HRM Help
Nyksta
Posts: 241 Member
Hello all
I got a HRM/watch for Christmas (Polar FT7) and have used it for running and stationary bike. It has given me a target HR of between 120 and 134 to with an upper HR of 190.
The thing is my HR goes well over 120/130 when exercising unless I go really really slowly. Usually between 140 and 160 which it tells me is "fitness"..... to be in the "burn fat" range I near enough just need to walk. Staying in the "burn fat" range also means less calories or exercising longer to burn the same number of calories.
So. My questions is I suppose, do I NEED to be in the "burn fat" range when running or should I just do my normal pace that puts me into the "fitness" range.
I know I don't need to run to lose weight so I guess I'm doing it more to get the extra exercise calories and improve fitness? But obviously if it can help towards the weight then I want that too.
Any advise would be gratefully received
Thanks
Nyk
I got a HRM/watch for Christmas (Polar FT7) and have used it for running and stationary bike. It has given me a target HR of between 120 and 134 to with an upper HR of 190.
The thing is my HR goes well over 120/130 when exercising unless I go really really slowly. Usually between 140 and 160 which it tells me is "fitness"..... to be in the "burn fat" range I near enough just need to walk. Staying in the "burn fat" range also means less calories or exercising longer to burn the same number of calories.
So. My questions is I suppose, do I NEED to be in the "burn fat" range when running or should I just do my normal pace that puts me into the "fitness" range.
I know I don't need to run to lose weight so I guess I'm doing it more to get the extra exercise calories and improve fitness? But obviously if it can help towards the weight then I want that too.
Any advise would be gratefully received
Thanks
Nyk
0
Replies
-
Ignore the burn fat range polar are a little obsessed over this. Just worry about the overall calorie burn which higher intensity will give you0
-
My wife and I each got one for Christmas as well (the Polar FT7).
Here is how I look at it, it is a more accurate way of looking at the calories that I am personally burning verses, an estimated average based on the general population. I also look plainly at the calories in and calories out aspect of my workout/training session and the Polar FT7 HRM helps me identify more accurately what I am burning.
I have looked into what you are talking about the fat burn range and the fitness range, maybe there is truth to it maybe not I do not know for sure either way, what I do know is that if I am burning calories I must be doing something right.
Don't get hung up the minute details of the HRM just use it as another tool in your training.0 -
Thank you both! This is very helpful The whole reason I wanted the HRM was to get a more accurate number with regards to calories burned so I guess I won't worry about the rest.
I just kept thinking if I run any slower to burn fat I won't be running at all! lol
I'm looking forward to taking it swimming because I believe it can be used in the pool?
Nyk x0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions