difference in results - Nike+sensor vs. heart rate monitor

Options
gpies
gpies Posts: 56 Member
in Fitness and Exercise
Hi everyone - question for anyone that may have these - I recently purchased a Nike+ sensor and used it for my walk/run route. It stated I burned 360 calories. The same route showed about 280 on heart rate monitor. Ugh. Obviously, the sensor is not necessarily based on my heart rate so to speak but is tracking pace and miles (4 miles). So, the question is - which should I go with or should I take an average - or should I go on hrm because it may be more accurate? Suggestions?

Replies

  • jkohan
    jkohan Posts: 184 Member
    Options
    Always the HRM. The Nike Sensor is basing it upon a formula using your pace...but it means NOTHING unless you're tracking your HR.

    Good luck!
  • jrich1
    jrich1 Posts: 2,408 Member
    Options
    I would go with HRM, your HR does affect how many cals burned
  • iRun4wine
    iRun4wine Posts: 5,126
    Options
    Go with the HRM. The Nike + doesn't know if you're running uphill, nor does it monitor your heart. It's just a mathematical calculation based on your pace. But, obviously a 7:30 mile is going to burn more calories if it's uphill as opposed to on flat road.

Categories