Fruitarians

Miansun

Are there fruitarians here? What vitamins do you take and did you lose weight?
I wanna be a fruitarian because I love fruits than veggies...

cwsreddy

:noway:

andreyadonna

Being a fruitarian requires a lot of careful balance. It's difficult to get all the proper nutrients that you need just off of fruit unless you live in an area where the local ecosystem naturally has a wide variety of fruit. You should discuss with a Doctor before making a decision as exclusive as being a fruitarian.

Miansun

Thank you!:)

Qarol

umm, Fruitarians eat vegetables too

kjo9692

Maybe I'm wrong BUT I believe being fruitarian involves only eating the fruits when they fall off the plant? This is extremely challenging and difficult to accomplish, and pretty extreme. Just eat whatever you want at a calorie deficit and that will help you lose weight. When you get good at this start tracking your macros (carbs, proteins, fats).

Escloflowne

I.C.E. Cream Official Tester
IKEA Professional Put Together-er
Kickboxing Class Attender
Been in fitness for about 2 years and have studied kitty-gif-ology, nutrition and Dinosaurs

licorice_tea

I'm going to pretend you are a member of the Jain religion because otherwise I think this is a terrible idea.

Let's assume that, for deeply held religious and personal convictions, you need to switch to eating only fruit. Okay, in that case you should probably first start with going vegetarian. Then vegan. Then raw vegan. Then fruititarian. At each stage, as you get more restrictive, you will be able to tell the changes in your body and health as a relation to the foods you are cutting out. If you take a hit going to vegetarian, it's probably iron and B12. If you take a hit going vegan, it's probably protein and essential amino acids. If you take a hit going raw vegan or fruititarian, it is probably vitamins and not enough fats/protein which you can't really fix because that's the gist of the diet.

cwolfman13

And how exactly are you going to go about getting your requisite fats and protein? Those are kind of essential and stuff to proper nutrition.

To make this even remotely healthy you're going to have to have a pretty vast knowledge of nutrition in order to meet all of your requirements, and you're likely to require a good deal of supplementation...seems stupid to me to have a diet that requires a bunch of supplements to actually be "healthy"...really though, this is pretty dangerous and there are a number of individuals who have gotten very sick and hospitalized doing this (including some Hollywood celebs)...because, you know...they don't know **** about proper nutrition and end up not getting proper nutrition...which pretty much leads to malnutrition.

4homer

and this is why we have the Darwin awards

TheGymGypsy

In for possible Paleo vs Fruitarian throw down.

lemur_lady

You say you love fruits more than veggies. I assume you like other stuff too (bread,meat,cheese etc)?

Why not just eat the foods you DO like, include lots of (but don't restrict to) fruits and this way manage to get a relatively healthy mix?

neandermagnon

Being a fruitarian isn't healthy. It's IMPOSSIBLE to get all the proper nutrients that you need just off of fruit EVEN IF you live in an area where the local ecosystem naturally has a wide variety of fruit. because humans are primates and primates need other foods besides fruit to get enough amino acids

^^^^^^ fixed it for you

If you don't believe me, ask a primatologist. If a zookeeper fed monkeys or apes a fruit only diet, he or she would get done for animal neglect and cruelty. Additionally, there's a brain-for-body size correlation with diet in primates. As in the larger the brain, the more animal protein the primate eats, with humans having the largest brains for their body size and eating the most animal protein, followed by chimpanzees, which eat small mammals as well as insects, and have the next largest brain-for-body size. additionally, insect eating primates (i.e. those who get their aminos from insects) have bigger brains (compared to body size) than leaf eating primates. (btw humans don't have the digestive apparatus to get amino acids from leaves, so that won't supplement a fruitarian diet)

I'm the first to criticise anyone who tries to say fruit is bad for humans, because most primates eat fruit for vitamins, minerals, carbohydrate and fibre. But primates need to eat either animal protein (usually insects) or leaves to get amino acids and fat, and humans can't get them from leaves. And humans need more fats than other primates because of our large brains. A vegan diet is possible only with an advanced enough level of agriculture to grow plant foods containing enough fat and protein in large enough quantities for humans to get protein from them alone, and even then supplementation with vitamin B12 is necessary. But a fruitarian diet eliminates even those few plant foods that are high enough in protein to sustain a human if eaten in sufficient quantities, because none of these plant foods are fruits.

vegan diet = just about possible with careful balancing, access to modern technology and vitamin B12 supplements

fruitarian diet = dangerous

neandermagnon

You say you love fruits more than veggies. I assume you like other stuff too (bread,meat,cheese etc)?

Why not just eat the foods you DO like, include lots of (but don't restrict to) fruits and this way manage to get a relatively healthy mix?

because it's far too logical and easy, that's why....

OP you're a primate, yes eat as much fruit as you want, but please eat some other foods as well to get enough fat and amino acids. take your pick: eggs, dairy, meat, fish, beans, tofu, lentils, insects (if you really really want to, chimps love them and our palaeolithic ancestors would have eaten them and even some modern hunter-gatherers still eat them).... but you can't get enough fat or amino acids from fruit only!

PaleoPath4Lyfe

I sure hope you are supplementing or you are going to be malnourished in some areas and it will eventually make you very sick.

I am speaking from personal experience.

You are not giving your body balanced nutrition in no shape, form or fashion.

GillianMcK

I'm going to pretend you are a member of the Jain religion because otherwise I think this is a terrible idea.

Let's assume that, for deeply held religious and personal convictions, you need to switch to eating only fruit. Okay, in that case you should probably first start with going vegetarian. Then vegan. Then raw vegan. Then fruititarian. At each stage, as you get more restrictive, you will be able to tell the changes in your body and health as a relation to the foods you are cutting out. If you take a hit going to vegetarian, it's probably iron and B12. If you take a hit going vegan, it's probably protein and essential amino acids. If you take a hit going raw vegan or fruititarian, it is probably vitamins and not enough fats/protein which you can't really fix because that's the gist of the diet.

There's no chance of me going fruitarian (although I understood it to be fruit that falls (or would fall from the plant) so in effect fruit that can be harvested without killing/harming the plant/tree.
Would the fats/proteins not comes from nuts and seeds which are relatively high in these things??

I have memories of a program that looked at going entirely vegetarian without the use of tofu etc that get substituted now a days and the amount of fruit that had to be eaten raw was unbelievable and the people that took part in it, their digestive system just couldn't cope with it (squirty bottoms all round after day 2), Vit b12 was a big issue as it is not available in any fruit and some of the essential fatty acids again are not found in fruit (both are however found in animal meat), I know that majority of nutritions say that children and teens should not use it and adults should not be on it for any period of time!!

Personally not for me, would take far too much time researching and balancing, I'll stick with what we have evolved into:)

wibutterflymagic

From the movie Nottinghill:

William: And, ah, what exactly is a fruitarian?
Keziah: We believe that fruits and vegetables have feelings, so we think cooking is cruel. We only eat things that've actually fallen off a tree or bush- that are, in fact, dead already.
William: Right, right. Interesting stuff. So, these carrots...?
Keziah: Have been murdered, yes.
William: Murdered? Poor carrots. How beastly!

---

MinimalistShoeAddict

I am no expert on the diet but here is a great video showing how a Fruitarian gets to work each day:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tQA3Tvkg_s

neandermagnon

I would advise against fruitarianism for any large brained primate. For smaller brained primates that have the necessary digestive system adaptations to extract a sufficient amount of amino acids from leaves, fruit and leaf "arian" diet would be adequate. For large brained primates that lack such adaptations, an additional source of amino acids and essential fatty acids is necessary in the diet, such as insects or small mammals.

You are a large brained primate and you don't have the ability to get enough amino acids from leaves. You can't survive on a fruitarian diet. Because primate biology.

Of course if you're not a large brained primate...

neandermagnon

just saw that this is a zombie thread and I already said the same things before lol

brokentide

Look up Denise Minger and her criticism of the fruitarian diet (and the dental damage that she caused to herself as a fruitarian when she was younger)

_Zardoz_

vegan diet = just about possible with careful balancing, access to modern technology and vitamin B12 supplements

fruitarian diet = dangerous

The bolded bit you can say that about modern diets full stop .Even modern omnivorous diets are only possible due to modern technology, factory farming and many other things. Implying this is just because it's a vegan diet is pretty misleading. As for careful balancing as with any diet a variety of foods is the way to go. You do not have to do some magical balancing act to eat a healthy Vegan diet just use some common sense. You could argue your careful balancing act for omnivorous diets also and considering the amount of people that eat animal products and don't get sufficient or proper nutrition maybe they should do some 'careful balancing'.

I never claim that nutritionally vegan diets are 'better' than others as you can have bad vegan diets the same way you can have good ones containing animal products. I am a vegan due to the ethical implications. However I do think people sometimes try to over complicate and scaremonger about how hard it is to get your nutrition on a Vegan diet. I've been a Vegan for 15 years and a Vegetarian before that I have never struggled with my nutrition (other than getting fat due to eating too much) I have never had to spend time doing this 'balancing act'.

Although there are no ancient cultures recorded that were Vegan there are many recorded that were successful Vegetarian cultures with minimal animal products. Sorry to de rail the thread but I wanted to address this continual Myth that Vegan diets are some modern complicated balancing act

And Yes I agree eating only fruit is silly

GatorDeb1

Wait.... there IS such a thing as a Fruitarian?

CupcakeCrusoe

From Wikipedia:

Actor Ashton Kutcher went on a fruitarian diet to prepare for his role as Apple CEO and onetime fruitarian Steve Jobs in the film Jobs; the actor subsequently suffered from pancreatic problems which he attributed to the diet and was taken to a hospital. Jobs died of pancreatic cancer.[33]


I think you'll find this is a bad idea if you do your due diligence (and don't listen to the silly girls on Pinterest) (I have a Pinterest, I am not a silly girl). If you're really serious about this, see a nutritionist and keep an open mind for what he/she says. Your health comes first.

Chaotic_Weevil

I'm a fruititarian.

Steak is a fruit.

MSeel1984

I mean no really...do you think that is what being a fruitarian is?

Meerataila

I've been doing well with 5:2 combined with most of my feed days having only one big meal. But I'm thinking of switching to Raw til 4 (or in my case probably 6-8 pm). Why? Because even though IF has gotten me pretty far, as my weight drops and my exercise increases these past couple of weeks I've been having many restless fast nights and too much hunger and some cravings on the following day, and instead of giving me energy like it was before, this past fast day was horrible. I felt wretched and still felt pretty awful yesterday.

Raw til 4 would let me eat something light with carbs to fuel my workouts like fruit or a fruit smoothie and then I can have greens, nuts, seeds, beans, and potatoes in a larger meal at night, tailoring it to something much like another form of IF.

neandermagnon

vegan diet = just about possible with careful balancing, access to modern technology and vitamin B12 supplements

fruitarian diet = dangerous

The bolded bit you can say that about modern diets full stop .Even modern omnivorous diets are only possible due to modern technology, factory farming and many other things. Implying this is just because it's a vegan diet is pretty misleading. As for careful balancing as with any diet a variety of foods is the way to go. You do not have to do some magical balancing act to eat a healthy Vegan diet just use some common sense. You could argue your careful balancing act for omnivorous diets also and considering the amount of people that eat animal products and don't get sufficient or proper nutrition maybe they should do some 'careful balancing'.

Point is that a hunter-gatherer diet is an omnivorous diet, and all humans and were omnivorous until some cultures had developed a high enough level of agricultural knowledge and technology to get enough protein without animal products.

i.e. the natural diet of humans is an omnivorous diet and a herbivorous/vegan diet for humans has only been possible recently because of very recent advances. Without those advances in technology, an ominvorous diet was necessary.

You don't need modern technology to be an omnivore, you can be an omnivore with stone age technology. Just because people choose to use advanced technology nowadays doesn't mean that an omnivorous diet needs technology and careful balancing (which the vegan diet does require, because you can't be a vegan with only palaeolithic technology)

Also, chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans are omnivorous too, so you don't even need stone age technology to be an omnivore. It's not just the natural diet of humans, it's the natural diet of all of the family hominidae. And of large brained primates in general. And they, nor our palaeolithic ancestors, need(ed) to know what a balanced diet was. So clearly you don't need to know how to carefully balance diets to be an omnivore as our palaeolithic ancestors and our hominidae cousins in the wild ate/eat an omnivorous diet without any knowledge of what a "balanced diet" means. Modern people have just got too good at obtaining and maintaining a steady food supply to the point that we;ve got fat. But one of the plus sides of that for people who don't want to eat animal products is that we now have the technology that with careful balancing, you can get enough protein from plants, which our hunter-gatherer ancestors and wild great apes can't/couldn't do.

I never claim that nutritionally vegan diets are 'better' than others as you can have bad vegan diets the same way you can have good ones containing animal products. I am a vegan due to the ethical implications. However I do think people sometimes try to over complicate and scaremonger about how hard it is to get your nutrition on a Vegan diet. I've been a Vegan for 15 years and a Vegetarian before that I have never struggled with my nutrition (other than getting fat due to eating too much) I have never had to spend time doing this 'balancing act'.

I was vegan for a long time, and yes it does take work and balancing and supplementation of nutrients you can't get from plants. Also, some deficiencies, like vitamin B12 may take months or years to develop, so someone could be eating a nutritionally unbalanced diet and feel fine on it for a long time. From personal experience, it is a lot easier to get adequate nutrition on an omnivorous diet and I feel a lot healthier on an omnivorous diet than I ever did on a vegan diet. And as I said, hunter-gatherers manage to get a balanced diet without even knowing what it is... because their diet is the natural diet of humans that our ancestors ate for millions of years.

Most of the issues with lack of balance that affect modern, western omnivores is due to the easy availability of foods that have excessive fat, carbohydrate (especially simple sugars) and salt - this is not a problem inherent to the omnivorous diet as hunter-gatherers don't have these problems.

Also, I wasn't saying what I said to scare people away from vegan diets - I have respect for people who are vegan for ethical reasons. I was making the point that it is possible for humans to be vegan with access to high protein plant foods and supplements, but it's not possible to be fruitarian at all. And yes I do think it's an important message that you have to put effort into getting a balanced diet if you're going to give up animal products, because if you don't, then there is a risk of nutritional deficiency. I used to be vegan, I know. Maybe it comes easy to you and that's great, but it doesn't come easy to everyone.

Although there are no ancient cultures recorded that were Vegan there are many recorded that were successful Vegetarian cultures with minimal animal products. Sorry to de rail the thread but I wanted to address this continual Myth that Vegan diets are some modern complicated balancing act

The earliest vegetarian societies had agriculture and lived in areas of the world where plants high in protein could grow easily. This was not possible in most parts of the world and in evolutionary terms, they are advanced cultures with advanced technologies, i.e. a long way from stone age. Additionally, my comment was about the vegan diet, not the vegetarian diet. With eggs and dairy products it's not hard to get enough protein as a vegetarian. I never mentioned vegetarians. Due to the lack of dairy products and the scarcity of eggs it's not possible to be a vegetarian hunter-gatherer, but once you have domesticated animals and can get a plentiful supply of milk and eggs it's pretty straight forward... the vegan diet requires the ability to cultivate certain plants that are high in protein, such as pulses, which means the right climate or the ability to build things like greenhouses that can be used to imitate the right climate for those kinds of plants, plus labs to make non-animal forms of vitamins like B12. So it's clear that veganism requires a significantly higher level of technology than vegetarianism does, and that even vegetarianism was impossible prior to the domestication of animals, and prior to that, only an omnivorous diet was possible, i.e. the hunter-gatherer diet.

nykismile

Fruitarian is just a really bad idea. I'm a vegan and while I love fruit more than anything (it's my absolute favorite food), my body couldn't live on it alone. Trust me, I have tried.

Besides, fruitarians eat a lot of vegetables too, so your reason for wanting to be a fruitarian is not only silly but also irrelevant.

If you go vegan (or if you already are) make sure you get enough protein in your diet. I'm still a little low on protein in my macros (I don't even hit 20%) because I'm always eating fruit as my meals. It's just what I prefer to do but it's not that healthy to live this way all the time.

Also, don't listen to Freelee. She's just some uneducated girl who uses her body to try to market an unrealistic diet. She's not even following 80/10/10 anymore, yet she's writing a book on it. Sigh. Don't listen to hot girls with revealing tops, just look at research and studies and let them provide you with answers.