Nike+ Sensor vs Treadmill Data
SmashleeWpg
Posts: 567 Member
Has anyone else out there tried running on a treadmill while using their Nike+ and sensor? I've done this a few times, and noticed that my sensor usually gives me a faster pace, and more distance covered than the treadmill... for instance, if I run a 10:30 minute mile per the treadmill, my sensor says I'm running a 10 minute mile.
Which data should I trust?? Suggestions??
I have calibrated my Ipod sensor several times, so I don't think that's the issue.
Which data should I trust?? Suggestions??
I have calibrated my Ipod sensor several times, so I don't think that's the issue.
0
Replies
-
I think the general consensus is that as the Nike + measures actual footfall rather than just the speed the ground is moving it's more accurate. Don't quote me on that though.0
-
I would go with the Nike+.
I run on treadmills at the gym and each one I have to use a different speed as they are all calibrated slightly differently. There is a difference of 1km per hour between the fastest and the slowest!0 -
Yep Nike+ should be more accurate. Just like WeightWars said - it watches your footfall where as the treadmill is just in constand motion!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions