Useful quiz: Do you know enough to maintain by eye?
nxd10
Posts: 4,570 Member
I just found this quiz from the NIH. I found it interesting because it shows the difference in portion sizes now and 20 years ago.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/obesity/wecan/portion/portion.cgi?action=question&number=1
More importantly for us, it quizzes you on how many calories pretty standard foods have and how much exercise you'd need to work them off.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/obesity/wecan/portion/portion.cgi?action=question&number=1
More importantly for us, it quizzes you on how many calories pretty standard foods have and how much exercise you'd need to work them off.
0
Replies
-
this is neat but it would be more helpful if they displayed the weight of the person performing the exercise BEFORE you answered.0
-
Very Cool! I eat a lot for work and this helps!0
-
Fascinating! This is a great tool...thanks!0
-
It would also help if they display a food picture in line with the question. I've personally never seen a fast food hamburger as thick as the one they show. I don't think they mentioned they were referring to the average fast food hamburger, either.0
-
this is neat but it would be more helpful if they displayed the weight of the person performing the exercise BEFORE you answered.
they do, in the bottom right..it says based on XXXX pound person0 -
this is neat but it would be more helpful if they displayed the weight of the person performing the exercise BEFORE you answered.
THIS!
I always over estimated how much I would need to work out and was over for how many calories in many of the items. SO I guess I would lose weight and not maintain since I over estimated 90%.0 -
It would also help if they display a food picture in line with the question. I've personally never seen a fast food hamburger as thick as the one they show. I don't think they mentioned they were referring to the average fast food hamburger, either.
Yeah. I stopped bothering with the quiz at that point. They're just using random stock images.0 -
I did very good at guessing the calories in the food, however not so much on the calories burned.0
-
I did very good at guessing the calories in the food, however not so much on the calories burned.
Same here ^.0 -
It would be nice if you could input your own weight for the calorie burned...I have no idea, nor do I care how many calories a 130 Lb person would burn doing X, Y, or Z...I'm 180 Lbs. That said, I did pretty well estimating both the food and exercise..missed one food and two exercises and in both cases I erred on the side of caution.0
-
Interesting, but skewed. It would be more beneficial if they said things like 'in 19xx, the average portion size for fries was <x amt> and today, in 2013, it is <y amt>' - how many more calories do you think that is? Or SOMETHING --because they show a crappy cheeseburger pix and then an obviously not crappy one and guess what, I can get the same McD's cheeseburger today as shown in the 'before' picture. I just have more options to be ridiculously awful to myself (or awesome, depending on perspective at the moment!). Sizes have definitely grown, such as a standard serving for a meal for a plate of pasta then v. now, but how they went about it just seemed like apples to tumbleweed comparisons versus apples to apples.0
-
I got them all right except the hamburger, because that looks like at least a half pound burger in the picture, not an average fast food burger.0
-
I barely got any. The turkey sandwich was ridiculous, 1000 calories? I regularly get one at Subway and it's never even close to that. Same with the meatballs and spaghetti, I have my 85g plus 3 115 calorie meatballs and it's in the 700 calorie range, not over 1000 like they said.0
-
It would also help if they display a food picture in line with the question. I've personally never seen a fast food hamburger as thick as the one they show. I don't think they mentioned they were referring to the average fast food hamburger, either.
Yeah. I stopped bothering with the quiz at that point. They're just using random stock images.
Yep, that bad boy was at least a half-pounder, which would be more like 800 calories. Portion distortion indeed - in their images!0 -
I did very good at guessing the calories in the food, however not so much on the calories burned.
Same here ^.
Got all the calories in the food right....missed about half of the calories burned though. I kept estimating it would take longer to burn that much....0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions