Question on WHAT YOU MONITOR

andyloosbrock

I have ready so many MFP success stories. And it seems a lot of them ONLY monitor calories. Not fat. Not carbs, sodium, or anything else. What are you opinions on this? Should we be watching those other things if the goal is to lose weight? I just want to see my weight number go down. I'd rather be SKINNY FAT than FAT FAT.

jojoworks

I think it depends on people's individual health needs. Some folks are diabetic and need to watch sugars. Some are hypertensive and need to watch sodium. Some know enough about food to know they're eating tons of healthy fruits and veggies and know they absolutely getting enough fiber.

Me personally, I'm pre-hypertensive and am trying to avoid taking medication so am trying to balance my sodium/potassium by decreasing sodium and increasing potassium so I monitor both of those. I don't monitor fiber because I know I'm excellent in that category. I don't monitor sugars because I don't eat any sugar beyond what's in my fruits and veggies and I know they'll say I'm eating over goal, but since they're healthy foods eaten in moderation I don't care. In addition to potassium and sodium and calories I also measure fat and protein and carbs.

I think its awesome that we can pick and choose the categories. I have monitored different categories at different times.

good luck!

lynntfuzz

I'm just watching calories. But I find if I eat a lot of sugary things, I know that I use up my calories and still feel starving. So, while someday I'd like to be a little bit more cognizant of my fat intake, sodium intake, fiber intake.... now I'm just basically watching calories, but staying away from eating as many sugary things as I used to. If I ever try to go low carb, I just don't do well. It doesn't work for me. Based on my experimenting, just watching calories and not going crazy, crazy with the sugar seems to work. For me. What are your nutrition goals?

FearAnLoathing

I have ready so many MFP success stories. And it seems a lot of them ONLY monitor calories. Not fat. Not carbs, sodium, or anything else. What are you opinions on this? Should we be watching those other things if the goal is to lose weight? I just want to see my weight number go down. I'd rather be SKINNY FAT than FAT FAT.

Im monitering you...and I saw what you did today

katie3kids

I usually try to have a high protein and high fiber diet but low carb. I feel fuller when I eat more proteins and whole grains. I try to keep the "unhealthy" fat low and also supplement with Udo's 3-6-9 oil for my healthy fats. Since my cholesterol was toward the high end, I also try to include insoluble fiber foods to help lower it. I think someone else commented that it really depends on your personal health situation. You could ask your doctor at your next physical what they recommend?

josery1630

I think total calories is what you should focus on now. When you get down to the last few pounds, then you need to focus on that other stuff. There's my $.02.

sunraze

I monitor calories overall but try to stay away from sugar and eat plenty of protein. I dont really worry about the fat. If the other two are good then fat isnt an issue. A little of the good fat is a good thing. Sugar---always a bad thing.

SergeantSunshine_reused

You will lose weight in a moderate calorie deficit. Tracking macros can change body composition.

I track all macros and make sure to try and get my minimum protein/fat and fill the rest in with carbs. I track sodium so I know when Ill be retaining water. Anything else is too much IMO because I have no medical need to

nukehiker

the main macro's that i monitor are proteins, carbs, and fat. i recently added sodium and sugars to that but those last 2 can frustrate you since some foods and or supplements can have high sugar or sodium numbers

76tech

I lost almost 70 lbs. watching calories only. Now that I'm at a much lower bf%, and have started lifting weights as well as cardio/conditioning, I'm monitoring protein as well.

vs1023

I track my carbs, fat, sugar and protein closely. I want to be sure I get all my protein, low sugar, meet carbs with whole foods and be sure to eat good fats and meet my requirement. It has worked for me in the past so I'll keep doing it.

tjradd73

I have ready so many MFP success stories. And it seems a lot of them ONLY monitor calories. Not fat. Not carbs, sodium, or anything else. What are you opinions on this? Should we be watching those other things if the goal is to lose weight? I just want to see my weight number go down. I'd rather be SKINNY FAT than FAT FAT.

for my first 45lbs I cut out regular soda and started lowering my cals, for my next 55lbs I watched my cals and sodium very closely, and for my last 15lbs, I watch cals, sodium and protein!!!! Start with cals...work your way to "clean" eating closer to the end of your weightloss...it's really a slow steady progression!!

good luck!

tacticalhippie

Fat, Carbs, Protein, Fibre and Sodium.
I can bloat like a mofo!

justaskforbrandy

I track calories, sodium and fiber... I also try to get in as much protein as I can, but I never seem to reach my goal lol

Kasya007

I track calories, carbohydrates, fat, protein, potassium & iron. The latter two because it's easy to be deficient of such vital nutrients when dieting. (You'll notice that the majority of diaries you skim through here are very unbalanced.) With that being said, I also rack up some high mileage every week through distance running, which causes a loss of those nutrients, and although I don't know how much I've sweat out, I aim for my goal or just above it...at least with iron. The best part is that since I've started tracking & balancing those two, I have actually felt better. I have little to no fatigue in the day, really quick muscle recovery after long runs & I'm sleeping like a baby at night (which is saying something because I've gotten jack for sleep in the last year and a half).

You can lose by just counting calories, but will you be as healthy? Who knows? It's all about what's important to you and your lifestyle.

Oh, I also take a peek at my sodium every few days, but I don't deem it as important, because if you're drinking your water & eating fairly healthy, you'll know approximately where you stand, (which, if you've had anything processed is most likely at or near the limit.)

Cheers man, happy losing!

rileysowner

I monitor calories, sodium (I have high blood pressure), fibre, and protein. Nothing else. I wouldn't monitor fibre and protein if I didn't find keeping them high helps me keep feeling full.

rileysowner

I track calories, carbohydrates, fat, protein, potassium & iron. The latter two because it's easy to be deficient of such vital nutrients when dieting. (You'll notice that the majority of diaries you skim through here are very unbalanced.) With that being said, I also rack up some high mileage every week through distance running, which causes a loss of those nutrients, and although I don't know how much I've sweat out, I aim for my goal or just above it...at least with iron. The best part is that since I've started tracking & balancing those two, I have actually felt better. I have little to no fatigue in the day, really quick muscle recovery after long runs & I'm sleeping like a baby at night (which is saying something because I've gotten jack for sleep in the last year and a half).

You can lose by just counting calories, but will you be as healthy? Who knows? It's all about what's important to you and your lifestyle.

Oh, I also take a peek at my sodium every few days, but I don't deem it as important, because if you're drinking your water & eating fairly healthy, you'll know approximately where you stand, (which, if you've had anything processed is most likely at or near the limit.)

The problem with monitoring potassium is since it is not required on nutritional labels, the amount showing in your diary will likely be wrong. At least it always has been in mine.
Cheers man, happy losing!

grapenutSF

I focus mostly on calories and protein. Since I eat pretty clean, I don't get obsessive about the others, though I'm loosely aware of them. It helped to be aware of those because I noticed my iron was consistently low and then decided to take an iron supplement (might help my energy level, which has had ups and downs).

SusanneWhittington

calories, carbs, protein, fat, sodium and cholesterol, will exchange cholesterol with sugar though, as I seem to have no problem with cholesterol, but sodium and sugar.

Kasya007

The problem with monitoring potassium is since it is not required on nutritional labels, the amount showing in your diary will likely be wrong. At least it always has been in mine.

The database is ALMOST ALWAYS wrong, which is why I LOVE the edit button. There are plenty of resources online that show the potassium in many natural foods. Also, if it's a processed product & it's not labelled, you can easily get the amount by calling the company through their 1-800 #. Easy as pie.

It takes a lot of time to build up a fairly accurate personal database in the beginning, but once it's there, it's quick and painless.

havalinaaa

I lost the first 20 pounds by cutting out sugar and being slightly more thoughtful about portion sizes. Once that didn't seem to be enough, I started watching calories and now I monitor my protein, fat, carb, fiber, and calcium. I watch protein because I want to retain as much muscle mass as I can while still losing weight, fats because I like to see what my sources of fat are, carbs just to fill out my day, calcium because as a woman it's super important for me so I can maintain bone density, and fiber because when I go over/under I have digestion problems. If I'd used MFP at the beginning I would have watched my sugar, but now that I have it under control I don't worry about it (I used to be a HUGE candy junkie).

abellante_0205

I found monitoring my sodium helped me a LOT!!!!! Calories helped too but eh... lol Sodium and sugars is what hurts me mostly!

Sidesteal

I think it depends on people's individual health needs.

Ultimately this. I am not diabetic and I have very low blood pressure.

I watch calories, protein, fat, carbs in that order of importance, and I don't have a reason to track anything else.

weightofyourskin

I track calories, carbs, protein, fat, sodium and Vitamin A.

Sodium for health reasons. I think the FDA recommends 2500 mg a day... Health Canada says adults don't need more than 1500. My mom has high blood pressure, so I'm trying to avoid that.

Vitamin A because I'm taking Accutane which is a strong vitamin A derivative. So if I have too much vitamin A in my diet that increases my chances of vitamin A toxicity.

bcattoes

I have no idea what "we" should monitor as I'm sure that is not the same for everyone. I monitor calcium, iron, saturated fat, calories, protein and carbs, because these are things I'm concerned about getting too much or too little of.

gymshoe42

i track calories only. My belief is that by doing so, I'm already watching what I eat and eating better. It sucks to know how long it takes to burn 150 calories on the treadmill ...do I really want to eat this donut that will take me 15 seconds to eat. I find I'm naturally keeping everything else in check. Besides, the amount of time to track even more things would likely discourage me from tracking anything....so... I track only a few things (calories and my workouts) and do it well.

cofakid

i only monitor calories but im only 5 months in. I find that my basic macros (carbs, protein, fat) all seem to be ok even without me monitoring them. In time i might monitor other things or i might not depending on how i go. I'm iron deficien so i might monitor that, and i know i eat a lot of salty things and add salt to a lot of meals, so if im not losing weight i'll start monitoring that. if i decide i want to uild more muscles i'll monitor my protein.

I think its an individual thing as to what "level" of healthy eating your aiming for, personal goals and personal health. Calories is the basic starting point and it might be all you need or you might need to monitor other things too.

Debbe2

Calories, Protein, FIber, Carbs, Sugar and Fat. Fat could be Sodium makes no difference to me. I really care most about
Calories, Protein and Sugar

Lyadeia

I have ready so many MFP success stories. And it seems a lot of them ONLY monitor calories. Not fat. Not carbs, sodium, or anything else. What are you opinions on this? Should we be watching those other things if the goal is to lose weight? I just want to see my weight number go down. I'd rather be SKINNY FAT than FAT FAT.

Well, if I had my choice, I'd go back in time and do more heavy weight lifting to avoid the skinny fatness cause it's taking me longer to get to my goal since I went from "fat fat" to "skinny fat" to "lean and fit." But I digress.

To just lose weight, you only really need to look at calories unless you are sensitive to things like dairy, gluten, sugar, etc. like you have an allergy or condition such as diabetes.

To make a total transformation of your body composition I think the other things are important. You need protein to build or maintain muscle mass, for example. You can lose weight cutting protein, but you risk losing muscle and will still look soft and mushy at your goal weight.

I look at saturated fats for health reasons because of cholesterol issues in the past. When I am able to keep my sat. fats. lower, I can keep my cholesterol in check. But it doesn't mean much for weight loss, really. As long as I am under my calorie goal, I will lose pounds.

I also look at fiber. Being less bloated and having more "regularity" is important to me. Again, health reason other than weight loss.

ninerbuff

Just my calories. I know I'll always be over in sodium (I'm Asian so I use soy sauce, MSG, etc. when I cook) and protein.


A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition