Accuracy of Exercise Calories Burned

diana_marie8302

So I recently joined gym and noticed that the # of calories the machines at the gym show I've burned are usually far less than what MFP calculates. I have been going with the #s the machines at the gym show me but does anyone know which is more accurate or which you feel more confident in choosing to go with? Any help or suggestions would be super appreciated!

johncaraher

How much less? 5% 10%?

I would tend to go with what the machine said because I want to be conservative about the estimate, but the machine may not "know" your weight. It may not know your age, whether your movements are efficient, and a variety of other factors. I just googled the topic and found a claim that the fitness machines tend to actually overestimate the calories in most studies.

What machines are you using? Do you input any information about weight, age, gender, etc.?

sondra216379

Yeah, my bike always shows less than what MFP says....but I use MFP becasue I have always wondered how that machine is going to know how many calories I have burned since it doesn't know my age, weight, etc

rockerbabyy

personally (if i didnt have my HRM), i would go by the machines if it asked for age/weight/etc..
when i use the elliptical, my HRM gives me a lower number than the machine (anywhere from 20-100 calories). MFP would give me as much as 400 more..

mollyb33

I've heard it mentioned by several people who have HRM that say MFP is a little too giving when it comes to calories burned. Most of the time I base my numbers on the machine or HRM because it knows the speed, intensity, and effort I actually put in versus a general number submitted by another individual.

diana_marie8302

The machines I've used ask for weight but don't ask for age and they also have HRM in the machines.... so does that change anyone's answers?