Heart rate shock
Options

ladybb7
Posts: 134 Member
ok so I bought a timex watch with a heart rate monitor And used it during my 50 minute step work out.... I have read mixed reviews on here... A lot of people say only the chest strap monitor is accurate but I figure this must be better than nothing... I reread my heart rate after every track and it estimated that I burned almost 900 calories! I was just using the myfitnesspal recommendations before which were much less... 550 or so... Thoughts on this?
0
Replies
-
It all depends on how much you weigh. I am still very heavy at 218 and I have burned close to that doing zumba classes and step classes. I have a polar HRM. So if you are heavier and kept your heart rate up for 50 mins it was probably a decent measurement. Maybe subtract 100 calories that you would burn anyway...0
-
They are very inaccurate. Timex is a good watch, but it isnt a good HRM. Return it, and take that money to buy a HRM with a chest strap.
And yes, you could possibly burn that much in step class if you were really working it. I sometimes burn upwards of 800 calories in Zumba!0 -
I have a Polar hrm with the chest strap and I always burn more than mfp says I should. I like it much better!! LOL Trust your hrm over mfp. MFP is just a guesstimate based on your weight. My hrm takes in my height, weight, age, bmi etc.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 396.6K Introduce Yourself
- 44.2K Getting Started
- 260.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.6K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 449 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.5K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions