Is my heart rate monitor wrong?

Francesca3162

I haven't bought one yet. I just figure 100 calories per mile for any walking/jogging I do and I normally don't count anything for my Pilates or Yoga....
Once I start doing more circuit stuff, I guess I will need to get one..

SteveHunt113

I have had my Polar FT7 for about 2 months now. I often walk & run on my NT treadmill.
I use water on my strap- not saturated though- I sweat pretty fast to help. I dont think I have had a strap connection problem.

Here is how my Polar has worked & I think its accurate. ( I just started working out hard in Mid Jan)
Anyway When I got my HR monitor I beat the treadmills calorie count every time. Usually I was a bit behind in the 1st 10 minutes...Then I caught up & then Passed it by the end of my workout.

Then I started matching the TM calorie count after about 1 months of use.

Now It is very hard for me to beat the Treadmill. My HR monitor calorie count is always lower...Sometimes alot lower. I am working out just as hard...But I am in better shape then I was just 2 months ago.

I will have to kick up my workout soon so I can burn more calories-( I have bursitis on my knees right now- so have had to take it slower the past week) Id like to at least match the Treadmills count again.

I've had the same experience: as my fitness level improves, I have to work harder just to burn the same number of calories. But I'm OK with that! Nothing wrong with getting stronger and more fit!

aminakhan1980

See, threads like these are what is freaking me out about buying one. $100+ is alot of money to me and I don't want to get something that may or may NOT be accurate. What is the point of getting one if we have no idea if it's working right or not. My weightloss is very slow now so I want to get a Polar so I can accurately log my calories in and out but everytime I start considering it again, I read things like this. So confused

Spamee

See, threads like these are what is freaking me out about buying one. $100+ is alot of money to me and I don't want to get something that may or may NOT be accurate. What is the point of getting one if we have no idea if it's working right or not. My weightloss is very slow now so I want to get a Polar so I can accurately log my calories in and out but everytime I start considering it again, I read things like this. So confused

I think my Polar is accurate. If you read the whole thread the OP stated later that hers isnt a Polar...Maybe the brand she has is not working right. Also if you purchase your Polar from bodytronics.com...they are cheaper then most places.

I really love having my HR monitor. I use it when doing kettlebells too.

sw0301

Return the Sportline & get a Polar! That's exactly what I just did. Sportline also wouldn't keep accurate distance. I got the Polar FT4 (bodytronics.com $60-ish!!!) & downloaded Runkeeper on my phone, now I feel very accurate for heart rate, distance & calories burned!

SteveHunt113

See, threads like these are what is freaking me out about buying one. $100+ is alot of money to me and I don't want to get something that may or may NOT be accurate. What is the point of getting one if we have no idea if it's working right or not. My weightloss is very slow now so I want to get a Polar so I can accurately log my calories in and out but everytime I start considering it again, I read things like this. So confused

I think you are not quit getting the point of the HRM. It will provide an estimate of calories burned. It is not 100% accurate ... it can't be if it's only using your heart rate. But, it's more accurate than, say, a website that is making a blind guess based on activity and time. It is making a guess based on your hear rate, which will go up as your body needs more oxygen to burn calories. As one gets into better shape, there body becomes more efficient so they actually burn less calories doing the same thing. Our HRM's will show a reduced caloric burn ... our hearts aren't working as hard because we don't need as much oxygen because we aren't burning as many calories. If anything, you should be encouraged by what the HRM is doing. This assumes your HRM allows you to enter your age, height and weight (as a minimum).

ALH1981

are you wetting the sensors before you put it on? (spit not water)....I had this problem and that was 1 problem the other was I had it up to far between my breasts.......I moved it to just to my rib cage and everything works fine now.

I have the polar FT4, and thought the cal burn was also too low. Spit not water? So you don't saturate it with water prior to working out? I will definitely try moving it down, I do keep it pretty high as well (based on that little diagram that came with it)

Ahhh this has been my problem with the FT4 also... so are you not meant to wet the whole thing?? Err... that is a massive issue - i've been doign this the whole time - and also, putting it ABOVE my rib cage... mmm thats interesting as i have had the LOWEST reads for a long time and couldn't figure it out,...

Also, how do you change the battery?

brenott

THANK YOU for all the suggestions!!!

I have been so frustrated. I have a Polar FT4 and my co-worker has a Timex. Her calorie burn is always so much higher than mine (by several hundreds of calories). I ran (actually ran/walked) for 90 minutes last week and burned about 900 calories, she burned about the same in half the time.

I thought maybe I got a lemon, but I'm going to try some adjustments first.

Spamee

Besides comparing Calories to your friends HR monitor. Did you compare Avg HR, Max HR etc?
id be curious to see what her Avg was compared to yours.

Your size vs her size matters also. My Dh & I went for a walk- both with our FT& HR monitors. he burned 50 more calories then me in the same amount of time. Although his Avg HR was less then mine...But I am smaller then him & also he is a male...

I have read that Timex over calculates calories...So even if you are burning less...if its accurate its better. (though frustrating!)

THANK YOU for all the suggestions!!!

I have been so frustrated. I have a Polar FT4 and my co-worker has a Timex. Her calorie burn is always so much higher than mine (by several hundreds of calories). I ran (actually ran/walked) for 90 minutes last week and burned about 900 calories, she burned about the same in half the time.

I thought maybe I got a lemon, but I'm going to try some adjustments first.

jeanneshaw1

I found a huge discrepancy today. My treadmill read that I burned 650 calories; my Polar HRM read 361 calories. How on earth could it be that far off? Weight is entered on the treadmill.

bsolada

Hello everyone, I am the OP and still having this problem with my Sportline Duo 1060. When I enter exercise calories on MFP it will tell me my burn should have been for instance about 500 calories, then my watch says something like 281 calories. Also working out with friend I burn so few calories it makes me not even want to do it, maybe it's time for a Polar? I hate to buy one then find out the calories are the same and it's just me.

Mr_Knight

Need details. What exercise, exactly, are you doing? For how long/far?

By the way, 300 calories is a significant burn. It is what a 150 pound person would burn running a full 5km/3 miles.

bsolada

FYI I did end up getting a new HRM last week. I got the Polar F4 (it's PINK!) and I really think this is more accurate. If anyone else is having this problem check into getting a new HRM. For instance, yesterday I did 35 mintues of ChaLEAN Extreme, I did a cardio video. Per my Polar HRM I burned 384 cals. I looked back on a prevoius 35 minute ChaLEAN Extreme workout and burned 180 calories total.

I now realize I was burning the same amount of calories but eating a fraction of them back. I think that has to do with me getting hungry and eating junk, now that I have a bettter read on cals burned there is more I can eat back. If you are having HRM problems I would look into getting a new one, I am so glad I did.