HRM for 24 hours

hpsnickers1
Posts: 2,783 Member
I have never done this before but figured since my HRM seems to be a good one I would try it. I wore it for about 24 hours. My HR signal messed up last night so I missed about 5 minutes. And I paused it and took a shower this morning - too scared of killing the HRM. The time total came to 23 hours so I just counted 60 calories burned in an hour since the average calories burned just resting for me is one calorie per minute. (Actually 1.03).
When I figured my resting calories they came to 1483 and MFP has my BMR set at 1480. The numbers are just estimates so I figure MFP is right on with the BMR
To figure resting calories (this only applies to Heart Rate Monitors and ones that don't take into account calories that would've been burned anyway- don't know if any of them are like that):
Take your BMR and divide by number of minutes in a day (1440) (mine comes to 1.03)
Take the number of minutes doing the activity (60 minutes) and multiply that by your number result (60*1.03= 61.08 or 61 calories). Subtract that number from the number of calories burned doing the activity (300-61 = 239 actual activity burn).
So I did this with the total day. I burned a total of 2327 calories in 1440 minutes.
1440 * 1.03 = 1483.2 (see? close - calories I would've burned anyway).
2327 - 1483 = 844 (I burned a total of 844 doing things other than just resting). And yesterday was a lazy day. I didn't exercise. I didn't have to cook dinner. I didn't walk a lot during the day.
This might seem a little anal but I can be a bit anal. I have a tendency to try and be as exact as I can when numbers are involved. This issue has been sheer hell for me trying to count calories and nutrients. But it was an interesting experiment.
When I figured my resting calories they came to 1483 and MFP has my BMR set at 1480. The numbers are just estimates so I figure MFP is right on with the BMR
To figure resting calories (this only applies to Heart Rate Monitors and ones that don't take into account calories that would've been burned anyway- don't know if any of them are like that):
Take your BMR and divide by number of minutes in a day (1440) (mine comes to 1.03)
Take the number of minutes doing the activity (60 minutes) and multiply that by your number result (60*1.03= 61.08 or 61 calories). Subtract that number from the number of calories burned doing the activity (300-61 = 239 actual activity burn).
So I did this with the total day. I burned a total of 2327 calories in 1440 minutes.
1440 * 1.03 = 1483.2 (see? close - calories I would've burned anyway).
2327 - 1483 = 844 (I burned a total of 844 doing things other than just resting). And yesterday was a lazy day. I didn't exercise. I didn't have to cook dinner. I didn't walk a lot during the day.
This might seem a little anal but I can be a bit anal. I have a tendency to try and be as exact as I can when numbers are involved. This issue has been sheer hell for me trying to count calories and nutrients. But it was an interesting experiment.
0
Replies
-
bump to read later.
thanks hpsnickers10 -
Welcome. And I'm sure there will be people saying HRM's are for logging exercise only and all of that. That is what I normally do with it. But what is our day but a bunch of ongoing activities? I did it out of curiosity.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 397K Introduce Yourself
- 44.2K Getting Started
- 260.9K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.6K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 456 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.5K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3.1K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions