How many of your exercise calories do you eat?

2»

Replies

  • Diondk
    Diondk Posts: 159 Member
    I never eat extra calories the main reason for it is because i am not feeling hungry!

    I eat 6 times a day and i am not feeling hungry so i eat my normal calories and the dog can have the activity calories ;)
  • ravenstar25
    ravenstar25 Posts: 126 Member
    I don't. MFP grossly overestimates what I burn in a day anyhow. Of course, my exercise (due to health conditions) tends to be on the lighter side, mostly walking. If you are doing extremely heavy exercise and are trying to actively build muscle you may consider doing things a little differently. It depends on what your metabolism is and what your goals are. Don't let your total intake dip too low on any given day, but then if you are going for fat loss alone don't eat the calories back. For muscle building do. That's the short and sweet version.
  • missylectro
    missylectro Posts: 448 Member
    The less of them I'd eat the greater the weight loss
  • s1rens0ng
    s1rens0ng Posts: 127 Member
    In for recommendations.

    ME TOO!
  • kitlynnJ
    kitlynnJ Posts: 78 Member
    I eat back 50-66% of my exercise calories. I use MFP's estimates, and as others have said they tend to be high.
  • lemon629
    lemon629 Posts: 501 Member
    Only if I am hungry and need to eat more. I think it's strange and probably unhealthy to make yourself eat more than you want just to hit some number, especially since calorie burn isn't necessarily always correct and calorie counts also may be off a little, even if you weigh and measure.
  • unesemainedecruaute
    unesemainedecruaute Posts: 54 Member
    I do what my body tells me to do. I do 2-A-Days and try to stick to only eating back 1 routines burn back. BUT, if I am truly hungry, I will eat more. The biggest difference for me was learning the difference between real hunger and mental hunger. Once I figured that out, my body started making the call on what i eat back.

    This.
  • QuietBloom
    QuietBloom Posts: 5,413 Member
    Don't eat less than 1200 calories in one day. If your at 1200 with eating exercise calories or not then your should be ok at least to sustain your body for that day.

    :huh: 1200 net per day is not a 'one size fits all' number.
  • mrslcoop
    mrslcoop Posts: 317 Member
    I use the TDEE (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) method and stick to a flat calorie rate every day since TDEE includes exercise calories. I'm pretty consistent with my exercise so my TDEE doesn't vary much from day to day and I end up between a 15-25% deficit with an average of TDEE -20%. I just find it easier to hit the same calorie goal every day and not worry about mucking with variable calories at the end of the day.

    This. And on days I'm super hungry, I just eat up to my TDEE or my maintenance calories (like today).
  • A_Fit_Mom
    A_Fit_Mom Posts: 602 Member
    On average..half of them back. But there are definitely days..I eat all of them back. :)
  • Jayme2787
    Jayme2787 Posts: 12
    I hardly ever eat the "extra" calories I earned by exercising for 2 reasons.

    1. I occasionally have over calorie days, so I figure it all balances out in the big picture.

    2. I've been watching my diet and exercising for years but my weight has barely budged, except to go up. So I'll take any advantage to help me lose weight I can get. I'm trying to keep my energy expended to calories consumed ratio as high as possible.

    I've lost about 5 pounds in the last month so I'll stick with this strategy until it doesn't work.

    Ditto. I lose really slowly, so as long as I'm not starving myself or feeling any negative effects, I stick with my calorie goal and don't eat any of my exercise calories. I don't even track my exercise on here anymore just to keep from confusing my extra calories with what I usually allow myself a day.
  • thatfitgeek
    thatfitgeek Posts: 54 Member
    I donate mine to less fortunate inner-city youth
  • zenhiker2014
    zenhiker2014 Posts: 84 Member
    I'm fairly new here (been on mfp for about a month) so I don't have the experience many previous posters bring to this discussion, but here's my thinking:

    In the past I've worked on the "bigger deficit = faster weight loss" assumption and while I did lose weight, it wasn't fast and it didn't teach me good habits. Since joining mfp I've tried to follow the recommended process including eating back exercise calories. I just try to leave 100-200 calories "on the table" at the end of the day to allow for logging errors. I find that if I don't eat back most of the calories, I don't feel good and am irritable, plus am more likely to impulse eat.

    I use a fitbit to get my estimated daily burn, and mapmyfitness for activities that the fitbit doesn't capture well, so I'm not relying on mfp to estimate my daily calorie use. It just does the math for me to show what I can eat and still reach my target deficit for steady weight loss.

    For me, being able to up my calorie allowance is great motivation for exercising more. I like to exercise so on weekends it's no problem, but during the week my job can can be all consuming and I need that extra motivation to carve out some time for fitness.

    Bottom line, I'm losing weight faster by following this strategy than I ever did before, I feel good, and I almost never feel hungry. Of course YMMV.
  • shanaber
    shanaber Posts: 6,423 Member
    I think when you are first starting out it is important to eat back at least some of the exercise deficit (like many have said MFP overstates the amount). It is motivating and initially you may not know your body signals for when you truly need more, I know I sure didn't. Now I listen to my body and know when I need to eat more and I can definitely tell when I am on a run or working out that I haven't eaten enough.
  • November_Fire
    November_Fire Posts: 165 Member
    I don't know how much I burn, so I just use it as a buffer to my 1500 guideline for the day. I eat around 1500, if I go over no sweat, I am 'eating back' the exercise I did. It's also a buffer for logging errors or weight estimates - I'm not weighing every apple, and then its remaining core, or every teaspoon of nutmeg, or that single Haribo sweet someone offered me. If I'm hungry, I eat. No denial here. I assume I needed it, and if I were to go consistently over the 1500 each day I figure I'm in a place where I need to set a new guideline.
  • levitateme
    levitateme Posts: 999 Member
    I think it's a very individual thing and depends a lot on what activity you are doing and how accurately you are able to estimate your calorie burn. On WW, I used to eat all of my activity points back with no trouble whatsoever. I have found on MFP that I can sometimes have trouble losing if I eat all of my exercise calories. My suggestion would be to start at eating 75% of them back. If you aren't losing at the rate you should be, cut back to 50%. If you are losing too fast, go on up to 100%. Just be willing to play with the numbers and give your body a few weeks to adjust in between changes so you can see the full effect.

    Also, the consensus seems to by the MFP is pretty accurate on calorie burn for walking, but most other things it does over estimate. And that exercise machines also typically over esimtate a little. Just something to keep in mind.

    This. If you are mostly certain that your calorie burn is accurate eat them all. If you're relying on MFP's or machine's estimates, eat just a portion. I use a hrm and shapesense's hr based calculator to estimate my burns and feel confident eating most of them back.
  • Any PT's i've asked have said it's not a good idea to eat them back - unless you're working out to an extreme (like all day bootcamps). Even Jessica Smith says not to on her website. Some people use it as an excuse to eat bad foods because they've exercised enough.. but that's not the point. It's especially ridiculous with people who log everyday things like sex and housework and then eat those calories back. Aslong as you don't feel really hungry, then you shouldn't eat the calories back for the sake of it.