I have never seen Star Wars
Replies
-
There are 2 groups of Nerds and Geeks ....Sci-Fi and Fantasy.
And Star Wars is the happy marriage of both! :drinker:
+10 -
Nor have I....and it drives my husband bonkers.0
-
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.0 -
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
He's awesome, and he did an incredible job with the LOTR movies.0 -
You're not missing much.
Totally agree... and I'm actually a sci-fi fan.
me too this .. i was a star trek fan..... havent seen them , dont plan on it, spaceballs was good though
0 -
So you've never seen it, but you can agree that people who haven't aren't missing much? You base that on ...?You're not missing much.
Totally agree... and I'm actually a sci-fi fan.
me too this .. i was a star trek fan..... havent seen them , dont plan on it, spaceballs was good though0 -
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
I reread the book after watching "Return of the King." I love them both the same as I ever did. I love them each for what they are. Movies are movies. Books are books. Ne'er the twain shall meet...0 -
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
He's awesome, and he did an incredible job with the LOTR movies.
Yep, yep!
You *have* to alter the story to turn any book into a film. Otherwise, NO ONE will sit through it. It would be incredibly boring. (I don't even listen to "books on tape" or whatever they call it in the 21st century.) When I read a book, I'm reading a book. If I'm watching a movie, they need to show me, not narrate.0 -
You're not missing much.
Totally agree... and I'm actually a sci-fi fan.
me too this .. i was a star trek fan..... havent seen them , dont plan on it, spaceballs was good though
Spaceballs was funny, but you missed a lot of the jokes if you never saw "Star Wars."0 -
Star what?
0 -
Don't worry folks, This Sunday is "Star Wars" day.
You can watch all six of them.0 -
Don't worry folks, This Sunday is "Star Wars" day.
You can watch all six of them.
I have them all on DVD, same as LOTR and Harry Potter, so I can do a marathon anytime I want. We have marathons like that from time to time at our house. We love our sci fi and fantasy stuff!0 -
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
I reread the book after watching "Return of the King." I love them both the same as I ever did. I love them each for what they are. Movies are movies. Books are books. Ne'er the twain shall meet...
Exactly. You can never relay ALL of the richness of the book into the movie, especially Tolkien. And your own imagination when reading the book can be very different from the set designs, special effects of the movie, etc.0 -
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
I reread the book after watching "Return of the King." I love them both the same as I ever did. I love them each for what they are. Movies are movies. Books are books. Ne'er the twain shall meet...
And the movie (the only one I will ever watch in the series unless forced otherwise) sucked. It sucked before I read the book, so it wasn't a comparison. But someone said people who had read the books seemed to like the movies better. I disliked the movie just as much before and after reading the book.
He did a horrible job with The Lovely Bones, too. People who hadn't read the book hated that movie equally with people who had. It was awful. Peter Jackson is awful.
If I ever publish a book and someone wants to turn it into a movie, I will not allow Peter Jackson anywhere near it.0 -
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
He's awesome, and he did an incredible job with the LOTR movies.
Yep, yep!
You *have* to alter the story to turn any book into a film. Otherwise, NO ONE will sit through it. It would be incredibly boring. (I don't even listen to "books on tape" or whatever they call it in the 21st century.) When I read a book, I'm reading a book. If I'm watching a movie, they need to show me, not narrate.
Please re-read what I wrote. I watched the movie before ever reading a single word of the books and hated it. I wasn't comparing anything. I was simply watching a movie. And it wasn't good.
(I like a little storyline with my special effects, but I guess some people don't care about plot or anything.)0 -
I'm not gonna lie, I think I've seen the series 1 time over when I was probably 10 and I don't remember it all that much. Personally, I'm more of a trekkie, give me star trek any day.0
-
Capt. Kirk always sounded like a robot - so, still not sure.
Kirk is like the coolest dude in TV history!
^^This0 -
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
He's awesome, and he did an incredible job with the LOTR movies.
Yep, yep!
You *have* to alter the story to turn any book into a film. Otherwise, NO ONE will sit through it. It would be incredibly boring. (I don't even listen to "books on tape" or whatever they call it in the 21st century.) When I read a book, I'm reading a book. If I'm watching a movie, they need to show me, not narrate.
Please re-read what I wrote. I watched the movie before ever reading a single word of the books and hated it. I wasn't comparing anything. I was simply watching a movie. And it wasn't good.
(I like a little storyline with my special effects, but I guess some people don't care about plot or anything.)
The storyline was relatively close to the book. Honestly, I'm at a loss for how you couldn't like the movies.0 -
nope me either0
-
This is my favorite episode of Star Wars:
0 -
A lot of people don't like those movies. The books had a storyline. The movie (and let's be clear: I have only seen the one) had a shadow of a plot, but it never got fully realized.It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
He's awesome, and he did an incredible job with the LOTR movies.
Yep, yep!
You *have* to alter the story to turn any book into a film. Otherwise, NO ONE will sit through it. It would be incredibly boring. (I don't even listen to "books on tape" or whatever they call it in the 21st century.) When I read a book, I'm reading a book. If I'm watching a movie, they need to show me, not narrate.
Please re-read what I wrote. I watched the movie before ever reading a single word of the books and hated it. I wasn't comparing anything. I was simply watching a movie. And it wasn't good.
(I like a little storyline with my special effects, but I guess some people don't care about plot or anything.)
The storyline was relatively close to the book. Honestly, I'm at a loss for how you couldn't like the movies.
I think you saw a plot in the movie because you already read the books and knew what was supposed to be going on. If you watched it before reading the book, you'd be pretty lost.0 -
It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
He's awesome, and he did an incredible job with the LOTR movies.
Yep, yep!
You *have* to alter the story to turn any book into a film. Otherwise, NO ONE will sit through it. It would be incredibly boring. (I don't even listen to "books on tape" or whatever they call it in the 21st century.) When I read a book, I'm reading a book. If I'm watching a movie, they need to show me, not narrate.
Please re-read what I wrote. I watched the movie before ever reading a single word of the books and hated it. I wasn't comparing anything. I was simply watching a movie. And it wasn't good.
(I like a little storyline with my special effects, but I guess some people don't care about plot or anything.)
Just wow. You missed the storyline? How is that possible? My husband didn't read the book either, but he got the storyline. The hobbit Frodo had to take the Ring of Power to Mordor to destroy it. lol
Why Frodo? Because the ring has magical powers that other beings succomb to and become enslaved by
Why Mordor? Because the fires of Mordor are the only way to destroy the ring. 0 -
A lot of people don't like those movies. The books had a storyline. The movie (and let's be clear: I have only seen the one) had a shadow of a plot, but it never got fully realized.It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
He's awesome, and he did an incredible job with the LOTR movies.
Yep, yep!
You *have* to alter the story to turn any book into a film. Otherwise, NO ONE will sit through it. It would be incredibly boring. (I don't even listen to "books on tape" or whatever they call it in the 21st century.) When I read a book, I'm reading a book. If I'm watching a movie, they need to show me, not narrate.
Please re-read what I wrote. I watched the movie before ever reading a single word of the books and hated it. I wasn't comparing anything. I was simply watching a movie. And it wasn't good.
(I like a little storyline with my special effects, but I guess some people don't care about plot or anything.)
The storyline was relatively close to the book. Honestly, I'm at a loss for how you couldn't like the movies.
I think you saw a plot in the movie because you already read the books and knew what was supposed to be going on. If you watched it before reading the book, you'd be pretty lost.
Oh, well if you only watched "Return of the King", then you missed a heck of a lot of story line.0 -
A lot of people don't like those movies. The books had a storyline. The movie (and let's be clear: I have only seen the one) had a shadow of a plot, but it never got fully realized.It's hard to enjoy lord of the rings unless you've read the books and are familiar with the story. The movies do not do a good job filling you in on who everyone is and why everything is happening. It's one of those if you watch twice you'll like better the second time because you'll understand it better. They were way ahead of their time cinematically and special effect wise though, just like Star Wars was back in the day.
I rewatched after reading the books. It wasn't better.
Peter Jackson sucks. Period.
He's awesome, and he did an incredible job with the LOTR movies.
Yep, yep!
You *have* to alter the story to turn any book into a film. Otherwise, NO ONE will sit through it. It would be incredibly boring. (I don't even listen to "books on tape" or whatever they call it in the 21st century.) When I read a book, I'm reading a book. If I'm watching a movie, they need to show me, not narrate.
Please re-read what I wrote. I watched the movie before ever reading a single word of the books and hated it. I wasn't comparing anything. I was simply watching a movie. And it wasn't good.
(I like a little storyline with my special effects, but I guess some people don't care about plot or anything.)
The storyline was relatively close to the book. Honestly, I'm at a loss for how you couldn't like the movies.
I think you saw a plot in the movie because you already read the books and knew what was supposed to be going on. If you watched it before reading the book, you'd be pretty lost.
Actually I got more lost in the book than in the movies. The book was confusing at some points. There were several passages I had to reread to understand it fully.0 -
The movie (and let's be clear: I have only seen the one) had a shadow of a plot, but it never got fully realized.
Because it was only the first 1/3 of the story.0 -
star trek > star wars
hey now...
edited for sizing
I love this!! I did love star wars, but sometimes my undying love for Picard just takes over :blushing:0 -
Star Wars (Death star)
Star Trek (Enterprise)
Babylon 5 (Starfury)
Stargate Atlantis (Pegasus system stargate) - Stargate SG1 was better
Doctor Who (Sonic screwdriver)
Farscape ("S" from the title graphic)
Firefly (the good ship Serenity)
Star Wars Episode 4, 5 and 6 are the ones to watch, and will be around for a long long time, some of best good vs evil storytelling in film form around.
Stargate SG1 was brilliant with Richard Dean Anderson and Amanda Tapping (shame it fell apart when Richard left).
Firefly was great, even for only one season, Jewel Staite was Hot in those overalls (and her appearance in SG Atlantis was ok as well).
Doctor Who, great entertainment.
Star Trek - mine was the Picard era, and is my preferred Captain of the franchise, plus Q was rather funny.
BUT top of the pile has to be Babylon 5.
.
That knowledge though..
0 -
Just read a great blog on how a Star Wars noob should watch the series. A lot of people will either choose the Episode Order (I, II, III, IV, V, VI) or the Release Order (IV, V, VI, I, II, III). This guy makes a great argument for dropping Episode I altogether (which I'm totally for, because f*** Jar-Jar) and watching the remaining 5 episodes in the Machete Order (IV, V, II, III, VI). When my son is ready to learn the ways of the force, we're totally choosing the Machete Order.
http://static.nomachetejuggling.com/machete_order.html0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions