Viewing the message boards in:

what should i use for walking at 4.3 mph?

Posts: 174 Member
edited February 8 in Fitness and Exercise
When I try to log my cardio, MFP offers either 4.0 mph or 4.5 mph. What should I use for walking 4.3 mph? Or should I just use 4.0 mph and underestimate a bit?

Also, I work out with a personal training an hour twice a week. She basically has me do squats, kettle bell swings, lunges, stuff like that for an hour. I do have a minute or two of rest between sets. I sweat a little, but I never feel like my heart rate gets very high. I asked her what she estimated the calorie burn to be for that hour, and she said around 400. However, it seems it should be a lot less than that. It takes me an hour of fast walking and lots of sweat to burn 400 cals in an hour. WHen I enter circuit training on MFP, for 60 minutes, it shows over 600 cals burned, That really can't be right. Any guesses as to what I might burn in an hour of strength training? I'm 41, female, 5'8" and 180 lbs. Thanks for your help.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Replies

  • Posts: 406 Member
    I would use what you find to be the closest one. Not that big of a deal. Just keep moving. :-)
  • Posts: 951 Member
    I would use 4.0. The calorie count is always a bit generous in my opinion.
  • Posts: 321 Member
    Either walk slower or faster then you don't have a problem. :smile:
  • Posts: 471 Member
    I prefer to underestimate. I'd log 4 mph
  • Posts: 1,312 Member
    Buy a heart rate monitor, so you have a more accurate estimate. Even HRMs are somewhat inaccurate, but they will give you a better idea of your calorie burn than MFP.
  • Posts: 4 Member
    Use Runkeeper on your phone. It syncs all your data automatically with MFP. I have been using them both every day for the last three years and they are both superb allies to the battle of the bulge!
This discussion has been closed.