My trainer told me watermelon is 'the worst fruit' for me.
amandakev88
Posts: 328 Member
I'm very sad. Very.
0
Replies
-
sounds wrong
what was the logic?0 -
sugar, i assume. it made me so sad. i thought it was mostly water, and its pretty low cal, so im confused as ****.0
-
your trainer sounds like he/she should stick to training and not fruit recommending.0
-
your trainer sounds like he/she should stick to training and not fruit recommending.
^ this.0 -
I've heard the same thing and if you investigate (see this link: http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/fruits-and-fruit-juices/2072/2) it gets an "A" rating. Eat and enjoy (imo). :flowerforyou:0
-
Your trainer was absent the day they taught "Don't say stupid things that show everyone how stupid you are" in trainer school.0
-
The majority of trainers are pretty clueless regarding nutrition and just perpetuate silly myths. I just hope the training is better than the nutrition advice0
-
If he is not an RD (Registered Dietician) then he probably doesn't have a clue. Watermelon is good for you but like anything in this world too much can be bad for you. Moderation is key0
-
If he is not an RD (Registered Dietician) then he probably doesn't have a clue. Watermelon is good for you but like anything in this world too much can be bad for you. Moderation is key
Thankfully, that moderation thing does not apply to things such as steak, single malt scotch, and redheads with tattoos. If it did, then what would be the point?0 -
I'm very sad. Very.
Yes, it's very sad when you discover you've been paying money for advice from someone who is so ignorant that he doesn't have any idea that he's ignorant.0 -
Watermelon has a lot of sugar in it, was told by my Registered Dietician. Can't eat it anymore as I'm diabetic.0
-
Keep the watermelon. Get a new trainer. Problem solved.
Unless you are a diabetic. Then talk to your doctor. But still get a new trainer.0 -
I'm very sad. Very.
Yes, it's very sad when you discover you've been paying money for advice from someone who is so ignorant that he doesn't have any idea that he's ignorant.
^ this!0 -
Thankfully, that moderation thing does not apply to things such as steak, single malt scotch, and redheads with tattoos. If it did, then what would be the point?
"like" watermelon0 -
he also worked my whole body out on day 3 as opposed to different groups on different days. i have no idea if that whole concept of muscle confusion is really key, so idk if hes doing me any good by that, but he sure does make it hurt.0
-
he also worked my whole body out on day 3 as opposed to different groups on different days. i have no idea if that whole concept of muscle confusion is really key, so idk if hes doing me any good by that, but he sure does make it hurt.
I think you might want to look for different trainers and talk to them, possibly just switch.0 -
Well, watermelon is high on the glycemic index. It's in the 70-80 range, versus something like an apple which is around 40. However, the glycemic load is still pretty reasonable because watermelon is relatively low in carbohydrates. That said, even glycemic load isn't the be-all and end-all of the blood sugar debate. Watermelon is about 90% water and very low in fiber. Meaning it's basically analogous to drinking sugar water (albeit with a good amount of vitamins A & C). I know that I could eat about 10 times as much watermelon as I could apples.
I think watermelon would make a decent post-workout food, to stimulate insulin and rehydrate yourself; outside of that context I'd pick a different fruit. To me it sounds like decent advice.
That's just my opinion; I'm not an expert by any definition.0 -
Watermelon has a lot of sugar in it, was told by my Registered Dietician. Can't eat it anymore as I'm diabetic.
But you have a medical reason behind cutting back.
If the OP doesn't have some specific medical reason to cut sugar then there is no reason they can't eat it. Also, why the sugar content itself might seem a big much (10g for a serving) the glycemic level is actually very low (only a 3)...and only 46 calories for a 150g serving....and of that 150g serving, 141g of it is water.0 -
Well, watermelon is high on the glycemic index. It's in the 70-80 range, versus something like an apple which is around 40. However, the glycemic load is still pretty reasonable because watermelon is relatively low in carbohydrates. That said, even glycemic load isn't the be-all and end-all of the blood sugar debate. Watermelon is about 90% water and very low in fiber. Meaning it's basically analogous to drinking sugar water (albeit with a good amount of vitamins A & C). I know that I could eat about 10 times as much watermelon as I could apples.
I think watermelon would make a decent post-workout food, to stimulate insulin and rehydrate yourself; outside of that context I'd pick a different fruit. To me it sounds like decent advice.
That's just my opinion; I'm not an expert by any definition.
Not true, the glycemic level is actually only 3.
http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/fruits-and-fruit-juices/2072/20 -
Watermelon is a superfruit and one of the best things you can eat! The fruit "is a heavyweight in the nutrient department. A standard serving (about 2 cups) has one-third of a day’s vitamins A and C, a nice shot of potassium, and a healthy dose of lycopene for only 85 fat-free, salt-free calories. And when they’re in season, watermelons are often locally grown, which means they may have a smaller carbon footprint than some other fruits."
I think you're safe with watermelon - tell your trainer to provide sources for the bad advice he's giving you.
http://www.nutritionaction.com/daily/what-to-eat/two-terrific-fruits/0 -
Well, watermelon is high on the glycemic index. It's in the 70-80 range, versus something like an apple which is around 40. However, the glycemic load is still pretty reasonable because watermelon is relatively low in carbohydrates. That said, even glycemic load isn't the be-all and end-all of the blood sugar debate. Watermelon is about 90% water and very low in fiber. Meaning it's basically analogous to drinking sugar water (albeit with a good amount of vitamins A & C). I know that I could eat about 10 times as much watermelon as I could apples.
I think watermelon would make a decent post-workout food, to stimulate insulin and rehydrate yourself; outside of that context I'd pick a different fruit. To me it sounds like decent advice.
That's just my opinion; I'm not an expert by any definition.
Not true, the glycemic level is actually only 3.
http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/fruits-and-fruit-juices/2072/2
Uh yea I said the glycemic load was low, it's the glycemic index which is high. And I also said why I think the glycemic load is misleading on a food like watermelon which is so high in water content and so low in fiber.
A good alternative (if you like them) would be grapefruit. It has practically the same water and sugar content as a watermelon, but it's much lower on the glycemic index (25) and has a lot more fiber & micro-nutrients.0 -
Well, watermelon is high on the glycemic index. It's in the 70-80 range, versus something like an apple which is around 40. However, the glycemic load is still pretty reasonable because watermelon is relatively low in carbohydrates. That said, even glycemic load isn't the be-all and end-all of the blood sugar debate. Watermelon is about 90% water and very low in fiber. Meaning it's basically analogous to drinking sugar water (albeit with a good amount of vitamins A & C). I know that I could eat about 10 times as much watermelon as I could apples.
I think watermelon would make a decent post-workout food, to stimulate insulin and rehydrate yourself; outside of that context I'd pick a different fruit. To me it sounds like decent advice.
That's just my opinion; I'm not an expert by any definition.
Not true, the glycemic level is actually only 3.
http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/fruits-and-fruit-juices/2072/2
Uh yea I said the glycemic load was low, it's the glycemic index which is high. And I also said why I think the glycemic load is misleading on a food like watermelon which is so high in water content and so low in fiber.
A good alternative (if you like them) would be grapefruit. It has practically the same water and sugar content as a watermelon, but it's much lower on the glycemic index (25) and has a lot more fiber & micro-nutrients.
The glycemic index only relates to how quickly the sugar in the food enters the blood stream. The glycemic load is a far more important number. The GL of the food is a better determinant of the overall impact on blood sugar levels.
Watermelon is great. It can cause a very rapid, but minimal, blood glucose increase, but it's minimal. Almost insignificant for people with no medical problems.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions