We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!
Body Fat percentage higher than I thought!? :-(

mancgolfer
Posts: 12 Member
Hi, I started losing weight from the 1st Jan this year and was 249lbs and 38% bf, as of this morning I was 210lbs and 26%bf which is great.
From that I have worked out if I keep the same lean mass (which I seems to have done throughout) and drop another 2 stone, I'll be 184lbs and around 16%bf. I've trained for a 10K and done Stronglifts throughout the year so I'm 70/30 cardio to weight training split.
I'm using a tanita body fat monitor which is around 10 years old and although it may not be entirely accurate, it does show progression.
My mum bought a new fat monitor a few of weeks ago and I tried it today, to my horror, I was 32%bf! This reading was taken within a few minutes of my own monitor reading and I had not had and breakfast or water between readings.
This has just knocked me back a bit as I thought I was further along than maybe I am. I just wonder which one is the accurate one?
My stats are:
height: 5'11.5"
weight: 210lbs
neck: 16"
waist: 43"
hips: 41"
If the newer fat monitor is more accurate, so be it, but I just like to know where I am. Any help appreciated :-)
From that I have worked out if I keep the same lean mass (which I seems to have done throughout) and drop another 2 stone, I'll be 184lbs and around 16%bf. I've trained for a 10K and done Stronglifts throughout the year so I'm 70/30 cardio to weight training split.
I'm using a tanita body fat monitor which is around 10 years old and although it may not be entirely accurate, it does show progression.
My mum bought a new fat monitor a few of weeks ago and I tried it today, to my horror, I was 32%bf! This reading was taken within a few minutes of my own monitor reading and I had not had and breakfast or water between readings.
This has just knocked me back a bit as I thought I was further along than maybe I am. I just wonder which one is the accurate one?
My stats are:
height: 5'11.5"
weight: 210lbs
neck: 16"
waist: 43"
hips: 41"
If the newer fat monitor is more accurate, so be it, but I just like to know where I am. Any help appreciated :-)
0
Replies
-
The electrical inducance meters are notoriously innacurate. You're going to get better results with a tape measure or, better yet, a skin fold caliper.0
-
Do yourself a favor and through the body fat % device away.
Congrats on your fatloss. Keep up the good work. If you want to get an accurate base line go get yourself tested at a BodPod place. Google it. This will give you an accurate baseline.
Most people vastly underestimate what their body fat % is.
Koing0 -
Thanks for the advice guys, think I'll just keep on trucking and try to hit my goal weight and let bf% take care of itself.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.6K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 260.5K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 444 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4.1K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 1.3K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.8K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions