Rat...

jofjltncb6

...and other animal studies are of limited usefulness to human health argue researchers in a study online in the British Medical Journal:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061215090857.htm

Discuss.

BeachGingerOnTheRocks

I was going to say TL;DR, but I did, and it was short.

Derp_Diggler

They don't do much for human disposition either. At least not around here.

sillyvalentine

I don't like where this is headed. It sounds like an pro argument for testing on larger animals. I am against all animal testing from tiny rats to large monkeys. It sounds like they want society to agree that they should be testing on larger animals to provide us with better information. I stick by my opinion that the only medical testing that should be done should be done on prison inmates, especially death sentence inmates. I mean, they're dead anyway, right? We have hundreds of thousands of rapists and murderers and paedophiles just sitting around on our dimes. Why not put them to good use?

MyChocolateDiet

had nothing to say b/c i came in on the assumption it was about tattle tales. snitches. and the like.

danasings

Derp_Diggler

I don't like where this is headed. It sounds like an pro argument for testing on larger animals. I am against all animal testing from tiny rats to large monkeys. It sounds like they want society to agree that they should be testing on larger animals to provide us with better information. I stick by my opinion that the only medical testing that should be done should be done on prison inmates, especially death sentence inmates. I mean, they're dead anyway, right? We have hundreds of thousands of rapists and murderers and paedophiles just sitting around on our dimes. Why not put them to good use?

BeachGingerOnTheRocks

I don't like where this is headed. It sounds like an pro argument for testing on larger animals. I am against all animal testing from tiny rats to large monkeys. It sounds like they want society to agree that they should be testing on larger animals to provide us with better information. I stick by my opinion that the only medical testing that should be done should be done on prison inmates, especially death sentence inmates. I mean, they're dead anyway, right? We have hundreds of thousands of rapists and murderers and paedophiles just sitting around on our dimes. Why not put them to good use?

*Jefferson takes out pen, scratches through 4th Amendment.*

"We aren't likely to need that one." He said.

sillyvalentine

I don't like where this is headed. It sounds like an pro argument for testing on larger animals. I am against all animal testing from tiny rats to large monkeys. It sounds like they want society to agree that they should be testing on larger animals to provide us with better information. I stick by my opinion that the only medical testing that should be done should be done on prison inmates, especially death sentence inmates. I mean, they're dead anyway, right? We have hundreds of thousands of rapists and murderers and paedophiles just sitting around on our dimes. Why not put them to good use?


*Jefferson takes out pen, scratches through 4th Amendment.*

"We aren't likely to need that one." He said.

LOL

Mr_Bad_Example

Master Splinter begs to differ.

Derp_Diggler

I don't like where this is headed. It sounds like an pro argument for testing on larger animals. I am against all animal testing from tiny rats to large monkeys. It sounds like they want society to agree that they should be testing on larger animals to provide us with better information. I stick by my opinion that the only medical testing that should be done should be done on prison inmates, especially death sentence inmates. I mean, they're dead anyway, right? We have hundreds of thousands of rapists and murderers and paedophiles just sitting around on our dimes. Why not put them to good use?

*Jefferson takes out pen, scratches through 4th Amendment.*

"We aren't likely to need that one." He said.

jofjltncb6

BinaryPulsar

:laugh: