The office debate
Muddy_Yogi
Posts: 1,459 Member
in Chit-Chat
Ok it is really just me and my co-worker and I think I know the answer but since he is debating with me...I wanted to ask the forums and he promised to go with the result we are given. LOL
He says that if you survive mainly on a diet of soda.....2000 calories a day (Lets say this is below your maintenance just for this debate) You will lose weight because it is a liquid.
I said if you ate 2000 calories of Peanut butter every day and nothing else you will lose as long as it is under your maintenance calories as well.
He disagreed. Is there a difference between 2000 calories of PB and 2000 calories of Mountain Dew (only in regards to weight loss not health benefit...)
He says that if you survive mainly on a diet of soda.....2000 calories a day (Lets say this is below your maintenance just for this debate) You will lose weight because it is a liquid.
I said if you ate 2000 calories of Peanut butter every day and nothing else you will lose as long as it is under your maintenance calories as well.
He disagreed. Is there a difference between 2000 calories of PB and 2000 calories of Mountain Dew (only in regards to weight loss not health benefit...)
0
Replies
-
This debate does ignore the joy factor, as in I'd love 2000 calories of PB right now but the thought of drinking 2000 calories worth of Mt. Dew or any soft drink in THAT amount......just...I mean...I think I'm gonna throw up....0
-
Calories in vs calories out. You are correct, your coworker is incorrect. If you are in a calorie deficit, your body will lose mass. And as such, you will lose weight.0
-
My diet soda has 0 calories.
It doesn't matter if you are getting your calories from a liquid or not. Calories are calories.0 -
I also drink diet soda, but I can tell the question is regarding regular soda.
Basically, the question is: If one consumes at a deficit, can one gain weight with some types of food/drink and lose weight with other types of food/drink?
Answer: I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that a deficit is a deficit regardless of where it comes from... thus if 2,000 calories is a deficit, then that person will lose weight drinking soda, or will lose weight eating PB... doesn't matter, s/he will lose weight.
*As instructed, I'm ignoring the macronutrient and micronutrient issue and don't actually expect anyone to eat like this.
Edited to be more clear.0 -
I'm on the Mountain Dew and peanut butter diet. I haven't lost any weight, but I poop a lot.0
-
Mt Dew has caffeine and gives you diarrhea = greater weight loss in the short term0
-
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.0 -
diet soda has zero calories so how would he be getting 2000 calories exactly?
Calories are calories no matter the source0 -
In for the peanut butter diet.0
-
diet soda has zero calories so how would he be getting 2000 calories exactly?
Calories are calories no matter the source
diet OF soda, not diet soda.
I had to read that again too.0 -
The person only drinking the Mountain Dew will die from malnutrition. The person only eating peanut butter will die from dehydration.
Lose / lose.0 -
I'm on the Mountain Dew and peanut butter diet. I haven't lost any weight, but I poop a lot.
Sign me up. Is it a beachbody thing ?0 -
This content has been removed.
-
I'm on the Mountain Dew and peanut butter diet. I haven't lost any weight, but I poop a lot.
Sign me up. Is it a beachbody thing ?0 -
diet soda has zero calories so how would he be getting 2000 calories exactly?
Calories are calories no matter the source
edit: Binky beat me to it.0 -
This debate does ignore the joy factor, as in I'd love 2000 calories of PB right now but the thought of drinking 2000 calories worth of Mt. Dew or any soft drink in THAT amount......just...I mean...I think I'm gonna throw up....
This!0 -
The bacon and bourbon diet worked for me
Mt. Dew and peanut butter must be for minors.0 -
The person only drinking the Mountain Dew will die from malnutrition. The person only eating peanut butter will die from dehydration.
Lose / lose.
LOL well yes, and no one said they couldn't have water. So possibly the pb person is the winner for at least a little while!0 -
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.0 -
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.
I agree...I'm curious as well!0 -
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.0 -
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.
I agree...I'm curious as well!
If the mountain dew is cold it will cause the persons body to burn more calories warming it self...0 -
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.
I agree...I'm curious as well!
If the mountain dew is cold it will cause the persons body to burn more calories warming it self...0 -
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.
I agree...I'm curious as well!
If the mountain dew is cold it will cause the persons body to burn more calories warming it self...
Clearly we need a celery diet to round this out.0 -
OH, MAN!!!! NOW I WANT SOME PEANUT BUTTER!!!!0
-
Peanut butter offers more nutrients. Sure, you'd lose on both, but you'd look just awful living on the carbonated drink as compared to peanut butter.0
-
I peanut butter.0
-
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.
I agree...I'm curious as well!
If the mountain dew is cold it will cause the persons body to burn more calories warming it self...
So about this theory... let's talk about ice cream.0 -
You would probably lose more with the peanut butter as your body requires more energy (will burn more calories) digesting that then it would a liquid that is already in a very simple format (sugar).
So in this case if 2000 cals put you in a deficit of say 250 cals/day with the pop (meaning your maintenance would be 2250), then the peanut butter would put you in a deficit of closer to 300 cals/day as the increase energy from digestion may increase maintenance to 2300.
So if you ate about 2050 of peanut butter you would lose the same as 2000 of pop, as both would give you a deficit of 250 cals below maintenance. It is the deficit that matters, not necessarily a fixed input, and macros and format of food, will affect the total cals burned for the day.
I would go further and say because it is liquid it takes less energy to break it down and be absorbed much easier and faster than a solid or semi solid.
I agree...I'm curious as well!
I would assume the digestion of 2000 cals of peanut butter would be much more than 50 cals, whereas the soda would burn very little. since the soda is liquid and has 0 protein I would venture to guess a greater than 50 cal difference. the below is an escert showing about a 41cal/day if protein is increased :
"...although substituting carbohydrate for fat in the diet does not appear to alter total energy expenditure, increasing protein intake to 30–35% of energy does increase energy expenditure. The increase, however, is only ≈70 kcal/d"
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/79/5/899S.full
that said the peanut butter would not be that high in protein, but the soda diet would be lower than the base amount so I would say 50 cals in dif would probably be pretty close.0 -
You and your co-worker need to find some work to do... :drinker:
I'd vote for the peanut butter diet. Your body will try to survive on the sugar, but it will find that it cannot.
Your body needs certain essential amino acids (proteins) and certain essential fatty acids (fats) -- only some of which your body can create out of carbs. Without proteins and fats, your body will lack linolenic and linoleic acid (Omega-3 and Omega-6). Amino acids humans cannot synthesize are phenylalanine, valine, threonine, tryptophan, methionine, leucine, isoleucine, lysine, and histidine. You must get these from your food and drink. At a glance: Peanuts have them, Mtn. Dew does not.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions