Discontinuity between treadmill and mfp
![cfrock](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/68bb/0aae/942c/92b4/3afa/2e11/5a48/aa70f61a956ace2cb25cdfd2db3289ebe526.jpg)
cfrock
Posts: 37
Ok so some stats first.
Age: 20
Weight: 209
Height: 5 ft10 in
So let's say I walk on the treadmill for 30 minutes at 4 mph and no incline with an average heart rate of about 150-160 (my treadmill has an HRM assuming you're holding on to the handles, which I don't always because I like to swing my arms). MFP says I burned 237 calories whereas my treadmill says I burned around 150. Also, my treadmill does not take into account height, weight, or age. Which one would you say is more accurate?
Age: 20
Weight: 209
Height: 5 ft10 in
So let's say I walk on the treadmill for 30 minutes at 4 mph and no incline with an average heart rate of about 150-160 (my treadmill has an HRM assuming you're holding on to the handles, which I don't always because I like to swing my arms). MFP says I burned 237 calories whereas my treadmill says I burned around 150. Also, my treadmill does not take into account height, weight, or age. Which one would you say is more accurate?
0
Replies
-
If your machine isn't asking at least your weight - I think I would find a number partway between the two and go with that.
The treadmills that I use ask your age, your weight and such. Since it asks for that information - I go with my treadmill (which is always less than MFP has for the same amount of time).
If MFP says 237 and your treadmill says 150 .. I would put in around 200 and call it even.0 -
i would go with the lower, just to be safe. i know everyone doesn't have money for a HRM, but i got the polar ft4 on ebay for around $70 and i love it! never have to guess how many calories i've burned again!0
-
I have the same problem...the treadmill at school says I burned less than what MFP says I burned. So, I'm gonna keep using the treadmill..but I won't actually log it until I get a hrm...my boyfriend says it's more acurate. I also decided not to eat back the bonus calories..because I am not even sure what the actual burn was.0
-
I would say the MFP is more accurate because it takes into account your height/weight/age but I still find MFP tells me I burn more than a heart rate monitor (the ones with a chest strap not the treadmill one) which are the most accurate. My guess... closer to MFP but really somewhere in between.0
-
MFP will be CLOSER but you still need to get a heart rate monitor because that's the best way to know.0
-
Don't hold on to the handles unless you have to as well, that makes the workout easier, so save doing that for when you get too tired.0
-
4 mph = 15 minute miles = very edge of slow jog & fast walk
at your weight I'd expect you to burn north of 100 kcals per mile
while MFP is often wrong, the gym machines are even more wrong0 -
i say use mfp and if you feel like the walk really took something out of you then add 20 - 50 more calories....your weight plays a huge part in your caloric burn also mfp calories is the bare minimum you should be burning during a particular exercise.
good luck!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 437 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions