Victoria Secret Girl or Porn Girl?

1…5681011…13

Replies

  • KenziesFrenzies
    KenziesFrenzies Posts: 1,014 Member
    Alright, I'll play. I'm going to take porn girl, because not all porn stars look the same (by a long shot), there's variety in their body types. No shame to the tall and extremely slender VS models, it's just not what I want to look like physically.

    Judge away, but I'm narrowing down my answer to a *MILF* porn star, since they tend to be on the curvaceous side. :D
  • SunofaBeach14
    SunofaBeach14 Posts: 4,899 Member
    miranda-kerr-underwear-4.jpg
    AqL2ElFCQAAx0YG.jpg
    13649967284ac21.jpg

    Why is this even a competition?

    Competition?

    Hell, I'm just here for the view.
  • moosegt35
    moosegt35 Posts: 1,296 Member
    Neither to be completely honest but some Porn girl & some VS Girls look good. IMO most VS girls are too skinny, but some do look quite yummy. A lot of porn girls look like plastic & make up, but there are some that are hot.

    My fave is 5'5" to 5'8" girls who weigh about 140

    ^^^^^ he knows whats up!

    Having a height and weight specification for potential partners is 'knowing what's up'?

    *sigh*

    yea, d@mn anyone who has preferences.
  • wolfsbayne
    wolfsbayne Posts: 3,116 Member
    Neither to be completely honest but some Porn girl & some VS Girls look good. IMO most VS girls are too skinny, but some do look quite yummy. A lot of porn girls look like plastic & make up, but there are some that are hot.

    My fave is 5'5" to 5'8" girls who weigh about 140

    ^^^^^ he knows whats up!

    Having a height and weight specification for potential partners is 'knowing what's up'?

    *sigh*

    yea, d@mn anyone who has preferences.

    My thoughts, exactly.
  • moosegt35
    moosegt35 Posts: 1,296 Member
    Not trying to 'body shame' just curious..

    I don't like porn it's unrealistic and gross!... So that's kinda where I'm coming from.. the boyfriend likes porn, he's thinks the VS girl are too skinny like some of you...

    I just would rather be told I look like a VS model/associated with than a porn girl, as they are VERY plastic and just gross..in my opinion at least in the few porn's I have seen so

    interesting mix :)

    Calm down, lassie.... I think what you're boyfriend means is he doesn't like Anorexic women. When he says he preferes 'Porn Women' he probably just means - Not Anorexic Model. I'm sure he isn't trying to imply to you he wants a Plastic Pamela Anderson Doll. He probably like you better than the VS girls

    So VS models are anorexic just because they're skinny? Because you can toottally tell if someone has a mental or eating disorder just by looking at them :huh:

    This thread is so full of fail. I shouldn't be surprised any more, but I still hate reading crap like this. :mad:

    Sorry, in a bad mood, leaving now.

    Careful not to let the door hit you in the @s$
  • KenziesFrenzies
    KenziesFrenzies Posts: 1,014 Member
    Dang, this thread has a VERY specific idea of what a porn actress looks like. You do realize they don't ALL have ginormous basketball-boobs and fat-injected lips, right? Right?? There are actresses with both natural boobs and fake boobs, pale skin and fake tans, extremely skinny and super curvy, etc. etc.

    Some of the most successful ones out there have NONE of those "gross" or "plastic" features you keep describing. Jeez louise.
  • moosegt35
    moosegt35 Posts: 1,296 Member
    Porn girls know how to please

    And no other woman does?

    Strong logic.

    hard to find the feminists in this thread. ROFL
  • moosegt35
    moosegt35 Posts: 1,296 Member
    How about the everyday girls? You know.. the ones on planet earth? :laugh:

    No porn girls or VS models on planet earth? Where on earth do these things take place? <mind blown>
  • Miss_james1990
    Miss_james1990 Posts: 214 Member
    To be honest .... I'd bang both! You get all kinds of beautiful woman!! I can't really answer this question unless you give me a specific VS and a specific pornstar!
  • KenziesFrenzies
    KenziesFrenzies Posts: 1,014 Member
    To be honest .... I'd bang both! You get all kinds of beautiful woman!! I can't really answer this question unless you give me a specific VS and a specific pornstar!

    Thank you! It's easy to generalize both groups of women, but they're not all exactly the same. (Especially the pornstars, they come in literally ALL shapes and sizes.)
  • eric_sg61
    eric_sg61 Posts: 2,925 Member
    Neither to be completely honest but some Porn girl & some VS Girls look good. IMO most VS girls are too skinny, but some do look quite yummy. A lot of porn girls look like plastic & make up, but there are some that are hot.

    My fave is 5'5" to 5'8" girls who weigh about 140

    ^^^^^ he knows whats up!

    Having a height and weight specification for potential partners is 'knowing what's up'?

    *sigh*

    yea, d@mn anyone who has preferences.
    When men have requirements it is called "body shaming", when women have requirements it is called "preferences".
  • Miss_james1990
    Miss_james1990 Posts: 214 Member
    Exactly! Like porn does not have specific requirements... It has different categories of women where as I think we know the basis of VS is tall and slim!
  • KatyMarie1984
    KatyMarie1984 Posts: 114 Member
    If i could look like anyone in the whole world it would be Irina Shayk, massive girl crush..... shes smoking hot! so VS.
  • aliencheesecake
    aliencheesecake Posts: 569 Member
    I don't plan on modeling underwear, nor do I plan on being in porn... neither? I'll take a 130 lbs version of myself. :drinker:

    Good answer!!
  • KenziesFrenzies
    KenziesFrenzies Posts: 1,014 Member
    When men have requirements it is called "body shaming", when women have requirements it is called "preferences".

    I don't know about you, but the closest I've ever heard to a woman having physical preferences for a man is: "taller than me and in moderate to decent shape", NOT "6'3" and 170 pounds." :huh:
  • moosegt35
    moosegt35 Posts: 1,296 Member
    When men have requirements it is called "body shaming", when women have requirements it is called "preferences".

    I don't know about you, but the closest I've ever heard to a woman having physical preferences for a man is: "taller than me and in moderate to decent shape", NOT "6'3" and 170 pounds." :huh:

    So men's preferences can't be specific, got it.
  • theoncomingstorm2
    theoncomingstorm2 Posts: 22
    Neither
  • summertime_girl
    summertime_girl Posts: 3,945 Member
    Victoria's Secret for sure.
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    When men have requirements it is called "body shaming", when women have requirements it is called "preferences".

    I don't know about you, but the closest I've ever heard to a woman having physical preferences for a man is: "taller than me and in moderate to decent shape", NOT "6'3" and 170 pounds." :huh:

    actually, it's very common for women to insist that they won't date anyone under 6'.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2344324/Men-dont-stand-chance-women-6ft-Bad-luck-Tom-Cruise-Daniel-Radcliffe-Jack-Black-Seth-Green.html
  • MzManiak
    MzManiak Posts: 1,361 Member
    When men have requirements it is called "body shaming", when women have requirements it is called "preferences".

    I don't know about you, but the closest I've ever heard to a woman having physical preferences for a man is: "taller than me and in moderate to decent shape", NOT "6'3" and 170 pounds." :huh:

    actually, it's very common for women to insist that they won't date anyone under 6'.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2344324/Men-dont-stand-chance-women-6ft-Bad-luck-Tom-Cruise-Daniel-Radcliffe-Jack-Black-Seth-Green.html

    Not me! I'm only 5'1"... so, I'm good on that. :wink: lol

Categories