2 problems
Options
Replies
-
Thank you good sir. Have you had your daily dose of SPAMALOT?Bad Spellers of the world..... UNTIE!0 -
The post had to do with that article from msn. But still why attack congress when the facts are probably more involved than declaring pizza a veggie.I read it in La Prensa not via msn.0 -
I'm aloud to dissagree with a clearly biast article that is used to make a point.As much as I love a political debate, especially when it has to do with Congress meddling in people's lives, this thread will be locked and trashed by a mod in 3, 2, 1...
Yes but your credibility is lost through horrific spelling.
aloud=allowed
dissagree = disagree
and biast = biased.
THANK YOU!!0 -
I give up.0
-
Yes. You're better served discussing any flaws in the article's content than commenting on the source or labeling it.Op what exactly is incorrect about the article? You seem to be as biased as you are claiming the article to be.
This coming from a guy that has a huge beef with the media and their bias. It's the content, though, that needs to be analyzed.
Exactly. I fear that the OP is ill-equipped to do this. Thus the partisan attack vs an analytical analysis of the actual article.0 -
Thank you good sir. Have you had your daily dose of SPAMALOT?Bad Spellers of the world..... UNTIE!
Spam has corn syrup and enamal in it. It'll make you died. You should know this by now.0 -
Depending on the topic, even disagreeing with flaud logic or fact isn't aloud.
And flaud = flawed
aloud=allowed
*Educating the uneducated since 1988.*
*trolling the oblivious since 1999*0 -
BTW did anyone ever consider that maybe there was something attached to the new health bill that could be bad for us. That is how most bills get passed. They get tucked in for a nice comfy ride to be an undeclared bill. Sneaky isn't it.0
-
I would love to take this post seriously but after all of the grammatical mistakes I just can't.0
-
BTW did anyone ever consider that maybe there was something attached to the new health bill that could be bad for us. That is how most bills get passed. They get tucked in for a nice comfy ride to be an undeclared bill. Sneaky isn't it.
Why don't you actually address the article you posted FIRST? Then rant about whatever might be attached to it?0 -
I bow down to your perfection almighty master.I would love to take this post seriously but after all of the grammatical mistakes I just can't.
and hay only a few came up as misspelled. 0 -
You mean this? (To the person who posted this) that was my opening statement.BTW did anyone ever consider that maybe there was something attached to the new health bill that could be bad for us. That is how most bills get passed. They get tucked in for a nice comfy ride to be an undeclared bill. Sneaky isn't it.
Why don't you actually address the article you posted FIRST? Then rant about whatever might be attached to it?0 -
reverse race card: My def: Any attempt to stop thwart conversation of a valid point.I would love to take this post seriously but after all of the grammatical mistakes I just can't.
Declaring a race card is in no way an attempt to call anyone racist as I do not believe the person I am qoating to be such. I'd say backwards compliment but the quote is not a compliment either. BTW I'm sure you know the correct term I am looking for so please oblige me with the correct term.0 -
You mean this? (To the person who posted this) that was my opening statement.BTW did anyone ever consider that maybe there was something attached to the new health bill that could be bad for us. That is how most bills get passed. They get tucked in for a nice comfy ride to be an undeclared bill. Sneaky isn't it.
Why don't you actually address the article you posted FIRST? Then rant about whatever might be attached to it?
No you didn't. You know for a fact that the facts aren't there? That is called an biased opinion backed up by nothing.0 -
What are you talking about?
You mean this? (To the person who posted this) that was my opening statement.BTW did anyone ever consider that maybe there was something attached to the new health bill that could be bad for us. That is how most bills get passed. They get tucked in for a nice comfy ride to be an undeclared bill. Sneaky isn't it.
Why don't you actually address the article you posted FIRST? Then rant about whatever might be attached to it?
No you didn't. You know for a fact that the facts aren't there? That is called an biased opinion backed up by nothing.0 -
Well, this thread has certainly (pooped) the bed. :laugh:
This is why political topics aren't suited for the main forums.0 -
I can't tell if I'm being trolled or if the OP is denser than muscle0
-
I tolerate turtles.0
-
Between the horrible spelling and weird ranting, I am completely confused. :huh: But wait,pizza as a vegetable?! HELL YA! :laugh:0
-
But wait,pizza as a vegetable?! HELL YA! :laugh:
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.9K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.4K Fitness and Exercise
- 403 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 983 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions