Why am I not losing weight?

Options
I have been under my calories every day this week, and exercising and not eating all of the calories back. When I complete my diary, it says I should be 10 lbs lighter in 5 weeks--2 lbs a week like I want, but the scale isn't showing those results. Am I doing something wrong? Should I stick to cardio instead of the 30 day shred?
«13

Replies

  • KPaden1221
    KPaden1221 Posts: 433
    Options
    you're already really small.. those pounds are not gonna come off that easy.. it's gonna be much harder for you to lose weight.. and i dont think you'll lose 2 lbs a week. you need to change it to like .5 a week and up your calories and then you will probably start losing again.
  • szczepj
    szczepj Posts: 422
    Options
    You only have a few pounds left, trying to lose 2 lbs a week isn't going to work very well. Especially at this stage. You should probably switch to trying to lose .5 a pound a week and give your body some more food to jumpstart your metabolism.
  • Strive2BLean
    Strive2BLean Posts: 300 Member
    Options
    Looking at your posted pic, it doesn't seem like you need to lose much weight and you have lost 6 lbs. so maybe your body is adjusting right now and trying to tell you all it's gonna give up is those 6 lbs for now. Anyway, don't panic. Eventually it will kick in. Just keep eating well.
  • angela828
    angela828 Posts: 498 Member
    Options
    I agree with everything above me but also this -

    I did try the 30 day shred, twice. Back in like February/March I think. Before that I was losing 1-2 lbs a week consistently. Then when I did the 30 day shred, it decreased to nothing to 1lb a week. I quit it during level 3 and went back to losing 1-2lbs a week and then decided for summer I wanted to tone up so I starrted the shred again and again, my weight loss slowed to .5-1lb a week. I quit again during level 3 and now I am losing 1-2lbs a week again - which I prefer.

    The 30 day shred is great but it is different for everyone. Also, you don't have much to lose and if you don't eat your exercise calories your body is probably holding on to your weight. Up your calories, eat some back, and you should be okay. Do you only do the shred and no other cardio??

    Also don't take the "if you ate like this everyday you'd weigh ___________ in 5 weeks".. I've found from reading on here it is not accurate for a lot of people. I like seeing that low number but know it is not always realistic.

    And try measuring yourself.... you could be losing inches.
  • KPaden1221
    KPaden1221 Posts: 433
    Options

    Also don't take the "if you ate like this everyday you'd weigh ___________ in 5 weeks".. I've found from reading on here it is not accurate for a lot of people. I like seeing that low number but know it is not always realistic.

    i know this is right.. mine has never been right.. not even once!
  • kaitlinmre
    kaitlinmre Posts: 86 Member
    Options
    Yeah, I understand that losing 2 lbs a week is unrealistic sometimes but look at this girl:
    http://undressedskeleton.tumblr.com/beforeandafter
    She ate between 1000-1200 calories a day, and did an hour of cardio every day and that's the results she got. I'm eating around 1200 and doing the 30 day shred, and I'm not losing weight at all.
  • change_happens
    Options
    Hi. There could be a few contributing factors to your not losing weight. I am no expert, I just love to read :-) like the other ladies are saying, if you don't have that much weight to lose you won't see 2lb-a-week-results, more realistically. 1/2 pound or less a week seems more on target. Why? The larger you are the more weight your body will release in a short period of time.

    For example, my husband was 245 and is only 5'7". He dropped his calories and did no exercise and I literally watched 20lbs fall of of him in a matter of a few weeks. Me, on the other hand, I have had to work my butt off! I have to actually focus on the cardio and make sure I am actually burning fat by staying within my tarhet heart range.

    Just the other day I received an email from Jillian Michaels, a fitness newsletter. It was actually talking about the stress hormone, cortisol. She says that when you exercise for 2 hours or more in one session your body releases cortisol and your body decides that it is going to hold on to some of that fat you are trying hard to lose. I believe this to be true because there was a period of time where I watched every single thing that went into my mouth, worked out for long period of times, but did not see any drop on the scale.

    Another bit of information I read is to stagger your calories. Say for instance you are consuming 1200 calories a day. Well if you multiply that by 7 days in a week you are going to get 8400 calories consumed over time. To keep your body from becoming accustomed to the 1200 calorie days, which can slow down weight loss, you should consume your calories for the week over an uneven caloric consumption throughout the week. For instance, Monday you may want to eat 800 calories. Tuesday you could make it a hig calorie day and eat 1200 for the day plus the remainder 400 from the previous and consume 1200 on wednesday... Does that make sense?

    I just recently tried this, and I have read a few testimonials of others trying this and it has worked for them, as well as for me. You could also eat more calories for a week and then drop back down and that also tricks your body.

    My son, to get his last few pounds off, and he is already slim and trim, but he is a body builder, his body doesn't get rid of pounds easily so on order to force off those last five or ten pounds he sprints in a weighted vest. I also read (me and my reading) that adding a few pounds a day will increase your calorie burn because the heavier you are the more you burn.

    Like I said, I am no expert, just like to read. :-)

    Just last week I wasn't seeing the scale move and I had a high calorie day where I consumed 2600 cals over the course of a period of time from 1 pm - 11 pm, and the next morning I was down 8 oz. Oddly, I have still been dropping weight after that eat-everything-day. I really believe that switching it up really helps keep our body guessing. I did continue to exercise, as well as trying new dvd's so my body wouldn't get used to any one particular set of exercises because that could hinder your ability to burn the maximum amount of calories your body burns.

    Also, for me, Shred doesn't keep my heart rate up. So, I always do cardio even on those days that I do the 30 Day Shred.

    :-)
  • sarah307
    sarah307 Posts: 1,363 Member
    Options
    i only read your post, haven't read the replies so idk if this has already been repeated..
    but since you are close to your goal... definitely, in my opinion, you should change your goals to only lose 0.5 lbs/week as the closer you get to your goal..the less you need to lose and the less lbs you will lose... increase your calorie intake most likely. when I hit a plateau.. i increased by calories by 200 and starting losing weight again.

    i usually eat back at least most or some of my exercise calories

    edit:
    after reading a few more posts - definitely eat more. change your goals to lose less weight per week.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Options
    Cardio should burn more calories so adding that will probably help. If that is a current pic of you, you are probably going to need to do a lot of cardio and/or not eat much to lose 2 lbs a week. I'm sure you could do it but I'm also pretty sure you couldn't do it in a healthy manner.
  • KPaden1221
    KPaden1221 Posts: 433
    Options
    Yeah, I understand that losing 2 lbs a week is unrealistic sometimes but look at this girl:
    http://undressedskeleton.tumblr.com/beforeandafter
    She ate between 1000-1200 calories a day, and did an hour of cardio every day and that's the results she got. I'm eating around 1200 and doing the 30 day shred, and I'm not losing weight at all.

    from your picture you're already smaller than this girl.. and she had about 50 lbs to lose.. and she worked hard and did it, i'm sure the last few lbs didn't come off of her easily either. please atleast try upping your calories and changing you weight loss to .5 lbs a week for like 2 weeks and see how you do.. you should always NET atleast 1200 calories. For example if you eat 1200 calories then exercise and burn 400, you're only gonna NET 800, doing this all the time can make your body slip into starvation mode and you wont lose weight, you might even gain, your body is gonna take whatever you have and hold on to it b'c it's not getting what it needs. So.. if you eat 1200 calories burn 400 calories eat those 400 calories back. It'll do ya some good in the lnog run..
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,412 MFP Moderator
    Options
    Considering how you look, you need to change your goal to .5 lbs per week. You aren't eating enough. I hate to tell you, but the more you eat, the more you will lose. Also, if you don't eat enough, your body will take the protein from your muscle which in turns strinks your muscle and reduce the calories you burn. I have increased my caloric intake by 600 calories over a month and a half and each time I increase my intake, the more weight I lose. Also, keep in mind your body might be at it's low weight. You might be at a point where you can only change your body composition. Weight is kind of meaningless because there is such a thing as skinny fat (people who appear skinny have have high body fat. It's simple, Food is Fuel. If you don't fuel the machine, it shuts down.
  • tgh1914
    tgh1914 Posts: 1,036 Member
    Options
    I know you've heard it from me before, so I'm just gonna repeat what's been said already by me & others. You do need to give your body the fuel it needs so it doesn't hang on to that last stubborn fat. I definitely think you should change your goal to .5 loss per week and eat those extra calories.

    I also really think you should re-consider what your goal is. Is it really the number on a scale? or a certain look? I guess I mean when people are really close to the goal, weight becomes so arbitrary; we need to become more concerned with body composition (how much body fat vs lean muscle we have). I'd switch to those kind of goals. Lifting weights then becomes much more important in order to get you the added muscle which will burn fat. And, contrary to popular belief, it will NOT cause bulking up on a woman.

    I highly recommend reading through (& replying to) this thread: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/211420-relatively-light-people-trying-to-get-leaner?page=10#posts-3665213 This guy really knows his stuff and works with people a lot in your circumstance.

    Good luck. :wink:
  • kaitlinmre
    kaitlinmre Posts: 86 Member
    Options
    I know you've heard it from me before, so I'm just gonna repeat what's been said already by me & others. You do need to give your body the fuel it needs so it doesn't hang on to that last stubborn fat. I definitely think you should change your goal to .5 loss per week and eat those extra calories.

    I also really think you should re-consider what your goal is. Is it really the number on a scale? or a certain look? I guess I mean when people are really close to the goal, weight becomes so arbitrary; we need to become more concerned with body composition (how much body fat vs lean muscle we have). I'd switch to those kind of goals. Lifting weights then becomes much more important in order to get you the added muscle which will burn fat. And, contrary to popular belief, it will NOT cause bulking up on a woman.

    I highly recommend reading through (& replying to) this thread: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/211420-relatively-light-people-trying-to-get-leaner?page=10#posts-3665213 This guy really knows his stuff and works with people a lot in your circumstance.

    Good luck. :wink:

    I had my goal weight set to 130, but now I switched it to 135, because I realized that I do want to be more toned. My only "problem area" is my stomach, really, so I just need to lose the fat around my mid-section.
  • ladyhawk00
    ladyhawk00 Posts: 2,457 Member
    Options
    I know you've heard it from me before, so I'm just gonna repeat what's been said already by me & others. You do need to give your body the fuel it needs so it doesn't hang on to that last stubborn fat. I definitely think you should change your goal to .5 loss per week and eat those extra calories.

    I also really think you should re-consider what your goal is. Is it really the number on a scale? or a certain look? I guess I mean when people are really close to the goal, weight becomes so arbitrary; we need to become more concerned with body composition (how much body fat vs lean muscle we have). I'd switch to those kind of goals. Lifting weights then becomes much more important in order to get you the added muscle which will burn fat. And, contrary to popular belief, it will NOT cause bulking up on a woman.

    I highly recommend reading through (& replying to) this thread: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/211420-relatively-light-people-trying-to-get-leaner?page=10#posts-3665213 This guy really knows his stuff and works with people a lot in your circumstance.

    Good luck. :wink:

    This.

    You CANNOT expect your body to access the tiny bit of body fat you have at the rate of 2 lbs per week. It will not happen. If you DO lose at that rate, what you will be losing is muscle, not fat.

    The body, especially for females, prefers to have a cushion of fat. So you have to coax it to burn fat when you are at a lower BF%. When you are already lean, you need a very conservative deficit so the body KNOWS there is enough fuel coming in and it is safe to burn fat. Trying to beat it into submission will backfire. If you want to be lean AND strong, you have to give your body enough fuel to maintain the lean mass.

    And do not try to compare yourself and your progress to others - you are not in the same situation as someone with more to lose and it's comparing apples to watermelons. Be patient and go slow - you'll see MUCH better results. :flowerforyou:
  • angela828
    angela828 Posts: 498 Member
    Options
    That girl has her bones sticking out in some of those pictures! And every person is different..... just because she lost 2 lbs a week eating those calories and doing an hour of cardio everyday doesn't mean the same will be said for anyone. Everyone is different...
  • Mindful_Trent
    Mindful_Trent Posts: 3,954 Member
    Options
    Read this - it was just posted today, and directly addresses your questions. You would fall into #1 on his list.
    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/283663-not-losing-weight-you-re-asking-the-wrong-questions

    As others have said, you can NOT expect to lose 2 lbs per week. Heck, you'll be lucky to lose 1/2 a pound a week of fat. If you are losing much more than that, then you're probably losing muscle. Yes, it's frustrating, but it's just not possibly to quickly lose fat when you're down to those last few pounds.
  • sarah307
    sarah307 Posts: 1,363 Member
    Options
    Yeah, I understand that losing 2 lbs a week is unrealistic sometimes but look at this girl:
    http://undressedskeleton.tumblr.com/beforeandafter
    She ate between 1000-1200 calories a day, and did an hour of cardio every day and that's the results she got. I'm eating around 1200 and doing the 30 day shred, and I'm not losing weight at all.

    from your picture you're already smaller than this girl.. and she had about 50 lbs to lose.. and she worked hard and did it, i'm sure the last few lbs didn't come off of her easily either. please atleast try upping your calories and changing you weight loss to .5 lbs a week for like 2 weeks and see how you do.. you should always NET atleast 1200 calories. For example if you eat 1200 calories then exercise and burn 400, you're only gonna NET 800, doing this all the time can make your body slip into starvation mode and you wont lose weight, you might even gain, your body is gonna take whatever you have and hold on to it b'c it's not getting what it needs. So.. if you eat 1200 calories burn 400 calories eat those 400 calories back. It'll do ya some good in the lnog run..

    YES
  • weeziews
    weeziews Posts: 162 Member
    Options
    If you are doing strength training then you are gaining muscle and this is a good thing. I agree with everyone to change your goal to .5 lbs per week and definitely rethink your goal. Toning requires strength training and you will gain muscle that will also show up as weight gain or no weight loss. Take measurements, because you will continue to lose inches. I have only lost 3 lbs but have lost several issues and I am wearing a size smaller. It isn't always about weight, you can have NSV too!! Keep up the great work you are doing! You will get there.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,412 MFP Moderator
    Options
    I know you've heard it from me before, so I'm just gonna repeat what's been said already by me & others. You do need to give your body the fuel it needs so it doesn't hang on to that last stubborn fat. I definitely think you should change your goal to .5 loss per week and eat those extra calories.

    I also really think you should re-consider what your goal is. Is it really the number on a scale? or a certain look? I guess I mean when people are really close to the goal, weight becomes so arbitrary; we need to become more concerned with body composition (how much body fat vs lean muscle we have). I'd switch to those kind of goals. Lifting weights then becomes much more important in order to get you the added muscle which will burn fat. And, contrary to popular belief, it will NOT cause bulking up on a woman.

    I highly recommend reading through (& replying to) this thread: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/211420-relatively-light-people-trying-to-get-leaner?page=10#posts-3665213 This guy really knows his stuff and works with people a lot in your circumstance.

    Good luck. :wink:

    I had my goal weight set to 130, but now I switched it to 135, because I realized that I do want to be more toned. My only "problem area" is my stomach, really, so I just need to lose the fat around my mid-section.

    If you want abs, you need to strengthen your core and eat up! When you do eat, make sure you are eating enough calories (especially protein) to build muscle. You will probably gain weight but it shouldn't matter as you are buidling muscle. More muscle means more tone. I would suggest doing a custom setup (40% carbs, 40% protein, 20% fat). You to decrease your overall body fat and increase muscle mass. At this point, stop worrying about weight. Body composition is more important.
  • i_love_vinegar
    i_love_vinegar Posts: 2,092 Member
    Options
    Yeah, I understand that losing 2 lbs a week is unrealistic sometimes but look at this girl:
    http://undressedskeleton.tumblr.com/beforeandafter
    She ate between 1000-1200 calories a day, and did an hour of cardio every day and that's the results she got. I'm eating around 1200 and doing the 30 day shred, and I'm not losing weight at all.

    it looks like she was in high school through this entire thing...maybe a freshman in college...

    im guessing she had to take gym during school, and obviously walk around...how tall is she? how tall are you? it could also be that you are taller than her and need more calories than she does -- or less!

    ps: I think her body looks sortta unhealthy. I can't quite pinpoint it, but there is something odd looking to her arms and shoulders. You look rather thin from your avatar pic (although I can't see your entire body)...maybe you are at your healthy weight already, but just need to do more exercises to get toned :smile: Good luck!!!