Eating out is basically impossible
Replies
-
Well since I've been married (15 years) my wife and I eat out at least 2 times a week. It's not impossible, just don't freak out if a day isn't perfect.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness industry for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition0 -
Nope I eat out all the time.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
It is possible. Hitting those macros is really hard to do everyday whether you eat out or in. I have even eaten at McDonalds on occasion and stayed well within my caloric allowance. However, you are female and probably have a much lower tolerance of caloric intake than I do so it may be harder for you.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
As I've been averse to eating out lately, I decided to take a "1200 calorie challenge". While consuming 1200 (net) calories or less, I took my girlfriend to a movie theater and ate popcorn, then we hit a bar and had drinks and an appetizer, then we hit a restaurant where I indulged in baby back ribs and two sides. I hit target, wasn't hungry, and the scale's down. With 2000 calories it would've been even easier!
I also kept my sodium reasonable and hit most of my micronutrients. I will admit my macros were not on-target.. there was an ordering error, and I should've sent a wrong dish back instead of eating it.
PS - The trick? 700 calories of exercise. Which meant, I cleaned my house in the morning, and we took a leisurely walk around a nice are of town to get to both the places. Also, I used portion control.0 -
I have even eaten at McDonalds on occasion and stayed well within my caloric allowance.
On a 2000-calorie diet, blowing 750mg of that sodium allowance on your first 250 calories (Egg McMuffin) is doable but not particularly convenient. It makes the rest of the day challenging.0 -
This isn't really something I've found. We eat out several times a week, at different restaurants, and I can always find something I like. I may ask for something like dressing on the side, or double veg instead of fries or something, but that's all doable.
I don't know about fast food, but real, sit down restaurants aren't an issue for me. They just take a little creative thinking.0 -
I feel the same way about eating out, and have just chosen not to. I feel like I can have a tastier and more satisfying meal at home. I detest the fake taste of grilled chicken in restaurants. I'm not at a point with my weight loss that I want to blow a day of calories on eating out. I eat 5-6 smaller meals a day, so I'm also hungry every 2-3 hours, and if I miss/skip a meal to be able to eat out, I would more than likely over eat b/c of that. You know yourself and your goals better than anyone else. I do agree with the poster who said to halve the meal. I was just looking through on-line menus, and since they do give so much food, you could easily halve it I think.
*edited to say I don't deprive myself of treats, but again, I can get more bang for my buck so to speak by making it myself
you are going to the wrong restaurants..seriously…
ETA - the reason I go out, most of the time, is to get a better meal then I can prepare …..
maybe you need some cooking lessons! I'm sure I have a lower caloric goal for the day than a male, and most of my meals are between 200-300 cal. You just can't get that at a restaurant. Plus, the sodium is crazy! I ate one salad from Chik-fil-A last week and gained a pound (and I did make good choices for dressing). Like I said, I'm not far enough into my weight loss for that to be worth it. yet... I'm happy with what I'm able to get at home and don't really miss it. Now, when vacation time hits, I'll have to make some sacrifices!
I grew up in an italian household, I make my own marinara, alfredo, etc from scratch, so I know how to cook.
Chik-fil-a, applebees, etc is not "eating out"…I am talking about going somewhere where they cook good, real food, like a local spot that has fresh fish, sushi place, steakhouse, etc…..
That isn't available everywhere; especially if you don't live in a metro area, and even where one can get fresh food, it can still be cooked in a very high caloric manner. If it fits in your daily goal, good for you, but again, most women don't have as high of a daily goal as most men. I'm not saying I won't learn how to fit it in to daily life once I'm at my maintenance, but I am not missing anything by making my own food.
Female not in maintenance and I can make it work, you keep going back to well it's a male so you can do it. Females can eat out just as easily it just takes planning. And waiting until you are in maintenance to learn how to incorporate going out, or eating things is a recipe for disaster. Learn moderation now and it will help to set you up for maintenance
I'm not waiting for maintenance to learn moderation. I'm not "dieting" and am not depriving myself of anything. I've said it repeatedly; it depends on one's personal goals. Eating out is not necessary or inevitable and there are people who don't depend on it. I can have a treat without eat a 700 calorie meal in one setting. It seems to me more people take offense when someone chooses not to "cheat" in the same manner. The OP asked if any one else found it difficult and I empathized with her. Doesn't make either of us wrong.
How is having one of your meals 700 calories a cheat? 500-700 cals is often dinner (my main meal as it seems to work out). (not eating out, just normal).
That would be a huge cheat for me and my daily goals. Everyone seems to think one size fits all here.
Again. Not seeing how it is a cheat if you are still meeting your calorie goals. Just because one meal is bigger than others makes it a cheat?
AGAIN, for MY goals and the way I am choosing to eat, it doesn't fit. STILL doesn't make it wrong if it's working for me.
Glad it wasn't just me. I understand that you "prefer" smaller portioned meals but unless you are going over your calorie goal, I just can't wrap my head around the idea you'd tell yourself your cheating.
But as you said, each your own. I just think doing that is really restrictive and just would be a reason to make myself feel bad if I didn't stick to something perfectly...even if the end result was good.
Then I guess it's a good thing it doesn't matter if it makes sense to you or not. I'm not counting on either of you or your opinions. I can relate to the OP; I eat smaller meals and find it difficult to eat at a restaurant. Not the end of the world.0 -
i personally look at the facts too. i find it hard at a fast food place but have found a few things. wendys chili is a good one to eat. you always have subway but not everything. i stay away from burgers unless turkey and even then try to stay away. olive garden soup is great 100 calories per bowl. ( minestrone ) jack in the box tacos if you just eat 2 arent that bad. waffle house chicken melt and there waffles if you leave off all the syrup. mcdonalds yogurt. your right though it is hard. when going to places like cracker barrel i do grilled chicken with cabbage, seasonal veggies, fruit,0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions