We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

HRM calories, walking

NovemberJune
NovemberJune Posts: 2,525 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
Are HRM calorie estimates less accurate for walks? I took my kids for a 70 minute walk today, pulling them in the wagon. According to my HRM, my heart rate was from the low to high end of my target zone most of the time. I felt like I was working but not too strenuously. Well it said I burned 574!

Is it at all accurate? I'm used to burning about 10 calories per minute doing much more intense exercises. I do think my HRM overestimates in general because I'm near my max heart rate a lot.

It's a polar ft4 btw.

Forgive any typos, posting from mobile is difficult ;)

Replies

  • NovemberJune
    NovemberJune Posts: 2,525 Member
    Actually, thinking about it, I'd probably burn 800 calories in 70 minutes of rollerblading. But I also feel like I can barely go on after about 35 minutes of that! Lol. I could have kept walking another 30 minutes or so ;)
  • NovemberJune
    NovemberJune Posts: 2,525 Member
    Bump :)
  • AmyRhubarb
    AmyRhubarb Posts: 6,890 Member
    I usually burn 300+ when I go for an hour long walk. If you're keeping a good pace, it adds up!
  • gsager
    gsager Posts: 977 Member
    I think the polar was right.
  • Reckabek
    Reckabek Posts: 487 Member
    I burned 325 after a 60 min walk! Fast walking for me over a bridge! I was impressed that walking could burn that much, it was so easy and peaceful to!
  • clarebrad
    clarebrad Posts: 188 Member
    I burn about that on my polar FT4. 70 mins is decent, i always make sure i am at least in the zone a good amount of the time, having my hrm has made me push harder on walk. Even when i go on shorter walks with the dog, but heart rate about 130 ish, i burn nearly 200 cals.
  • Holy wow.. I've been wanting a heart rate montior.. and now I am determined to get one.. like NOW
  • Yours is a Polar and has the strap - so my guess is it was on target. As long as you wet the strap to make the communication fluid, there is no reason it wouldn't be accurate :) So... from my standpoint, don't worry about the over estimation, just throw yourself in for a good walk and enjoy the burn of the calories :D
  • Coolhand1969
    Coolhand1969 Posts: 821 Member
    What I keep wondering about is if one should subtract the calories from doing nothing for the amount of time of the exercise from the exercise calories....
  • Hood25
    Hood25 Posts: 201 Member
    I'd say its pretty accurate especially if you were pulling a wagon and gettting your heart rate in your zone for that long of a time. My polar FT4 actually is lower compared to my treadmill and especially the MFP calculations. I think it is more accurate. I actually did 45 minutes on the treadmill and burned over 300 calories and immediately went outside and put weed killer on our lawn with a pushy thing and burned over 200 calories in 20-25 minutes! My guess is my heart rate was already up from working out and just doing brisk yard work kept me in the calorie burn zone.
  • abnerner
    abnerner Posts: 452 Member
    Absolutely! Just because you don't feel totally winded and exhausted after doesn't mean you didn't have a good work out!
This discussion has been closed.