Improving my shape without dropping weight/inches

Eleonora91

Hello guys,
I've been on MFP for almost 1 year 10 months up to now and I've lost 17 kgs, starting from 83 kgs. I'm female, 22 years old, 165 cm, and now weight around 66 kgs, which puts in me in the high part of the healthy BMI range for my height, but I think I've come very far and I'm satisfied of the result. I have decided not to lose more weight since my goal was never to get thin, and possibly keeping my somewhat hourglass shape without all of the unnecessary and unhealthy fat. I am satisfied now even if I'm sure I am not at my ideal weight, it's just not bothering me that much at the moment and who knows, maybe dropping those kgs has just been the starting of a new life long process, I'm young and I can always change my mind.

Anyway, I have been mostly doing cardio during the first part of my weightloss journey: stationary bike, running, step, walking, stuff like that. I've been trying to challenge myself with strenght training and weights since last December, and even if I workout at home I'm already finding some improvements. My arms now have small prominent biceps and my legs seem much stronger. Unfortunately, some other improvements seem to be very slow and barely noticeable. Just like many other girls in this world, my worst spots are my upper thighs and butt. I'm somewhat disproportionate since I have a 31 cm difference between my waist and butt, and I really want to work hard on my lower body because of it.

Here comes the question: I don't want to lose more inches at the moment, and I wouldn't mind keeping my weight constant. Is it possible then, while eating at manteinance, to still work on improving my shape? I would like to challenge myself more and more with the strenght training, and maybe become able to sustain a short run or other strenght activities. I want to become stronger, I want to bear efforts more easily, but I know that when you start strenght training it's easy to keep your weight constant while actually losing inches.

I would just like to look better without actually changing my body weight or measurements. Do you think it's possible? How many calories does it require and are there specific exercises I have to do (or avoid) to reach this goal?

ndj1979

yes, this is possible through a program of heavy lifting using compound movements = squats, deadlifts, rows, overhead press, pull ups/chin ups….I would recommend picking up a copy of starting strength and new rules of lifting for woman and also you tube some of the moves to get the form down. Once you have the form down, build a program around compound movements where you are working out in the 8-10 rep range and maybe three to four sets of each exercise. You could go with something like:

Monday - chest/arsm
tuesday - off/cardio/abs
wens - legs
thursday - off/cardio/abs
friday - back/shoulders
saturday/sunday off/active rest/etc…

or an upper lower split..

monday - upper
tues - lower
wens - off
thurs - upper
friday - lower
sat/sun - off/acive rest/abs/cardio etc


i would also recommend setting your macro percentages to 40 protein/30 carbs/30 fats...

DancingMoosie

I'm not really sure how you would change your shape without losing inches, changing weight or measurements. That just doesn't add up in my head. With weight training, you would possibly gain or retain muscle while burning fat, which would equate to losing inches in some spots(fat loss) and even perhaps gaining in some because of muscle. Usually you would lose the inches due to fat loss, though, before actually gaining muscle mass, which would happen when you increase calories.

Are you eating maintenance calories now? Are you weighing and measuring everything you eat as well as logging food and all exercise?

ndj1979

I'm not really sure how you would change your shape without losing inches, changing weight or measurements. That just doesn't add up in my head. With weight training, you would possibly gain or retain muscle while burning fat, which would equate to losing inches in some spots(fat loss) and even perhaps gaining in some because of muscle. Usually you would lose the inches due to fat loss, though, before actually gaining muscle mass, which would happen when you increase calories.

Are you eating maintenance calories now? Are you weighing and measuring everything you eat as well as logging food and all exercise?

I was reading this as OP wanted to slowly drop body fat while recomping…but maybe I read this wrong..??

lisalsd1

Yeah, not sure how you could "improve" the way you look without losing inches or lbs. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that. If you want to change your "shape" that's going to require 1 part getting bigger/smaller while another part stays the same or gets bigger/smaller too. Wouldn't it?

All I can tell you is that since I started using weights...I am smaller (all over). I didn't lose weight, but I lost inches. I'm basically the same shape...a smaller, firmer version of the same shape.

If you are happy where you are at now...just set your calories to maintenance and keep up the cardio. You might have to adjust cals/running a bit.

lisalsd1

I'm not really sure how you would change your shape without losing inches, changing weight or measurements. That just doesn't add up in my head. With weight training, you would possibly gain or retain muscle while burning fat, which would equate to losing inches in some spots(fat loss) and even perhaps gaining in some because of muscle. Usually you would lose the inches due to fat loss, though, before actually gaining muscle mass, which would happen when you increase calories.

Are you eating maintenance calories now? Are you weighing and measuring everything you eat as well as logging food and all exercise?

I interpreted as "spot reduce," b/c she mentioned butt and thighs...and speaking as a woman, that's what we all want to "spot reduce." I'm not familiar with the metric system, so I don't know how "disproportionate" she is...

Eleonora91

I'm not really sure how you would change your shape without losing inches, changing weight or measurements. That just doesn't add up in my head. With weight training, you would possibly gain or retain muscle while burning fat, which would equate to losing inches in some spots(fat loss) and even perhaps gaining in some because of muscle. Usually you would lose the inches due to fat loss, though, before actually gaining muscle mass, which would happen when you increase calories.

Are you eating maintenance calories now? Are you weighing and measuring everything you eat as well as logging food and all exercise?

My problem is that I still look flabby, so I want to fix this. I want my body to look more toned, without actually getting smaller (which comes from losing weight/cms).
I don't know what is it that makes my body (especially my lower body) look so "bad", but I guess it's the fat %. If I could build a reasonable amount of muscle to substitute some of this fat, I would probably look better, but since muscle is more compact than fat tissue, I would somewhat end up being smaller if I didn't build some extra muscle.

I want to start eating at manteinance (1780 kcals) starting from today, measuring everything I eat just like I did during the past years.

lisalsd1

I'm not really sure how you would change your shape without losing inches, changing weight or measurements. That just doesn't add up in my head. With weight training, you would possibly gain or retain muscle while burning fat, which would equate to losing inches in some spots(fat loss) and even perhaps gaining in some because of muscle. Usually you would lose the inches due to fat loss, though, before actually gaining muscle mass, which would happen when you increase calories.

Are you eating maintenance calories now? Are you weighing and measuring everything you eat as well as logging food and all exercise?

My problem is that I still look flabby, so I want to fix this. I want my body to look more toned, without actually getting smaller (which comes from losing weight/cms).
I don't know what is it that makes my body (especially my lower body) look so "bad", but I guess it's the fat %. If I could build a reasonable amount of muscle to substitute some of this fat, I would probably look better, but since muscle is more compact than fat tissue, I would somewhat end up being smaller if I didn't build some extra muscle.

I want to start eating at manteinance (1780 kcals) starting from today, measuring everything I eat just like I did during the past years.

Ok, I get it now. Yeah...it's fat. I have the same problem. Squatting and leg work will make your legs look better, but that requires muscle and the muscle will be smaller than the fat. I am 2 jean sizes smaller than when I started last summer. I still APPEAR to have a big butt and thighs, b/c they are still bigger than my top.

jeffpettis

The only thing that is going to help you not "look flabby" as you put it, is to lose more fat. You can do a slow recomp, but for most people it is far easier to lose fat and then build muscle. While losing fat you should be trying to maintain the muscle you currently have by doing an intelligently designed weight training program. You are not going to build muscle in a deficit or even at maintenance. And you are not going to be able to change the shape of your body without losing fat or gaining muscle.

3laine75

If you don't want to lose more inches you could recomp, like others have said, using heavy weights - your scale weight would increase though - but no one else sees that

nxd10

I'm guessing that you really do want to lose inches - you just want to stay curvy and don't care if you're skinny or not. You're basically happy with your shape and want to make it look as good as it can just where you are.

I'm very curvy - was when I was big, was when I was small. Since I went into maintenance, I went from 38, 30, 41 to 38, 28, 39. I look more curvey, I've lost two inches on my waist and hips. I haven't lost a pound.

When you look 'toned' it means you have more muscle and less flabby fat. That usually translates to less bulk for women when you're talking about your abs and bottom. Thighs can go either way, depending on how you exercise. My thighs get a lot of hard, slim muscle, but I don't do the kind of exercises that would make me bulky. And I'm a woman, who have a harder time putting on that kind of bulky muscle.

Bottom line - DON'T WORRY ABOUT LOSING YOUR CURVES! Listen to what people have told you and start exercising. Muscle looks good, is what makes that flab stop being flabby, and is really healthy for you.

Eleonora91

I'm guessing that you really do want to lose inches - you just want to stay curvy and don't care if you're skinny or not. You're basically happy with your shape and want to make it look as good as it can just where you are.

I'm very curvy - was when I was big, was when I was small. Since I went into maintenance, I went from 38, 30, 41 to 38, 28, 39. I look more curvey, I've lost two inches on my waist and hips. I haven't lost a pound.

When you look 'toned' it means you have more muscle and less flabby fat. That usually translates to less bulk for women when you're talking about your abs and bottom. Thighs can go either way, depending on how you exercise. My thighs get a lot of hard, slim muscle, but I don't do the kind of exercises that would make me bulky. And I'm a woman, who have a harder time putting on that kind of bulky muscle.

Bottom line - DON'T WORRY ABOUT LOSING YOUR CURVES! Listen to what people have told you and start exercising. Muscle looks good, is what makes that flab stop being flabby, and is really healthy for you.

Thank you I feel like I am not interested in losing more inches or weight just because I think that's not the point anymore... even though during these years I have lost several kgs and inches overall, my "problem" didn't go away that's why I guess I need to focus on strenght training right now. I already can see good results on my arms, and calves, and even my tummy looks much better... I guess it just needs more time to notice the same results on my thighs and butt since that's where I hold most of my extra kgs. I think we're almost in the same position (if not exactly the same), thank you for your advice and thanks everyone else, most of you speak so much sense, just another question - some of you refer to this "recomposition" (am I right?), would this be achievable by working alone or do I need some serious help from a trainer? I've always been dieting & exercising by myself even though it took time to get here

TavistockToad

you can't really lose fat without losing inches... its unlikely that you could build enough muscle to just replace the fat... i dont see whats wrong with losing inches when its fat though?

bizco

Lifting heavy weights totally changed the appearance of my body. I didn't lose any more weight but my body became the shape I had always dreamed of. Added bonus, I was super strong. Need to move some furniture, no problem. Need to carry heavy things up 3 flights of stairs, no problem. Never underestimate the importance of strong muscles and bones, especially as you grow older.

I did this by completing the "The New Rules of Lifting for Women" program. There are other structured programs to choose from and groups here on MFP that can provide support.

My advice is to start lifting HEAVY!

Eleonora91

you can't really lose fat without losing inches... its unlikely that you could build enough muscle to just replace the fat... i dont see whats wrong with losing inches when its fat though?

Because I'm just satisfied with my body right now, even though it's not small. I don't want it to get smaller, it could be easy to do that since that's what I've been doing during the last 2 years on MFP. I just want it to look "better" which is something that hasn't happened yet even after losing several kgs and inches.

3laine75

No, you don't need a trainer - just a good programme. There are literally hundreds though, you just need to find one and stick ti it for a while to see if you like it and the results.

I've loved starting strength, wendlers and strong curves, personally.

Eleonora91

No, you don't need a trainer - just a good programme. There are literally hundreds though, you just need to find one and stick ti it for a while to see if you like it and the results.

I've loved starting strength, wendlers and strong curves, personally.

Thank you, now I've at least got an idea to start from

Lifting heavy weights totally changed the appearance of my body. I didn't lose any more weight but my body became the shape I had always dreamed of. Added bonus, I was super strong. Need to move some furniture, no problem. Need to carry heavy things up 3 flights of stairs, no problem. Never underestimate the importance of strong muscles and bones, especially as you grow older.

I did this by completing the "The New Rules of Lifting for Women" program. There are other structured programs to choose from and groups here on MFP that can provide support.

My advice is to start lifting HEAVY!

This seems even way too beautiful to actually happen to me lol... many congrats to you! I really hope I can get as strong as you :P

Galatea_Stone

Lift weights, lift weights, then lift weights. Also do some cardio because moderate cardio gives better results.

To stay the same size overall, or to put on a little size then cut it off (which gives the best results), eat at slightly over maintenance and lift heavy with progressive loading. Or eat a little more than slightly over maintenance, lift heavy weights, then cut. The bulk-cut gives the best results because it gives you the best opportunity to put on muscle. Most women don't want to take this route, particularly after working so hard to lose weight. But if you work hard, it gives the best results by far. Even a lean or clean bulk (100-200 over maintenance) gives better results.

To stay the same weight and very slowly recomp, eat the same and lift heavy weights over a period of years. But you will lose inches (most likely centimeters). This route will take you a very long time.

Or eat at a slight deficit and cut the fat off to reveal the muscle you have. You'll get smaller, but if you have a good amount of muscle already, this is a great program. It fails if you don't have enough muscle, though. You'd need to get much smaller than I think you would want to reveal the muscle if you don't have a good bit of muscle on you already.

ETA: Protein! Make sure you're getting enough. Aim for 100-120+ grams a day.

Eleonora91

Lift weights, lift weights, then lift weights. Also do some cardio because moderate cardio gives better results.

To stay the same size overall, or to put on a little size then cut it off (which gives the best results), eat at slightly over maintenance and lift heavy with progressive loading. Or eat a little more than slightly over maintenance, lift heavy weights, then cut. The bulk-cut gives the best results because it gives you the best opportunity to put on muscle. Most women don't want to take this route, particularly after working so hard to lose weight. But if you work hard, it gives the best results by far. Even a lean or clean bulk (100-200 over maintenance) gives better results.

To stay the same weight and very slowly recomp, eat the same and lift heavy weights over a period of years. But you will lose inches (most likely centimeters). This route will take you a very long time.

Or eat at a slight deficit and cut the fat off to reveal the muscle you have. You'll get smaller, but if you have a good amount of muscle already, this is a great program. It fails if you don't have enough muscle, though. You'd need to get much smaller than I think you would want to reveal the muscle if you don't have a good bit of muscle on you already.

ETA: Protein! Make sure you're getting enough. Aim for 100-120+ grams a day.

Wow... very clear and well explained. Thank you! I think I really need to work on my proteins then... are you sure about the amount? Is there any way I can calculate my suggested protein intake basing on my weight and height?

ndj1979

you can't really lose fat without losing inches... its unlikely that you could build enough muscle to just replace the fat... i dont see whats wrong with losing inches when its fat though?

Because I'm just satisfied with my body right now, even though it's not small. I don't want it to get smaller, it could be easy to do that since that's what I've been doing during the last 2 years on MFP. I just want it to look "better" which is something that hasn't happened yet even after losing several kgs and inches.

Ok, now I am confused...you are "satisfied" with your body but you have "problem areas" and you want to "tone" up ..the only way to do this is through losing body fat which will make you drop inches....you can't just magically re-arrange your body without changing anything.

That would be like me saying I want to add muscle but I do not want to eat any more...you can't have one without the other...

I am starting to sense a troll in the force...

ndj1979

Lift weights, lift weights, then lift weights. Also do some cardio because moderate cardio gives better results.

To stay the same size overall, or to put on a little size then cut it off (which gives the best results), eat at slightly over maintenance and lift heavy with progressive loading. Or eat a little more than slightly over maintenance, lift heavy weights, then cut. The bulk-cut gives the best results because it gives you the best opportunity to put on muscle. Most women don't want to take this route, particularly after working so hard to lose weight. But if you work hard, it gives the best results by far. Even a lean or clean bulk (100-200 over maintenance) gives better results.

To stay the same weight and very slowly recomp, eat the same and lift heavy weights over a period of years. But you will lose inches (most likely centimeters). This route will take you a very long time.

Or eat at a slight deficit and cut the fat off to reveal the muscle you have. You'll get smaller, but if you have a good amount of muscle already, this is a great program. It fails if you don't have enough muscle, though. You'd need to get much smaller than I think you would want to reveal the muscle if you don't have a good bit of muscle on you already.

ETA: Protein! Make sure you're getting enough. Aim for 100-120+ grams a day.

this is great advice...except OP wants no changes in her body...:)

AliceDark

Ok, now I am confused...you are "satisfied" with your body but you have "problem areas" and you want to "tone" up ..the only way to do this is through losing body fat which will make you drop inches....you can't just magically re-arrange your body without changing anything.

That would be like me saying I want to add muscle but I do not want to eat any more...you can't have one without the other...

I am starting to sense a troll in the force...

I think what she's saying is that she's overall happy with her shape and doesn't want to make any dramatic changes. Sounds like an excellent attitude, imho.

OP, like everyone else has said, lift heavy things! If you're eating at maintenence and lifting, you're not really going to lose inches (more like centimeters). You are going to look firmer and feel a lot stronger. You'll continue to basically look the same with your clothes on, but lifting makes everyone look better naked.

Sarah4fitness

What it SOUNDS like what you want is to change the areas you don't like from flabby, to firm, but keep the exact same shape you have right now, like just smooth out and firm it up.

Which, unfortunately, is impossible. If you lift heavy, and eat at maintenance, and change ONLY the lifting about your routine, you will shed fat (and size) and build muscle. Women's bodies do not build muscle at the same rate they burn fat. If you were to increase your protein intake while lifting heavy and eating slightly over maintenance, you might keep your fat stores (for the most part) and build muscle under said fat, however, that will lead to an increase in size and weight, which you may not like.

The only way to appear "toned" is to shed body fat and build muscle. This will result in a smaller size, but that doesn't have to mean you have "no curves". I found MY curves were greatly accentuated by cutting fat while building muscle, so it CAN be done, you just need to choose a more specific, non-contradictory goal.

__freckles__

Sounds like you need to looking into bulking/cutting cycles. Google is your friend!

lisalsd1

you can't really lose fat without losing inches... its unlikely that you could build enough muscle to just replace the fat... i dont see whats wrong with losing inches when its fat though?

Because I'm just satisfied with my body right now, even though it's not small. I don't want it to get smaller, it could be easy to do that since that's what I've been doing during the last 2 years on MFP. I just want it to look "better" which is something that hasn't happened yet even after losing several kgs and inches.

Ok, now I am confused...you are "satisfied" with your body but you have "problem areas" and you want to "tone" up ..the only way to do this is through losing body fat which will make you drop inches....you can't just magically re-arrange your body without changing anything.

That would be like me saying I want to add muscle but I do not want to eat any more...you can't have one without the other...

I am starting to sense a troll in the force...

I checked this thread this afternoon to see where we were at...and I'm actually more confused too.

Being "satisfied" with where you are at now is a good thing...but are you going for "satisfied?" It sounds like maybe you do want to improve your appearance, which is also fine too. If that's the case, yes to weights, yes to more protein. I changed my my macros in MFP to 35% fat/35 carbs/30 protein. Typically, I am eating over 100 grams of protein...and on some days up to 150 grams of protein.

Eleonora91

Ok, now I am confused...you are "satisfied" with your body but you have "problem areas" and you want to "tone" up ..the only way to do this is through losing body fat which will make you drop inches....you can't just magically re-arrange your body without changing anything.

That would be like me saying I want to add muscle but I do not want to eat any more...you can't have one without the other...

I am starting to sense a troll in the force...

Ahah that's funny... I'm not a troll. We just don't all have the same goals. My goal was never to be thin, or get my body fat % as low as possible.
I just wanted to know if it was possible to look any better, because I have lost weight, I have lost inches, I have lost body fat but I still look like the smaller version of the girl I was 1,5 years ago. Smaller, but still somewhat flabby, and not toned at all.
I hope this makes sense. Losing inches and losing weight has made me feel much better, I'm lighter, more active and such, but if I kept losing weight and dropping sizes and everything, I could even come to be the typical thin girl with flabby skin all over. Which is definitely not something I am willing to be.

Eleonora91

this is great advice...except OP wants no changes in her body...:)

LOL nope! I didn't say I don't want any change! I said I don't want to keep losing weight or inches!
It would be great for me to actually lose fat and build muscle, so that answer makes a lot of sense to me.
I don't want to end up getting smaller and smaller during the process, which is completely different.

Eleonora91

I checked this thread this afternoon to see where we were at...and I'm actually more confused too.

Being "satisfied" with where you are at now is a good thing...but are you going for "satisfied?" It sounds like maybe you do want to improve your appearance, which is also fine too. If that's the case, yes to weights, yes to more protein. I changed my my macros in MFP to 35% fat/35 carbs/30 protein. Typically, I am eating over 100 grams of protein...and on some days up to 150 grams of protein.

Okay, I'll try explain myself better.
I am satisfied of my weightloss process. I am satisfied of my shape (I have lost weight and inches homogeneously up to now).
My body looks smaller, and it actually is smaller, but I still look like someone who hasn't done a bit of exercise during the last 1,5 years, which unfortunately is not true. My lower body looks disproportionate and losing weight didn't help, considering that I've lost the exact same amount of inches on each of my tracked spots (bust, waist, hips and so on).
That's why I know I need a change. I could probably go on and lose weight forever to see if something happens, but seriously, why? I wouldn't mind to have these big legs if they looked healthy instead of, well, what they actually are... legs of a girl who used to be almost obese.
I hope it makes sense now
^ edit: not only my legs, obviously, since you can't spot reduce and so on, my lower body is where I still look worse, but I'm obviously working on my tummy and arms too.

Eleonora91

I think what she's saying is that she's overall happy with her shape and doesn't want to make any dramatic changes. Sounds like an excellent attitude, imho.

OP, like everyone else has said, lift heavy things! If you're eating at maintenence and lifting, you're not really going to lose inches (more like centimeters). You are going to look firmer and feel a lot stronger. You'll continue to basically look the same with your clothes on, but lifting makes everyone look better naked.

Thank you, that's exactly what I meant. I see no reason in keeping on losing weight until I get... until I get where, actually? Yes I could be thinner, I could be at my ideal weight, but this is not what I want to focus on right now, even though this is just the beginning and after losing 17 kgs I know I can do anything with my body, so if one day I'll decide to get to my ideal weight I eventually will. It's just not what would make a huge difference now.
I just wanted to ask if there's a way to still look like the "big" girl that I am, while actually having a stronger body rather than a body that's just been shrunk in time.

ndj1979

I checked this thread this afternoon to see where we were at...and I'm actually more confused too.

Being "satisfied" with where you are at now is a good thing...but are you going for "satisfied?" It sounds like maybe you do want to improve your appearance, which is also fine too. If that's the case, yes to weights, yes to more protein. I changed my my macros in MFP to 35% fat/35 carbs/30 protein. Typically, I am eating over 100 grams of protein...and on some days up to 150 grams of protein.

Okay, I'll try explain myself better.
I am satisfied of my weightloss process. I am satisfied of my shape (I have lost weight and inches homogeneously up to now).
My body looks smaller, and it actually is smaller, but I still look like someone who hasn't done a bit of exercise during the last 1,5 years, which unfortunately is not true. My lower body looks disproportionate and losing weight didn't help, considering that I've lost the exact same amount of inches on each of my tracked spots (bust, waist, hips and so on).
That's why I know I need a change. I could probably go on and lose weight forever to see if something happens, but seriously, why? I wouldn't mind to have this big legs if they looked healthy instead of, well, what they actually are... legs of a girl who used to be almost obese.
I hope it makes sense now
^ edit: not only my legs, obviously, since you can't spot reduce and so on, my lower body is where I still look worse, but I'm obviously working on my tummy and arms too.

OK - but you cannot spot reduce fat. Fat is going to come off from where it wants, when it wants...so if you all of a sudden go up to maintenance then guess what? The fat that has not left your problem areas is not going to lose your problem areas. So if you want to lose more fat you are going to have to keep eating in some kind of deficit and lifting heavy.

You can't have it both ways and say "I like where I am, but I want to change these specific parts" because it does not work this way ...

My suggestion would be keep eating in a deficit until you are happy with your "problem" areas, and then increase to maintenance and keep lifting heavy...

Eleonora91

OK - but you cannot spot reduce fat. Fat is going to come off from where it wants, when it wants...so if you all of a sudden go up to maintenance then guess what? The fat that has not left your problem areas is not going to lose your problem areas. So if you want to lose more fat you are going to have to keep eating in some kind of deficit and lifting heavy.

You can't have it both ways and say "I like where I am, but I want to change these specific parts" because it does not work this way ...

My suggestion would be keep eating in a deficit until you are happy with your "problem" areas, and then increase to maintenance and keep lifting heavy...

Well, my fat hasn't obviously completely left my problem areas, but I guess I'd need to be at a very low weight / low fat % to have a small lower body since that's part of my shape. Most girls I know do have big thighs while having small arms or waists, but this doesn't mean that they look like someone sucked part of their body weight from them.
I don't want to sport reduce, I just wanted to know if there's a way to make my body look better, my problem area might be my lower body but as I already said I'm working on my upper body too, the difference is that I'm already seeing results there while I'm not seeing them on my lower body. I am obviously going to work on my whole body as I've been already doing.

Also, I thought that you couldn't build muscle on a deficit, which is something that I've been taught from the very beginning of my weightloss journey.