Calorie Discrepancies Between Devices
wallelf1
Posts: 36 Member
I did an experiment this morning when I took my walk. I wore my Fitbit, and had MapMyWalk. I also wore a Mio Sport HRM. The walk I take is 2.8 miles with a 61 foot gain; there are two killer hills on this trek, so it’s a pretty good workout for me. I accomplished the round trip in 01:01:25.
Fitbit gave me 258 calories burned
MapMyWalk gave me 364
and the Mio gave me 785 ~laughs hysterically~
I put a new battery in the Mio yesterday and entered the gender/weight, etc. I had hoped to use it to track calories on the rebounder (instead of using the Fitbit), but now I think I’m going to have to figure out a different way to log the rebounder time. Any suggestions?
Fitbit gave me 258 calories burned
MapMyWalk gave me 364
and the Mio gave me 785 ~laughs hysterically~
I put a new battery in the Mio yesterday and entered the gender/weight, etc. I had hoped to use it to track calories on the rebounder (instead of using the Fitbit), but now I think I’m going to have to figure out a different way to log the rebounder time. Any suggestions?
0
Replies
-
Body sensor results are the new vanity sizing.
I compared walks using MapMyFitness and RunKeeper and found that RunKeeper was more conservative with the calories. But, I think that unless you are testing calorie burn under lab conditions, we're always going to be subject to someone's estimator.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions