Allocated calories

When the calories are allocated, do they assume you will cheat a bit, or not quite get the measurements right?
I measurements everything I eat properly, and try to eat as near to my calories allocation as possible. Some days I may be a little under, some days I'm right on the mark. If I eat out, or somewhere thag I can't measure the calories, I guesstimate, but I'm losing weight much faster than the 1lb a week I'm going for. It's not really a problem, except at my age, I fear my skin won't shrink back fast enough to keep up! 😬
I believe I have my activity level set correctly.
Answers
-
MFP assumes correct logging, no margin of error. BUT it also assumes you are statistically average with regards to your metabolism: they use a formula based on averages of the human population (depending on sex, age, height etc) but this means that part of the population actually is (slightly or quite a lot) above or below that calculated number.
This could be the case for you - your metabolism could be faster than average. If you're already past the first few weeks (where water weight losses skew the picture a bit) I would suggest choosing a slower rate of loss to arrive at the rate you actually want. If you've only been losing weight for a couple of weeks, you may want to wait a bit to see if the rate stabilises.
3
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 396.5K Introduce Yourself
- 44.2K Getting Started
- 260.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.6K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 449 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.5K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions