questions about HRM

Posts: 357 Member
edited February 11 in Fitness and Exercise
I just picked up a Polar FT4 Heart rate monitor and have a question as far as how I should log it. Is there a percentage error I should remove when logging it?

For example i just got finished working out and these are the stats:

Duration: 21 Min
carories: 311
average heart rate : 156
max heart rate : 167

Should i log 311, or deduct some to get a more accurate log? Or are the monitors pretty accurate?

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Replies

  • Posts: 4,926 Member
    Anything over 10 calories a minute makes me suspicious, unless you're very obese. I would at the least divide your BMR by 1440 minutes in a day to get a rough per-minute BMR estimate and subtract 21 times that from the 311. So if your BMR is around 2000, subtract 1.4 X 21 minutes, or around 30 calories.
  • Posts: 4,140 Member
    They are estimates. For example, my heart rate could be the same, but if I weigh 50 lbs more than you, I could be burning more calories for that effort. Or I could be in worse shape and be burning less.

    I do it like this: I take the reading and subtract 100 calories per hour (assuming my resting metabolism was approximately 2000 or nearly 100 calories per hour). This gives me a conservative base. I tweak it from time to time if I'm not seeing the fat loss I should be based on the numbers.

    Think of it like a speed-o-meter without numbers. You get a feel for where 65 mph is and go with it until you get more data that tells you it is too high or too low for that type of activity (roadway speed limit).
  • Posts: 9,532 Member
    It depends on the exercise, and your level of fitness. If you're reasonably fit, and the exercise was a 20 minute jog, it's probably not far off. If it was an Insanity (or whatever) workout, it is probably way over-estimating and you're better off cutting the number in half.
  • Posts: 357 Member
    my BMR is 2055.2 apparently?

    5'7, 210LBS 25 Years old

    It was 21 minutes of Jumping Rope
  • Posts: 4,926 Member
    http://www.mayoclinic.org/exercise/ART-20050999

    According to that table, your HRM might be about right. They list rope jumping as the same intensity as running 8mph, so it'd have to be pretty dang intense, I think.
  • Posts: 357 Member
    what is a good average heart rate to burn calories efficiently ? Is 156 a good number, or should I try to go a little harder next time
  • Posts: 509
    I work out at about 80% of my max heart rate because I can keep that rate up as long as I want, I also convert HRM calories to net removing calories you would have burnt anyway doing nothing using this calculator

    http://www.shapesense.com/fitness-exercise/calculators/net-versus-gross-calorie-burn-conversion-calculator.aspx
  • Posts: 357 Member
    I work out at about 80% of my max heart rate because I can keep that rate up as long as I want, I also convert HRM calories to net removing calories you would have burnt anyway doing nothing using this calculator

    http://www.shapesense.com/fitness-exercise/calculators/net-versus-gross-calorie-burn-conversion-calculator.aspx

    thanks!
  • Posts: 4,926 Member
    what is a good average heart rate to burn calories efficiently ? Is 156 a good number, or should I try to go a little harder next time
    The number will vary for everyone. I agree with pick a zone based on your max, or just use perceived exertion. You don't want to be able to easily sing but you don't want to be unable to talk in short sentences. And don't overthink it. The harder you work, the more you burn but the shorter you can go because it's uncomfortable. There are no magic zones and no dangerous ones.
This discussion has been closed.