Irregardless of what you came to MFP for...

_John_
_John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
Topics other than health and fitness will be discussed in the CHIT CHAT area of these boards. These will range from insignificant, flat out stupid, to drama queening inappropriateness.

Deal-with-it-chuck-norris-gif.gif
«1

Replies

  • jacques57
    jacques57 Posts: 2,129 Member
    How about the grammar Nazis? Like "Irregardless" is not a word.
  • wolfsbayne
    wolfsbayne Posts: 3,116 Member
    Irregardless is not a word :tongue:

    60ddf6e9f000b4f186a1a7783f2d60eb.jpg
  • kinkyslinky16
    kinkyslinky16 Posts: 1,469 Member
    Ugh irregardless bothers me SO much! :grumble:

    I am not a grammar nazi usually but there are a few things that drive me crazy.. and irregardless is one.. ugh its like nails on a chalkboard for me for some reason.
  • Lauren8239
    Lauren8239 Posts: 1,039 Member
    Ugh irregardless bothers me SO much! :grumble:


    Me too. I hate made up words...especially that one! :huh:
  • Cliffslosinit
    Cliffslosinit Posts: 5,044 Member
    24muaz6.gif
    Now deal with it!!
    21v62c.gif
  • dym123
    dym123 Posts: 1,670 Member
    I’m guessing criticism of your grammar is not what you were expecting when you started this thread. :ohwell:
  • TheVirgoddess
    TheVirgoddess Posts: 4,535 Member
    Irreregardless not being a word is not a grammar issue.

    I think Liam Neeson > Chuck Norris.
  • capnrus789
    capnrus789 Posts: 2,736 Member
    I came for bad grammer and non-words.
  • Tla0126
    Tla0126 Posts: 207 Member
    I... I can't.
  • wolfsbayne
    wolfsbayne Posts: 3,116 Member
    Irreregardless not being a word is not a grammar issue.

    I think Liam Neeson > Chuck Norris.

    Sherlock-GTFO.gif
  • TheVirgoddess
    TheVirgoddess Posts: 4,535 Member

    I think Liam Neeson > Chuck Norris.

    Sherlock-GTFO.gif

    Benedict > Chuck?
  • TheVirgoddess
    TheVirgoddess Posts: 4,535 Member
    Actually irregardless is a word - it's just non-standard, according to Merriam Webster. Interesting. I thought it was a double negative.
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member
    There, you have all been enlightened. Class dismissed.


    MOAR GIFS!!!!!
  • kinkyslinky16
    kinkyslinky16 Posts: 1,469 Member
    24muaz6.gif
    Now deal with it!!
    21v62c.gif
    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
  • rachelrb85
    rachelrb85 Posts: 579 Member
    tumblr_m8vfrsfGM71qkmpj8o1_500.gif
  • wolfsbayne
    wolfsbayne Posts: 3,116 Member

    I think Liam Neeson > Chuck Norris.

    Sherlock-GTFO.gif

    Benedict > Chuck?

    19777217.jpg
  • Velum_cado
    Velum_cado Posts: 1,608 Member
    You misunderestimate MFP.
  • AliceSwarthout
    AliceSwarthout Posts: 808 Member
    Ugh irregardless bothers me SO much! :grumble:


    Me too. I hate made up words...especially that one! :huh:
    Pretty sure the OP is trolling with that one, guys...
  • KrazyDaizy
    KrazyDaizy Posts: 815 Member
    I came for bad grammer and non-words.
    Irregardless of how this is wrong we should all conversate about it now.
  • Deena_Bean
    Deena_Bean Posts: 906 Member
    You misunderestimate MFP.

    :laugh:
  • Kitten2629
    Kitten2629 Posts: 1,358 Member
    lmaooo and the only thing picked up on was the spelling of a word.
  • bcoop911
    bcoop911 Posts: 1,390 Member
    Irregardless is not a word :tongue:

    60ddf6e9f000b4f186a1a7783f2d60eb.jpg

    Yes it is... just not a COMMONLY used word. It is in the dictionary...

    "Irregardless" originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless

    Just because your spell check puts a squiggly line under it, does not mean it is not actually a word. I can't stand the word either, but it is STILL a real word.
  • lazydanthaman
    lazydanthaman Posts: 182 Member
    91pHd.gif
  • Cliffslosinit
    Cliffslosinit Posts: 5,044 Member
    27wul1z.gif
  • TX_Rhon
    TX_Rhon Posts: 1,549 Member
    h9317057B
  • TheVirgoddess
    TheVirgoddess Posts: 4,535 Member

    I think Liam Neeson > Chuck Norris.

    Sherlock-GTFO.gif

    Benedict > Chuck?

    19777217.jpg

    chuck_zps6099e3d3.jpg
  • wolfsbayne
    wolfsbayne Posts: 3,116 Member
    Irregardless is not a word :tongue:

    60ddf6e9f000b4f186a1a7783f2d60eb.jpg

    Yes it is... just not a COMMONLY used word. It is in the dictionary...

    "Irregardless" originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose.

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless

    Just because your spell check puts a squiggly line under it, does not mean it is not actually a word. I can't stand the word either, but it is STILL a real word.

    I'll accept that it's an erroneous word.
  • kinkyslinky16
    kinkyslinky16 Posts: 1,469 Member
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRTEcMoxl41V36wVu5yWm8Uz-GBazaN-21thSHcLLEgywnJwLNk
  • softncudly
    softncudly Posts: 722 Member
    "powerrangers.gif"
  • Cliffslosinit
    Cliffslosinit Posts: 5,044 Member
    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRTEcMoxl41V36wVu5yWm8Uz-GBazaN-21thSHcLLEgywnJwLNk

    23vm9o8.gif