Is to much protein a bad thing?

2»

Replies

  • YeaILift
    YeaILift Posts: 580 Member
    Eisenstein, Julie, Roberts, Dallal, Saltzman. "High-protein Weight-loss Diets: Are They Safe and Do They Work? A Review of the Experimental and Epidemiologic Data." Nutrition Reviews, Jul 2002, Vol 60 Issue 7, 189-200.

    author's abstract
    From the available data, however, it is evident that the consumption of protein greater than two to three times the U.S. Recommended Daily Allowance contributes to urinary calcium loss and may, in the long term, predispose to bone loss. Caution with these diets is recommended in those individuals who may be predisposed to nephrolithiasis or kidney disease, and particularly in those with diabetes mellitus.
    Increase Dietary Calcium and Water.

    "High Protein Diets Risky for Bones and Kidneys." Good Medicine, Winter 2003, Vol 12 Issue 1.

    Presents an overview of the result of a study on the effect of low-carbohydrate high-protein diets on acid-base balance, stone-forming property and calcium metabolism of bones and kidneys conducted by S. T. Reddy et. al., which was published in the 'American Journal of Kidney Diseases' in 2002.
    Increase Dietary Calcium and Water.

    "Yet Another Health Organization Criticizes High-Protein Diets." Tufts University Health and Nutrition Letter. Dec 2001 Vol 19 Issue 10.

    Evaluates the effects of high-protein diets in the U.S. Influence in the progression of kidney diseases; Ability to clog up arteries; Loss of calcium in the urine.
    Increase Dietary Calcium and Water.

    "TOO MUCH PROTEIN MAY CAUSE REDUCED KIDNEY FUNCTION." New Vegetarian & Natural Health. Winter 2003, p11.

    Reports on the findings of a research regarding a link between high-protein diets and kidney function decline. Risk factor on the source and type of protein; Inquiry on the long-term health outcomes.
    Increase Dietary Calcium and Water.






    Researches found that an increase in protein causes an increase in the "glomerular filtration rate" back in 1983. Since then, scientists and researches have jumped to the conclusion that an increase in our GFR puts more stress on the kidneys. However, there is no scientific evidence backing this claim.

    In fact, in this review from the Internation Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN), athletes took up to 1.27g/lb of protein. This was the concluison:
    In any case, without evidence, one must wonder from where the dissuasive "education" stems. Various researchers have observed the disconnectedness between scientific evidence and public education regarding protein. The lack of population-specific data on athletes and the equivocal nature of existing data on non-athletes (e.g. elderly and even chronic kidney disease patients, beyond the scope of this review) bring into question why there is a "widely held belief that increased protein intake results in calcium wasting"[6] or why "Media releases often conclude that "too much protein stresses the kidney" [4]. Conversely, any conclusions that purposeful consumption of ample or surplus dietary protein are harmless or entirely without consequence are similarly under-substantiated, at least regarding the resistance trainer population. Note that the recent ISSN position paper quoted earlier in this review simply concludes that concerns are "unfounded" for healthy exercisers, not that a harmless situation exists. This is correctly cautious. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence (regarding available data on protein's renal, bone or dietary consequences). As a population that routinely consumes higher amounts of protein,[7] strength athletes appear to be dismissing warning messages from educators but may instead be relying on questionable personal or anecdotal "evidence" once that educator credibility is lost. It would be truer to promulgate a message that the scientific and professional communities still lack specific information on the total safety profile of ample, purposefully sought protein among weightlifters. After decades of controversy we still simply do not explicitly know.
    http://www.jissn.com/content/6/1/3
  • pkpzp228
    pkpzp228 Posts: 146 Member
    holy crap. it's not like she's going to eat 500 grams of protein a day. she could easily double her protein intake and she would be fine. it's not like they're telling her to eat as much protein as she wants based on a 5000 calorie diet.

    Seriously, put it in perspective. I'm sure we can all dig up links to journals and flex our research muscle under the guise of providing information that helpful to the OP.

    It was already said MFP generally under proportions protein intake goals, and OP was talking about an overshot of like 20 grams or something. Adding another 400 kcal expendature will up your protein goal for the day by more than that and we're working in the context of a calorie deficit....

    Long story short its negligible.
This discussion has been closed.