Polar vs. Timex HRMs???
abby459
Posts: 694 Member
Has anyone actually done a side by side comparison of a Polar HRM vs a Timex one. I got the Timex Ironman Road Trainer about a month ago. Then I read some posts on here were people randomly said that Timex HRMs are not accurate in calories. So I was wondering if anyone has thoughts on this. This is a newer model....I dont know if that makes a difference. But I want to be accurate since I am supposed to be eating back my calories. Any advice or comparisons that people have done??
0
Replies
-
I've had a couple of different Polar models as well as a Timex Ironman HRM. I felt that the Timex calorie calculations were pretty close to what I got with my Polar's so I went with the Timex numbers with no problems. I'd still be using my Timex if it really was waterproof like they claimed. I found out the hard way that it wasn't so now I've moved onto a Garmin...0
-
thanks I am hoping its right....I really dont want to have to spend the money for yet another HRM....but then again I want to be accurate so I dont overeat exercise cals!0
-
Both are pretty accurate to their specifications. I use a Polar FT7 and my lady uses a Timex. Doing the same routine, we both burn the appropriate number of calories given age, weight, gender, HR and whatnot.0
-
thanks...for now I am subtracting 50 cals from what it gives me for every 30mins of working out....just to be sure I am not overeating my workout cals0
-
I have the same Timex and I think my calories are too high too, even though I am above my target HR during my whole workout, I still find it high! I may try a polar, this is my 2nd HRM, I had a GSI which I find reads too low! Annoying to say the least!0
-
I think Timex is crap at calories burned.. ESP for women. I once walked on a treadmill at an incline with a Timex, for 30 minutes speed around 3.0, it said I burned 580 calories. Um no.
I do a similar workout with my Polar (first FT7 and now FT60) and only burn 200-300 calories.
Bottom line, ditch the Timex as soon as you can.0 -
you could burn 500 cals in 30 mins easy! i used to do it all the time walking on a 15 incline at 3.0-3.5 mph. i stop doint that because i would over train.....my HR would be up in the 160-180 range. I would never get a Timex..... I use a Polar RS100 And LOVE the damn thing!! hands down!0
-
I don't have a Timex, but in messages on here it has been mentioned that you cannot enter sex in it and it is by default set for male. I would suggest for men it would probably not be that bad, but for women it will overestimate calories.0
-
thanks for the replies....I actually got a Garmin for christmas, which I hear is the most accurate out there, so I am set now!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions