We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Stupid Question Time Re: VO2max

minizebu
minizebu Posts: 2,716 Member
edited February 4 in Fitness and Exercise
I was reading an article that referenced VO2max and I'm just trying to translate it in my head in order to help myself understand the ideas being presented.

So, I found the following web page with a VO2max calculator that does not require any physical exertion. (I know that this isn't going to be the most accurate thing in the world. I am just trying to get a basic understanding going, here.) Here's the link:

http://www.shapesense.com/fitness-exercise/calculators/vo2max-calculator.aspx

So, now for the stupid question...Am I calculating this correctly?

I visited the doctor recently and my pulse was 66 beats per minute. So, if I divide that by 3, I get 22 beats in 20 seconds, and if I plug that into the calculator along with my age it gives me an estimated VO2 max of 41 ml//kg/min. When I click the explanation link it reports that rate to be "excellent", which I am dubious about. I do walk a lot, but I am not an athlete.

I could also dig out my heart rate monitor, later. I think that I remember reading in the instructions that there is a VO2max estimate setting. But right now I can't do it. And, if I am really feeling motivated, later, I could do the one mile walk test. But, for now, I am just trying to quickly wrap my head around the article.

Bottom line, did I do the rough estimate calculation above correctly?

Replies

  • I wonder about this too
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    Bottom line, did I do the rough estimate calculation above correctly?

    You did the calculation correctly, but I just did it for myself. It gave a result 50% higher than a more traditional method I used just last week.

    I would't trust the number.
  • minizebu
    minizebu Posts: 2,716 Member
    You did the calculation correctly, but I just did it for myself. It gave a result 50% higher than a more traditional method I used just last week.

    I would't trust the number.

    What was the more traditional method that you used?
This discussion has been closed.