Why are US meal portions so big??

1568101121

Replies

  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    I kinda want multiple plates of Mexican food now.

    I know, I'm feeling really shortchanged here. We've obviously been going to the wrong Mexican restaurants.

    The sad part is that I was in Texas for a few months last year, ate Mexican food several times, and still didn't get it on multiple plates. :grumble:
    I live in TX, have for my whole life... and yes, you can get mexican entrees on multiple plates. They usually bring the tortillas separately from the fajita meat, which is separate from the "fixin's" (cheese, veggies, etc). pretty common practice here in TX for the fajita meat to be on its own cast iron (very hot) serving skillet, sizzling as it arrives... ok, dinner plans made. cheers!

    The last Mexican meal (in the US, I am not from there) I had it was all on one plate and the juice from the beans made my tacos all soggy. I would have preferred separate plates.
  • smantha32
    smantha32 Posts: 6,990 Member

    I'm in Texas, and I almost always go splits on food with friends and I've never been charged a buck to do it. Maybe that's specific to certain regions.

    There are a couple places here though where you have to bring your own wine if you want wine and they charge you a few bucks to open it and that chaps me a little. lol

    Haha, same thing here! The corkage fee is ridiculous in a little town called Tomball near Houston. $25! On a $9 bottle of wine you brought yourself? My friend used to threaten to sneak in a flask of merlot.

    Holy sh#t!!! i get pissed when they want to charge 3 bucks to do it!!! :noway:
  • joshdann
    joshdann Posts: 618 Member
    for what it's worth, I once had sushi (the best sushi I've ever had, tbqh) in Washington DC. It was a $100 meal and it came on no less than 11 plates. It was probably almost 1000 calories, too. I wish I could do that again soon.
  • realme56
    realme56 Posts: 1,093 Member
    I kinda want multiple plates of Mexican food now.

    I had Mexican last weekend and a Margarita to go with it..... I was full to the top!! Plus you always get chips and salsa before your meal! Great salsa is not to be wasted!!!
  • whierd
    whierd Posts: 14,025 Member
    Things I want after reading this thread

    1) Otter's arm definition
    2) Wheird's "trolling" powers
    3) Fajitas. Massive plates of fajitas.

    The Secrets:

    1.Be a badass and lift heavy. Also jump off cliffs into pools of water to increase your badass factor.
    2. Be unapologetically intelligent. Normies will see it as trolling because they cannot follow.
    3. Go to Houston. I hear you cannot find Mexican food on less than 3 plates!
  • jayjay12345654321
    jayjay12345654321 Posts: 653 Member
    for what it's worth, I once had sushi (the best sushi I've ever had, tbqh) in Washington DC. It was a $100 meal and it came on no less than 11 plates. It was probably almost 1000 calories, too. I wish I could do that again soon.

    There's a place in Tokyo run by master sushi chef Jiro Ono that charges $300 per person. No menu, you book a reservation, show up and pay. He feeds you what he feels like making the rest of the night. The restaurant only seats 10 people. Jiro is 85 years old and supposed to be the best in Japan.
  • hilts1969
    hilts1969 Posts: 465 Member
    I've just returned from a holiday in California and was amazed at the portion sizes on all the meals I had when eating in restaurants. I mentioned this to an American friend and he just replied that the US was the land of plenty and they had to support their farmers. He then left half of his stack of pancakes and it was thrown away - what is the sense of that?? Portions in the UK are much smaller and yet we have a weight problem here too.

    I have only met one american that wasn't fat and she was actually canadian, i blame oprah
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,989 Member
    Frequency and "value" for money spent drive the restaurant businesses in the US. The "more" you can get for your money, the better the value so practically every restaurant serves large portions to compete. I always split food with my wife when we eat out saving calories and money. Oh and it helps keep me slimmer too.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • PikaKnight
    PikaKnight Posts: 34,971 Member
    Frequency and "value" for money spent drive the restaurant businesses in the US. The "more" you can get for your money, the better the value so practically every restaurant serves large portions to compete. I always split food with my wife when we eat out saving calories and money. Oh and it helps keep me slimmer too.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    Yeah, but some places kick you out if you try to do that.
  • American size 10 for a lady is.. slim, here in UK you are 14-16 and overweight. It's a different world.

    American size 10 long on my 5'8" frame IS slim. My hip bones wouldn't fit in anything smaller than an 8. Different people have different body types, doesn't matter what country you're from.
    I would call a US10 a UK12-14 which I agree would be slim on my 5'8.5" frame! I have proper childbearing hips so I just wouldn't be able to get below that and look healthy, I don't think. Right now I'm a UK 14-16 so I guess a US12? My Banana Republic suit jackets are US 10s.

    I like to get children's portions when I can - I used to work at McDonald's and I sold a lot of 'top secret Happy Meals' which are the Happy Meal in a normal paper bag rather than the cartoony box :p
    American size 10 for a lady is.. slim, here in UK you are 14-16 and overweight. It's a different world.

    You can tell by someone's size whether they are overweight?

    Well, here in the UK a 14 or 16 is certainly perceived by many to be 'big' - which may be because we possibly have a historically shorter population than in the US due to more rationing during the 1940s and early 50s? (no idea if that theory has any basis in fact, just throwing it out there!)

    i'll bet a Big Mac in the UK is exactly the same size as a Big Mac in the USA, but of course that'll just be dismissed as the exception that proves the rule... :facepalm:

    Nope. US (and Canada) Big Macs have about 50 calories more than UK Big Macs, according to Mcdonald's website(s). Curiously, the UK Big Mac has twice(!) the sodium.

    Clearly, the products are somewhat customized for local preferences.

    calorie counts =/= portion sizes

    1 cup of 1% milk has fewer calories than 1 cup of 2% milk. identical portion sizes.

    let's see some data about the bun diameters of Big Macs between the USA and UK! :tongue:

    Cadbury's Creme Eggs are smaller in the US.

    Random fact!

    They're also not real Cadbury's - they're made by Hershey with Hershey 'chocolate.'
    I actually dislike eating salads at restaurants because 1) they are gigantic and will never eat it all and 2) they cost around $10-13 here in CT. A bowl of lettuce and some toppings is NOT worth it to me. A steak, on the other hand, I will gladly pay $ for.
    You can go to a fast food place and get a box of fried fatty goodness for IDK, like $6-10.

    I agree with this - My parents think nothing of spending £10 on a salad when we go to Pizza Express, for instance... No! If I'm spending that much on a meal I want lots of food!
  • ereck44
    ereck44 Posts: 1,170 Member
    Haha I know what you mean, the portion sizes are ridiculous here. I guess its because people demand it and the restaurants want to bring in more people with the all you can eat buffets and giant portion sizes. What's good is that most restaurants nowadays, even fast food places, now offer healthy options as well (i.e. salads instead of fries, etc) so if you're conscious about things like that you generally will have some options. But I agree the portion sizes here are pretty ridiculous haha!

    Yes, thank goodness that most places are offering low cal options and actual nutritional content of their meals. Haven't eaten at McDonald's or other fast food spots in months for that reason. It's crazy how much crap is in our food. Now, I can go out to a restaurant and have better options and know what is going into my body...for the most part.

    McDonalds has a few fairly low cal options.

    spreadsheet_zps4e82d96d.jpg
    How many of these foods (ESP. McDonald's) were added to the menu after the movie "Supersize Me" . By the way, I am a huge Morgan Spur lock fan! Anyway, thanks for posting!
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    The entire Mcdonalds Value Menu is also in the low-calorie categorie. McDouble and Fries for $2 and 500-ish calories.

    Or for the same price you can do the McGangBanger.
  • redheaddee
    redheaddee Posts: 2,005 Member
    Silly me, I thought that my fat @ss was due to the poor food choices and sheer amount of food from any and all sources that I used to shovel into my gaping hole. I am so pleased to see that it is not my fault, but rather the American restaurant for serving huge freaking portions. Excellent, now who can I sue?
  • Ang108
    Ang108 Posts: 1,711 Member
    I kinda want multiple plates of Mexican food now.

    I know, I'm feeling really shortchanged here. We've obviously been going to the wrong Mexican restaurants.

    The sad part is that I was in Texas for a few months last year, ate Mexican food several times, and still didn't get it on multiple plates. :grumble:
    I live in TX, have for my whole life... and yes, you can get mexican entrees on multiple plates. They usually bring the tortillas separately from the fajita meat, which is separate from the "fixin's" (cheese, veggies, etc). pretty common practice here in TX for the fajita meat to be on its own cast iron (very hot) serving skillet, sizzling as it arrives... ok, dinner plans made. cheers!

    The last Mexican meal (in the US, I am not from there) I had it was all on one plate and the juice from the beans made my tacos all soggy. I would have preferred separate plates.


    Here in Mexico it is frowned upon to have all the food on one plate. Usually the rice is served alone on a plate before the entrée, which comes afterwards with tortillas in an extra container to keep them warm. Only poor people ( who basically live of rice and beans ) and I like to have their rice touch the stew and the beans on the same plate. I can't say, but wonder if this little part of Mexican food culture has maybe some bearing on how Mexican meals are served in the US.
  • hilts1969
    hilts1969 Posts: 465 Member
    A recent survey stated that 98% of the worlds obese population were american, this is quite shocking if you think about it. most users on this site appear to be from the US so maybe things are changing
  • whierd
    whierd Posts: 14,025 Member
    A recent survey stated that 98% of the worlds obese population were american, this is quite shocking if you think about it. most users on this site appear to be from the US so maybe things are changing

    I doubt the accuracy.
  • joshdann
    joshdann Posts: 618 Member
    Or for the same price you can do the McGangBanger.
    Is that where they just take your money and you get nothing in return? Could be the healthiest way to visit McD's
  • Deipneus
    Deipneus Posts: 1,861 Member
    I mentioned this to an American friend and he just replied that the US was the land of plenty and they had to support their farmers.
    I don't know how it started but I hate it. Not all U.S. restaurants do it but a lot of them do.
  • hilts1969
    hilts1969 Posts: 465 Member
    A recent survey stated that 98% of the worlds obese population were american, this is quite shocking if you think about it. most users on this site appear to be from the US so maybe things are changing

    I doubt the accuracy.

    The north korean times are usualy spot on
  • A recent survey stated that 98% of the worlds obese population were american, this is quite shocking if you think about it. most users on this site appear to be from the US so maybe things are changing

    Sorry, I'm callin' BS. The current US population is, if memory serves, about 320 million, about half of which are obese. That makes 160,000,000 obese people in the US. So...are there only a little more than 160,000,000 obese people in a world population of 6 billion? Don't think so, given that India, at least, also has an obesity problem, and the population of India is about 4x that of America.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    A recent survey stated that 98% of the worlds obese population were american, this is quite shocking if you think about it. most users on this site appear to be from the US so maybe things are changing

    I doubt the accuracy.



    “Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything. 14% of people know that.”
    Homer Simpson
  • jennifer_417
    jennifer_417 Posts: 12,344 Member
    How else are we supposed to stay so fat? Geez...
  • pseudomuffin
    pseudomuffin Posts: 1,058 Member
    Depends on what you order & where you eat, my friend!
  • VBnotbitter
    VBnotbitter Posts: 820 Member
    Another person who has lived in the UK and US here. Again only speaking from personal experience I'd say portion sizes vary from restaurant to restaurant rather than by country. Ever gone to a Sunday carvery in the UK and seen the mounds of food people pile their plates with there. Hence why, as stated by the OPs first post, obesity is a problem there as well.

    What I have also noticed is that rude and obnoxious people are found every where as well, though what it is about this thread which seems to be drawing them in, I'm not sure. For the record Otter has amazingly strong and defined arms and Whierd is erudite and perspicacious :wink:
  • hilts1969
    hilts1969 Posts: 465 Member
    A recent survey stated that 98% of the worlds obese population were american, this is quite shocking if you think about it. most users on this site appear to be from the US so maybe things are changing

    Sorry, I'm callin' BS. The current US population is, if memory serves, about 320 million, about half of which are obese. That makes 160,000,000 obese people in the US. So...are there only a little more than 160,000,000 obese people in a world population of 6 billion? Don't think so, given that India, at least, also has an obesity problem, and the population of India is about 4x that of America.

    In fairness it also said that americans also had the lowest tolerance to sarcasm in the developed world, i think these north koreans may be making these things up
  • TheRealParisLove
    TheRealParisLove Posts: 1,907 Member
    1. The US government subsidizes food production, making food crazy cheap (but not of good quality).
    2. Americans have been conditioned to think that bigger is better. Bigger and cheaper is best.
    3. To get smaller portions we have to pay more. For instance, if you want your meal split with half in a box to go, or wish to share your meal with your dinner mate, there is a surcharge of $1 or more at most establishments.
    4. At fast food places the surcharge for smaller portions can double the price of the meal due to the increased labor cost in a custom order. Just try getting a half-sized banana split at Dairy Queen. It'll cost you nearly $9 to buy the individual ingredients.
    5. We kind of like it this way.

    I'm in Texas, and I almost always go splits on food with friends and I've never been charged a buck to do it. Maybe that's specific to certain regions.

    There are a couple places here though where you have to bring your own wine if you want wine and they charge you a few bucks to open it and that chaps me a little. lol

    Here in Oregon, most places, even fast food joints, have a wine list, lol! We're like Napa Valley North. :drinker:
  • jayjay12345654321
    jayjay12345654321 Posts: 653 Member
    Here in Mexico it is frowned upon to have all the food on one plate. Usually the rice is served alone on a plate before the entrée, which comes afterwards with tortillas in an extra container to keep them warm. Only poor people ( who basically live of rice and beans ) and I like to have their rice touch the stew and the beans on the same plate. I can't say, but wonder if this little part of Mexican food culture has maybe some bearing on how Mexican meals are served in the US.

    I figured it had to do with South Texas' proximity to Mexico and the high Hispanic population in the Valley region. I've been to a "Mexican" restaurant in Canada. They had never heard of enchiladas. Makes me wonder how far off we are on other cultures like Thai food that aren't even on the same continent.
  • Mr_Starr
    Mr_Starr Posts: 139 Member
    I have noticed a race by lower and mid range restaurants - especially chains - to give bigger and bigger portions. Now days i just divide the plate by a half or even a third before i start eating. I then leave the rest to be thrown away. The only real "problem" is that i usually don't want to pack up what I did not eat. Sometimes my dinner companions, or even the "servers" seem to get terribly offended when I don't want to pack up the leftovers. For restaurants that serve massive portions, the food really isn't that inspiring to want to eat again. Also when travelling it is just inconvenient and i am forced to go back to hotel to store it. The same at home i guess... It is difficult to go on with your evening when you have to carry the leftovers with you for the night.

    The good news is I see things are changing. A number of local "non-chain" restaurants are starting to serve "right size" meals. At least here in the NW ( Portland , Seattle, San Francisco/Bay Area ) there is a trend towards "small plates" options.


    48403347.png
  • pseudomuffin
    pseudomuffin Posts: 1,058 Member
    A recent survey stated that 98% of the worlds obese population were american, this is quite shocking if you think about it. most users on this site appear to be from the US so maybe things are changing

    I doubt the accuracy.

    Ooh, let me help. :smokin:

    If y'all want some statistics, here's the obesity % per population of the world. The US led last year but Mexico and the UK are catching up. (1)

    ScreenShot2013-09-14at73948PM_zpsbe114fb1.png

    Also, according to the World Health Organization, "In 2008, more than 1.4 billion adults, 20 and older, were overweight. Of these over 200 million men and nearly 300 million women were obese." (2)

    As of 2012 the US population estimated around 313,914,040. I'm not good at math but if 30.6% of people in the US are obese and that number amounts to 98% of the world obesity numbers, there's more than 7 billion people who are in a healthy weight range in the world (the estimated current world population being 7,111,379,600 as of 7:51 PM CST (3)

    So your "recent survey" can go suck eggs.

    Citations:

    1: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_obe-health-obesity
    2: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/
    3: http://www.census.gov/popclock/
  • I like large proportions in restaurants! I eat what I can there and the rest goes in a "to go" box and I eat it later on. That's the best part a meal to eat later.