We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Who is good at math? HELPPP!!!

Sarie_Bronish
Sarie_Bronish Posts: 255 Member
edited February 21 in Health and Weight Loss
My friend weighs 187 pounds and is 38% body fat currently.

I know that 38% of 187 pounds = 71 pounds.
This would leave 116 pounds as LBM

She wants to know what she would weigh at 33% body fat. - but I apparently skipped class those days in math class because I cant figure this out after 3 sheets of paper, 100+ equations, and more answers than I care to admit. Help me please!!!

Replies

  • Sarie_Bronish
    Sarie_Bronish Posts: 255 Member
    cool points if you show your work :P
  • j6o4
    j6o4 Posts: 871 Member
    She wants to lose 5%, 38% - 33% = 5%
    187lbs x 0.05 = 9.35lb, this is how much she needs to lose.
    187lbs - 9.35lbs = 177.65lbs, this is how much she would be at 33% if she loses no muscle in the process.
  • Aaron_K123
    Aaron_K123 Posts: 7,122 Member
    If her lean mass is 116 pounds and she is at 33% bodyfat and you want to determine her weight X then:

    116 + 0.33 * X = X


    Solve for X. 57 pounds of fat, 173 pounds would be her bodyweight assuming no loss of lean mass.
  • EvanKeel
    EvanKeel Posts: 1,903 Member
    are you assuming she only lost fat? If so, it should be fairly easy to figure out a 5% reduction in weight..unless I'm missing something.
  • Aaron_K123
    Aaron_K123 Posts: 7,122 Member
    She wants to lose 5%, 38% - 33% = 5%
    187lbs x 0.05 = 9.35lb, this is how much she needs to lose.
    187lbs - 9.35lbs = 177.65lbs, this is how much she would be at 33% if she loses no muscle in the process.

    But if she is 177.65 pounds at 33% bodyfat her lean mass would be 177.65 - (.33 * 177.6) = 119 which would mean she would have put on 3 pounds of lean mass.

    Answer is 173
  • EvanKeel
    EvanKeel Posts: 1,903 Member
    She wants to lose 5%, 38% - 33% = 5%
    187lbs x 0.05 = 9.35lb, this is how much she needs to lose.
    187lbs - 9.35lbs = 177.65lbs, this is how much she would be at 33% if she loses no muscle in the process.

    But if she is 177.65 pounds at 33% bodyfat her lean mass would be 177.65 - (.33 * 177.6) = 119 which would mean she would have put on 3 pounds of lean mass.

    Fair

    EDIT: I guess alternatively one could say X= (116/0.67) if assume 116 is constant.
  • j6o4
    j6o4 Posts: 871 Member
    She wants to lose 5%, 38% - 33% = 5%
    187lbs x 0.05 = 9.35lb, this is how much she needs to lose.
    187lbs - 9.35lbs = 177.65lbs, this is how much she would be at 33% if she loses no muscle in the process.

    But if she is 177.65 pounds at 33% bodyfat her lean mass would be 177.65 - (.33 * 177.6) = 119 which would mean she would have put on 3 pounds of lean mass.

    Answer is 173

    hmm, guess i made a mistake.
  • brisingr86
    brisingr86 Posts: 1,794 Member
    If her lean mass is 116 pounds and she is at 33% bodyfat and you want to determine her weight X then:

    116 + 0.33 * X = X


    Solve for X. 57 pounds of fat, 173 pounds would be her bodyweight assuming no loss of lean mass.

    I did the math differently, but came up with the same answer.
    1. Assuming LBM should remain constant: lean body mass=weight * (1-%BF).
    2. 187*(1-0.38)=X* (1-0.33)-->solve for X
    3. 187*0.62=0.67X
    4. 115.94/0.67=X
    5. 173.04=X=weight at 33% body fat
  • yewbic
    yewbic Posts: 37
    x - 116 = x(.33)
    x - .33x = 116
    .67x = 116
    x = 173
  • Sarie_Bronish
    Sarie_Bronish Posts: 255 Member
    thank you - yes, I WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY over thought this, and i shouldve stuck to my gut. I got all twisted up and *kitten* deep in numbers that didnt matter while trying to be accurate.
  • Aaron_K123
    Aaron_K123 Posts: 7,122 Member

    EDIT: I guess alternatively one could say X= (116/0.67) if assume 116 is constant.

    Yeah that would be the easy way really then you don't even have to solve for X in the formula I layed out. Of course if you do do the algebra you end up with X = (116/.67) as laid out in what yewbic did. Guess I never showed my work ;-)
This discussion has been closed.