctor told me that my bloodwork showed I have gluten intolerance, insulin resistance and high cortisol because she gave me natural supplements to take to help reverse my insulin resistance which makes it easier to lose weight. But since then I’ve only lost 2 lbs. I have dieted every day of summer break (I am a teacher) and am only down 7 lbs in 3 weeks 😞. I have so far to go and I just want to be happy now!

Bleh. Sorry! I’m just feeling frustrated this morning. It’s just frustrating that my body gains so easily but then takes sooo much effort to lose.

I probably should throw my scale away, but I could never lol.

I have 60-70 lbs to lose still and I just don’t feel like I’ll ever get there.

fyjfsgnc7bky.jpeg

Replies

  • Lietchi
    Lietchi Posts: 6,888 Member
    I think you need to adjust your expectations: there is nothing 'only' about losing 7 lbs in 3 weeks! That's a good rate of loss, on the fast side even.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,030 Member
    This AIN'T the biggest loser and expecting to lose 10lbs in 2 weeks or so is not to be expected. The body is very very good at storage and keeping calories. It doesn't like to give up calories (just the survival set up in our bodies due to only small amounts of food since our caveman days).
    You just have to be consistent day in and day out and take what your body gives you. Just like instruction, pupils don't learn everything about math, english, science, etc. in a month. It's continually progressing little by little to get to the big finish.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 40 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • Hobartlemagne
    Hobartlemagne Posts: 603 Member
    I wish I lost that much in that amount of time.
    So far, it took me 123days to lose 16lbs.
    It takes so much longer than expected, and it really does take time before you can see a difference.
    Enjoy the small achievements, then repeat them.

    Everyone throws around the word "journey", but "lifestyle upgrade" is far more descriptive.
    You aren't travelling toward a destination- you are re-defining the new you, and your body will transform to match. It will take time. Stick with it. You can do this.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,629 Member
    edited June 14
    Seven pounds in 3 weeks is quite fast. I don't know your current weight, but someone well over 200 pounds can probably safely lose 2 pounds a week for a while, and still keep normal energy and strength.

    Fast loss can be a trap: Hard to stick with long enough to lose a meaningful total amount of weight, increases health risks, increases potential for fatigue to bleed movement (so calorie expenditure) out of everyday life in subtle but meaningful ways.

    Shows like Biggest Loser, tabloid headlines, and the blogosphere all feed those myths about losing 20 pounds in a month (or whatever). Let's look at that kind of claim, just as an example.

    To lose 20 pounds in a month, a person would have to eat 2500 fewer calories daily on average than the number of calories they burn, or burn that many more calories than they eat by adding more activity (exercise or any other kind of movement).

    The average woman's maintenance calories are around 2500 calories daily (USA data). Therefore, the average woman would need to eat zero, OR add a multi-mile daily run while holding food constant, OR a combination, to lose 20 pounds in a month. (For a 200-pound woman, it would be roughly 3.4 hours of running at 5 mph to burn 2500 calories. The exercise needn't be running, but that's a fairly time-efficient calorie burner to use as an example.)

    The arithmetic of super fast loss just doesn't work.

    To lose two pounds a week, it takes eating 1000 fewer calories daily (or moving that much more, or a combination). If we use that statistically average woman again, she'd need to eat about 1500 calories daily (2500-1000) or (at 200 pounds) add about an 80 minute daily run at 5mph, or some combination.

    Those numbers are true whether the person is counting the calories, or using some other diet/exercise method. (Calorie counting just makes the numbers explicit; it isn't magically or universally a better or worse method than others.)

    That 2 pounds a week arithmetic is hard enough, but it starts to come within the range of possible . . . though honestly, it'd probably be hard to stick with consistently for the 6 months plus that it would take to lose a total of about 50 pounds. On top of that, as a person gets lighter, calorie needs decrease, so it's actually going to require eating less (or moving even more), later in the process, to keep losing at the same fast (2 pounds a week) pace.

    Slow but steady loss can therefore possibly get a person to goal weight in less calendar time than theoretically fast loss that involves deprivation-triggered over-eating, breaks in the action, or even giving up altogether because it's just too hard.

    As a bonus, slower loss can give a person time to experiment and learn sustainable new habits that not only get them to goal weight, but help them stay there long term without relying on white-knuckled willpower every single second. (Many people find maintenance harder than loss, and around 80%+ of people who lose weight regain.)

    I'm not trying to be discouraging. The effort to reach a healthy weight is IME very, very worthwhile.

    I'm trying to be real. I was overweight to obese for around 30 years, took around a year to get to a healthy weight by calorie counting, and have been in a healthy range for around 8 years since. (That happened while I was in menopause, 59+ y/o, and severely hypothyroid (medicated), if that matters as context.)

    For me, the subjective quality of life improvement has been HUGE, and that's without even getting into the health benefits of solidly normal blood pressure, cholesterol, etc. I want that for everyone, and most particularly here, I want that for YOU.

    You are making fast progress. If you find that sustainable long-term, if it helps you develop new habits, then you're doing fine. If you reach a point where slower loss would be more realistic, slow the bus down.

    You can do this. Keep at it. Only giving up fails.

    I'm cheering for you!
  • 1fitgal2
    1fitgal2 Posts: 3 Member
    Slow and steady wins the race!! That used to be my motto and I have to use it now too. Losing weight is so hard, but keeping it off is even harder!! Just stay motivated with others here.