Calories Burned???

Touched670
Touched670 Posts: 97 Member
edited September 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
Today I walked 3 miles on the threadmill at the gym. I also wore my pedometer while doing so. Both the treadmill and pedometer had different readings as well as the MFP website. The treadmill and pedometer were a little over 100 calories off. They had the same time and distance though. I was walking between 3.6 and 3.8 mph. None of the three are even close to each other. I went with the MFP sites. But which is most accurate? ANYONE?

Replies

  • MrsRadder
    MrsRadder Posts: 207 Member
    Use a heart rate monitor that you enter in your height and weight. It's the only way to know
  • CountryDevil
    CountryDevil Posts: 819 Member
    The only way you are going to be even close to accurate is with a Heart Rate Monitor (HRM) Be sure you can enter your height and weight and has a chest strap.
  • sweetiebelle
    sweetiebelle Posts: 332 Member
    I have that problem also. I just decided if I get on my treadmill I use treadmill reading. I use my pedometer for my everyday walking.
  • 27strange
    27strange Posts: 837 Member
    I would add up the various numbers (pedometer, machine, MFP) and divide by 3 to get an average of the three measurements, then log the average.

    Better yet get a Heart Rate Monitor watch with the chest strap. Make sure it has the chest strap, that you record your height and weight, and that it measures calories burned.
  • _Khaleesi_
    _Khaleesi_ Posts: 877 Member
    I can't really see how a pedometer can accurately measure calories burned... and treadmills are notoriously flawed.
This discussion has been closed.