Most Accurate Calories Burnt Calculator
emmaNEEDSskinny
Posts: 317
This is really accurate because you get to put in your weight aswell
http://www.healthstatus.com/calculate/cbc
http://www.healthstatus.com/calculate/cbc
0
Replies
-
Thanks, that was great!0
-
http://www.freedieting.com/ This one is good as well. I used this long before mfp.0
-
This website also takes your weight into account. You enter it when you create your profile and when you check in. I think most online calculators do.....the most accurate is a heart rate monitor For me, I have found that online calculators are generous (but that may be because I've been working out for 5 years, so it takes more to get my heart pumping). Everyone's different, so no calculator will be truly accurate. As long as we keep moving, our bodies will be happy!!!0
-
MFP sets 45 mins of biking 12-14 mph = 671. Freedieting the same exercise is 740. The one suggested by the poster has the same exercise at 770 or so. So I'd go with the lowest so ensure I am still under my cals for day.0
-
For true accuracy, you need something that lets you enter Vo2Max.. because the more fit you become, the less calories you're going to burn. You also need something that will let you enter gender, height, age and heart rate. Which is why most people get an HRM, because they can do this all for you.
Bottom line is, there is no real way to accurately measure calories burned. Every tool(MFP, online calculators, HRM's) are all estimates. The only difference is that some methods have a more sophisticated way of doing it and thus are more trusted.0 -
excellent!!!0
-
For true accuracy, you need something that lets you enter Vo2Max.. because the more fit you become, the less calories you're going to burn. You also need something that will let you enter gender, height, age and heart rate. Which is why most people get an HRM, because they can do this all for you.
Bottom line is, there is no real way to accurately measure calories burned. Every tool(MFP, online calculators, HRM's) are all estimates. The only difference is that some methods have a more sophisticated way of doing it and thus are more trusted.
That's why I use: http://www.triathlontrainingblog.com/calculators/calories-burned-calculator-based-on-average-heart-rate/ with my hrm average bpm.
I use the 'average' vo2 max for women and it almost always comes in lower than the mfp output, which is ok with me.0 -
This is really accurate because you get to put in your weight aswell
http://www.healthstatus.com/calculate/cbc
I'm not sure how accurate it is because it doesn't ask for gender, age, height, or anything else, just weight. A 35 year old male weighing 185lbs., and a 35 year old female at the same weight, are not going to burn the same calories.
Any calorie calculator is just going to be an estimate, but I like this one myself..... http://www.braydenwm.com/calburn.htm0 -
lol guys i was just giving you a calaculator!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 423 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions