Body fat scales

kell_riley

i just wondered if anyone had them and how accurate they are? I have no idea what my body fat percentage is and they don't often do it at my gym so thought about buying some but don't want to
Waste my money if home ones are pants lol

robertf57

If you follow all the directions they are fairly accurate. More importantly, if you do the measurements the same way, they are consitent. It will be directional correct (show you you are changing) but the absolute number it gives you can be off by quite a bit. I like mine and measuring first thing in the morning without eating drinking execising, etc it is very close to the caliper method. Mine has the hand and foot electrodes. (they work by measuring tiny electical currents. Some devices use only foot electrodes and other devices don't have a scale but are just held in your hands. Mine has both hand and feet electrodes which is touted as improving accuracy). The weight scale is excellent. Digital read out with 0.1 lbs increments. It wasn't much more than a regular scale.

Quaters

i just wondered if anyone had them and how accurate they are? I have no idea what my body fat percentage is and they don't often do it at my gym so thought about buying some but don't want to
Waste my money if home ones are pants lol

Quaters

Hello yes i have them as well, i have found them very accurate ,i weigh the same in my doctors clinic.i like to weigh myself each morning to keep me on the straight and narrow.

caat1rules

I have the hand held one. I use it the same way described above. I find it very consistant.

Tankplanker

I've the Withings Internet scales that record everything on a web site, much easier. Every once in a while the scales throw out a funny reading for my percentage fat but if I stand off and then on again they seem to work fine. Not as accurate for those digital pincer things but more than enough to show the trend.

xraychick77

they are a tool like any other. they are accruate enough to give you a ball park, but will not give you exact true results..the only really 'accurate' method is the water immersion one and/or a DEXA scan.

even the caliper method is flawed. the bioelectric one is probably the worse one. i use one at the gym and my bodyfat from month to month can go up or down 1 whole percent. but like i said it gives you a ball park.

TrainingWithTonya

I just replied to a similar question with a primer on body fat analysis methods, so I will copy and paste it here for you. I'm also adding some formulas for the measurement way of determining body fat so you can try it if you want before you buy another method. Some people just do it to save money. Regardless of which method you use, the key is consistency. Don't compare one method to the others and be consistent in taking your measurements/skinfolds/using the scale/etc.


I like a body fat monitor, but you have to take into consideration the differences in BF monitors to realize that none of the ways of determining body composition are 100% accurate or comparable to each other. So, whatever method you pick, stick with it to compare results to be able to monitor changes over time. So, in order of accuracy (most accurate to least accurate), here are some bits of info on the various body composition analysis methods.

DEXA Scan: This is like getting an x-ray or CT scan of the whole body. It literally looks at the inside of the body to see what is fat and what is bone, muscles, etc. The drawback to this method is that it assumes that each part of the body is symmetrical all the way around and that isn't necessarily true. For example, some people have larger quadriceps muscles on the front of the legs and more fat around the hamstrings on the back of the leg, or more fat in the stomach then in the low back. Another drawback is that it does use x-rays to determine body fat, and excessive exposure to them can be harmful. Plus, depending on where you live they may or may not be accessible or affordable.

Hydrostatic Weighing: This is a measurement of what you weigh underwater by measuring water displacement based on the fact that fat has less density then water and muscle, bones, etc. have a higher density so you are essentially only weighing the muscle, bones, etc. in the body. It has been the gold standard of body composition testing for years, but has recently been surpassed by DEXA scanning. The drawbacks are that you have to wear very little clothing while in a lab setting, plus you have to exhale all the air possible and hold your breath while under water to get an accurate reading. Generally, it is only accessible in a lab setting so it can be financially inaccessible.

Bod Pod: This is a measure similar to hydrostatic weighing only it uses the weight of the body and the air displacement of the body to determine body composition. The drawbacks to this are similar to the hydrostatic weighing. This is also hard to get to in some areas, although some large cities now have more accessible versions.

Bio-Electrical Impedance: This is the technology used by the body fat scales and the handheld devices. It basically uses an electrical current running through the body to estimate body fat because fat is not as conductive as muscle, bones, water, etc. in the body. There are several different versions of bio impedance though. The most accurate is the version in some gyms that uses an electrode at the hand and another at the foot so that the current goes through the full length of the body. The scale version would be the next most accurate because it measures from foot to foot so that the current flows through the midsection and lower limbs, which is where most people store most of their fat. That being said, it can give a higher reading then the actual body fat % because it assumes that the whole body is just as fat as the area where the current flows. The least accurate is the handheld device because the electrical current flows from hand to hand and through the shoulder region of the body. The reason it is the least accurate is that most people don't carry as much body fat in this area then they do lower in the body, so it will give a lower body fat reading then is actually in the whole body. Because of the differences in the way they determine body composition, there are different charts for what an acceptable body fat is based on the piece of equipment used, so if you choose one of these methods be sure to go by the chart in the book that comes with it. The drawbacks of this method are that hydration level can effect the reading quite a bit. So, if you use this measurement, make sure you are drinking plenty of water, haven't worked out in 12 hours, and don't compare measurements at different times in the menstrual cycle.

Calipers: Calipers determine body fat based on pinching skinfolds at various places on the body. If you use a formula that uses more skinfold sites on the body it is more accurate then the 1 or 3 site formulas, but they still only measure body fat at the skin level. The drawbacks are that they can't "see" the body fat around the organs (which is the most dangerous body fat) so their accuracy is a lot lower then the other methods. Also, there is a lot of variability in the skill level of the people using the calipers. They can artificially decrease body fat readings by pinching too hard or artificially increase body fat readings by pinching muscle in with the fat. Although they are available at any local supplement shop or online for anyone to use, they should only be trusted when used by someone who is specially trained in using them and can only be compared to their previous measurements if done by the same person due to variability in how each person does the measurements.

Measurements / Measurement Formulas: These are the least accurate for determining body fat because they can't tell if they are measuring muscle or fat, but they are great for seeing losses not shown on the scale. The formulas used to turn measurements into body fat % vary in accuracy so if you choose this method, be sure to stick with the same formula. This is probably the least expensive way of estimating body composition, but is also the least accurate, so you have to weigh your options. From the ACE Personal Trainer Manual here are the formulas for figuring this way:

Body Density for Women = 1.168297 - (0.002824 x abdomen in centimeters) + (0.0000122098 x abdomen in centimeters squared) - (0.000733128 x hips in centimeters) + (0.000510477 x height in centimeters) - (0.000216161 x age)

Body Density for Men = 1.21142 + (0.00085 x weight in kilograms) - (0.0005 x iliac measurement in centimeters) - (0.00061 x hip in centimeters) - (0.00138 x abdomen in centimeters)

Once you have body density you get percent fat with the following formula (495 / Body Density) - 450

For the mens formula the iliac measurement is the measure around the body at the iliac crest (the bony part of the pelvis at the top).