People with Heart Rate Monitors

bwyne03

So I have been thinking about purchasing a heart rate monitor so that I can see exactly how many calories I am burning when I workout. For the people who currently have hrm's, have you found that the estimated calories burned for any given exercise listed on mfp are fairly accurate to what your hrm shows??

Thanks :happy:

talysshade

Nope, for me they were quite off! I'm so glad i got my HRM. it was 30 bucks, but so much more accurate. MFP database almost always overestimated for me.

BECav0602

Mine have been fairly accurate. However, it definitely depends on how hard you push yourself. Days that I am really tired I can burn a lot less than what MFP says. I love my HRM. It is motivation for me. If I don't feel I am burning enough it pushes me to work harder.

BTW-I have a Polar FT4. Get one with a chest strap to be accurate.

amymeenieminymo

No, when I enter the time, MFP populates the calorie field and it's always way off from what I'm about to enter from my HRM, usually by 100 calories or more. Sometimes MFP says I burned more, sometimes it says I burned less.

picturesing

Have had mine for 2 wks - LOVE it. Polar FT4 - $89, but I got mine for $69. Much more accurate!!!!

Dunrick

The polar monitor is amazing and I suggest it as a must to help you keep track of what you are burning.

1horsetown

I have a Garmin FR60. MFP is about a third higher than my actual burn.

I researched a bit and found that some HRMs will tell you your heart rate so you can stay in your 'target zone', but don't use your heart rate to figure your calorie burn. That seemed kinda pointless.

Anyway, very happy with my Garmin.

1horsetown

Mawskittykat

I bought a New Balance N4 from target. I will say that it is the best thing I ever purchased. I use it every day and absolutely love it. I am burning way more calories than what MFP says that I am burning. and I love the fact that I know exactly what I am burning not just an idea based on someone else. We are each different and burn at different rates. I LOVE IT

bwyne03

Wow thanks everyone for the feedback!! I thought maybe mfp estimated a little high, which is a bummer (lol) I'm definitely going to check into getting one now! Next question, are they easy to figure out? I'm not very savy when it comes to electronics :ohwell:

bwyne03

I bought a New Balance N4 from target. I will say that it is the best thing I ever purchased. I use it every day and absolutely love it. I am burning way more calories than what MFP says that I am burning. and I love the fact that I know exactly what I am burning not just an idea based on someone else. We are each different and burn at different rates. I LOVE IT

good to hear!! Maybe this is what is going with me too (hopefully) haha

solpwr

The MFP database is set up on the assumption of an average fitness level for your weight and age, and average exertion levels of the various listed activities.
A decent HRM that reads out calories is very dependent on age, weight, and fitness level that you enter into the device to calculate exertion levels based upon your bpm.
If you HRM doesn't ask for age, weight, and fitness level, or it isn't entered correctly, it cannot accurately record calories expended. If it is set up correctly, a better quality HRM is a much better calculator of calories expended; its using your real HR to calculate based upon assumptions used for your age and fitness.
The more fit you are, the less calories you will burn for a given activity at a given exertion level, and the more efficient your body is at producing power and work at a given energy consumption.

As a rule of thumb, if your HRM is under-reporting compared to MFP data, you aren't working as hard as what would be considered average for the activity for a person similar to you. If it is over-reporting, the opposite is true.

To give an example, right now I'm riding my road bike quite a bit (165 miles in the last 15 days). My average speed is 17-18 MPH, but the MFP database more aligns with the exertion level for "bike, vigorous 14-16 MPH" (my bike is aerodynamic and I'm wearing a Kit). Depending on just how hard I go out, I have to goal seek the number of minutes to match what my HRM says I expended, because my HRM is more accurate. Generally I have to adjust the minutes downward because I'm not working as hard as the average person like me. But if I go out really hard, pushing an average speed 18+ MPH for an hour for instance, I may have to adjust the minutes upward. I still like using the database because it tells me a relative number to compare my personal effort to.

My goal by the way is to match my personal best in a time trial of 22.5 MPH for an hour. Hopefully in August I'll be in the 20's. Need to lose more weight to get there. Blubber is the enemy.

bwyne03

The MFP database is set up on the assumption of an average fitness level for your weight and age, and average exertion levels of the various listed activities.
A decent HRM that reads out calories is very dependent on age, weight, and fitness level that you enter into the device to calculate exertion levels based upon your bpm.
If you HRM doesn't ask for age, weight, and fitness level, or it isn't entered correctly, it cannot accurately record calories expended. If it is set up correctly, a better quality HRM is a much better calculator of calories expended; its using your real HR to calculate based upon assumptions used for your age and fitness.
The more fit you are, the less calories you will burn for a given activity at a given exertion level, and the more efficient your body is at producing power and work at a given energy consumption.

As a rule of thumb, if your HRM is under-reporting compared to MFP data, you aren't working as hard as what would be considered average for the activity for a person similar to you. If it is over-reporting, the opposite is true.

To give an example, right now I'm riding my road bike quite a bit (165 miles in the last 15 days). My average speed is 17-18 MPH, but the MFP database more aligns with the exertion level for "bike, vigorous 14-16 MPH" (my bike is aerodynamic and I'm wearing a Kit). Depending on just how hard I go out, I have to goal seek the number of minutes to match what my HRM says I expended, because my HRM is more accurate. Generally I have to adjust the minutes downward because I'm not working as hard as the average person like me. But if I go out really hard, pushing an average speed 18+ MPH for an hour for instance, I may have to adjust the minutes upward. I still like using the database because it tells me a relative number to compare my personal effort to.

My goal by the way is to match my personal best in a time trial of 22.5 MPH for an hour. Hopefully in August I'll be in the 20's. Need to lose more weight to get there. Blubber is the enemy.

Thank you!! Very helpful information And best of luck to you in meeting your goal!!!

AngelsKisses75

For me I can say they were way off.

Yoga was way higher that my HRM reads, and everything else was way lower. Not to metion the various levels put in to each activity.

It also varied from my treadmill data, but that is expected considering my treadmill data is not personalized and is not from constant contact.

I love my New Balance N4, and actually got a pretty good deal on it at Target.

Nichole1981

I love my HRM!! I got a Suunto Watch...below is the link:
http://www.suunto.com/en-US/Products/Training-Hr-Monitors/suunto-t1c/suunto-t1c-black-pattern/

It has a chest strap and it counts my calories burned. I don't think I could have lost the 30lbs I have with out this HRM. When I am really tired and I am working out I look down at my watch and see low calories and it pushes me to work harder to get a higher number.

My girlfriend got a SportLine watch and has had nothing but problems with it. It does not count her calories correctly and she has a lot of issues with resetting the watch.

I would go with a watch that has a chest strap and get one that you know people have had success with.

lbkrillin

My HRM is like a watch with a chest strap and a sensor that buttons onto the chest strap. Once you set up the watch part (which is like setting any other watch for the most part) you wet the strap, slap it around your chest and button the sensor to it. Then you press a button to start 'recording' and off you go.

happychix

for me, MFP can be anywhere from 100 - 300 calories over, I've even seen it double what my HRM says.

Losershawn

Not even close....I have a polar FT4. Love it....it helps motivate me to keep going when I am working out!

bwyne03

Thanks again everyone!! I know what I will be doing tonight... looking for a heart rate monitor Sounds like they are easy to figure out and definitely worth the money!!!

44isthenew29

I bought a Polar FT4 last night and I love love love it! I wanted to make sure I was working hard enough and staying within my target heart rate zone - and I am.
I also find it incredibly motivating - I want to push even harder tonight to see if I can improve my numbers!

raelynnjordan

I have a Polar FT60 and I LOVE it! It has so many awesome features. I got it brand new off of eBay for $185 and free shipping. They are usually $200 or more anywhere else! AND its purple- my favorite color!

bwyne03

I bought a Polar FT4 last night and I love love love it! I wanted to make sure I was working hard enough and staying within my target heart rate zone - and I am.
I also find it incredibly motivating - I want to push even harder tonight to see if I can improve my numbers!

I can definitely see where it would push you to work harder if the numbers are right in front of you!! Thanks so much

bwyne03

I have a Polar FT60 and I LOVE it! It has so many awesome features. I got it brand new off of eBay for $185 and free shipping. They are usually $200 or more anywhere else! AND its purple- my favorite color!

Wow!! Awesome bargain and in your favorite color, can't beat that I'll have to check ebay out for sure!!

ActiveFaith10

polar ft4 all the way!

heatherfrancis

way off. My Garmin FR60 is amazing!

humblemonkey

DONT GET A MIO. Im sending mine back tomorrow--- it is a piece of cheap garbage!! Go with a polar like everyone says!!!

ladybug1620

Sometimes, but honestly it depends on the intensity you put into it. MFP doesn't account for that. I had one workout that if I had logged using MFP, I would have been too low by 300 calories or so. I burned more than 700, and MFP only wanted to give me 400-ish. So glad I got the HRM.

thisisabbie

I have a Polar F11 and love it! :-)

ShortTom

I'm considering the Wahoo Ant+ sensor, Garmin HRM strap and an iphone app...anybody else using their iphone to monitor heartrate?

med79

I love my HRM. It motivates me to keep going and push harder b/c it shows how many calories I've burned as the time passes while I'm working out. The calories that it shows that I burn is definitely much less than what mfp says I burn. Kind of depressing but I like knowing what I'm actually burning...
BTW I have a Polar FT4 and so far I have no complaints or annoyances with it.