Fitbit or HRM?

2»

Replies

  • shoby68
    shoby68 Posts: 30
    I have a garmin gps watch with a hrm strap which is great for running, keeps track of calories burned and distance traveled. Wouldn't be much use for indoor activities which sounds more like what you are looking into so the fitbit might be better.
  • TinkrBelz
    TinkrBelz Posts: 866 Member
    I think I'm leaning towards a HRM now. It's just not suitable for sports (not that this is a huge deal). My understanding is that you have to wear both the chest piece and watch, as the chest piece alone won't record data.

    If it has a chest strap, it will also have a watch that is transports the data to. I bought a cheap one off of Amazon because I just was not sure if I would like one. I love it. So, once this one breaks, I will probably buy a nicer one like a Polar. But for now, my cheap HRM (chest strap and watch) are great!
  • lizard053
    lizard053 Posts: 2,344 Member
    Both! They each measure different things, so they really work best together. I really enjoy my fitbit. It's gotten me to be more active. I'm trying to walk up stairs the 10 times it recommends. I'm striving for my 10,000 steps a day. It's great for adjusting my calories for a particularly active (non-exercise) day. Where the HRM is fantastic for helping me maximize my workouts. It helps me stay in the zone I want for cardio, it measures my calorie burn based on my heart rate, and it stores the information for me. It even gives me weekly totals if I want! Truly, both together have really helped me increase my fitness level!
  • ashleylucas21wechanged
    ashleylucas21wechanged Posts: 42
    I think I'm leaning towards a HRM now. It's just not suitable for sports (not that this is a huge deal). My understanding is that you have to wear both the chest piece and watch, as the chest piece alone won't record data.

    If it has a chest strap, it will also have a watch that is transports the data to. I bought a cheap one off of Amazon because I just was not sure if I would like one. I love it. So, once this one breaks, I will probably buy a nicer one like a Polar. But for now, my cheap HRM (chest strap and watch) are great!

    It only transports so far though doesn't it? I'm leaning towards a HRM but this wouldn't be suitable for kickboxing. I think everything else I could manage with.
  • MeliciousGibson
    MeliciousGibson Posts: 248 Member
    I have the FitBit Ultra - and I have to admit that I absolutely LOVE it! Yes, it is mainly geared towards steps taken and stairs climbed, but if I set the stopwatch for the start of a workout, it monitors my caloric burn during that time and gives me a breakdown in 5 minute intervals, so I can see how hard I worked. The graphs and charts it gives you really helps you see how much of the day you've spent sedentary, light, moderate and high activity.

    It syncs with MFP, and I like that it tells me how many calories I burned during the day (BMR + Activity calories).

    I DESPERATELY want a Polar FT7, but I have to wait until I complete my next goal - getting my ACE Group Fitness Instructor Certification!
  • msudaisy28
    msudaisy28 Posts: 267 Member
    I think I'm leaning towards a HRM now. It's just not suitable for sports (not that this is a huge deal). My understanding is that you have to wear both the chest piece and watch, as the chest piece alone won't record data.

    If it has a chest strap, it will also have a watch that is transports the data to. I bought a cheap one off of Amazon because I just was not sure if I would like one. I love it. So, once this one breaks, I will probably buy a nicer one like a Polar. But for now, my cheap HRM (chest strap and watch) are great!

    It only transports so far though doesn't it? I'm leaning towards a HRM but this wouldn't be suitable for kickboxing. I think everything else I could manage with.

    I have a Polar HRM that is a chest strap and watch unit and I love it. The chest strap is what collects the data and it transmits it to the watch so that you can see what your heart rate is at, how many calories you've burned, etc. But I don't think that you *have* to wear the watch on your wrist - it should just be close enough to recieve the transmission. So if you could fasten it to your clothes (maybe around the strap to a tank top?) it might not get in the way so much yet you'd still get the data for later.
  • ashleylucas21wechanged
    ashleylucas21wechanged Posts: 42
    I think I'm leaning towards a HRM now. It's just not suitable for sports (not that this is a huge deal). My understanding is that you have to wear both the chest piece and watch, as the chest piece alone won't record data.

    If it has a chest strap, it will also have a watch that is transports the data to. I bought a cheap one off of Amazon because I just was not sure if I would like one. I love it. So, once this one breaks, I will probably buy a nicer one like a Polar. But for now, my cheap HRM (chest strap and watch) are great!

    It only transports so far though doesn't it? I'm leaning towards a HRM but this wouldn't be suitable for kickboxing. I think everything else I could manage with.

    I have a Polar HRM that is a chest strap and watch unit and I love it. The chest strap is what collects the data and it transmits it to the watch so that you can see what your heart rate is at, how many calories you've burned, etc. But I don't think that you *have* to wear the watch on your wrist - it should just be close enough to recieve the transmission. So if you could fasten it to your clothes (maybe around the strap to a tank top?) it might not get in the way so much yet you'd still get the data for later.

    I didn't even think of that! It is a bit larger than the fitbit but that could probably work.
  • sweebum
    sweebum Posts: 1,060 Member
    I have a Polar that I don't use the wristband because the battery died, but I still wear the strap when I do my elliptical because the machine picks up on it. I looked at the Fitbit because it syncs to MFP, but after reading the reviews of it breaking in a couple of months and some sync issues, I opted to not get it. I also don't believe it can really track my sleep patterns. I'm currently looking at the bodybugg because they have a model that will sync with my android phone so no need for the wristband. It also syncs to the iPhone/iPod Touch. For those that currently have the Fitbit, how sturdy do you think the device is?

    I've had mine almost 2 years, bought it used off ebay. I've dropped it at least 25 times, and washed it twice (dried once). It's slightly worn on the "hinge" part but still going strong. My sisters on her 2nd one after 1 1/2 years, but she does 2 hours of cardio a day (fitness instructor) and she washed hers on the steam cycle :laugh:

    Both my Mom and I use it for sleep patterns, and it tells you how many times you woke up and when.

    A bodybugg is about as accurate, but isn't small, and it has a monthly fee to get your data off it.
  • k8lyn_235
    k8lyn_235 Posts: 507 Member
    I think I'm leaning towards a HRM now. It's just not suitable for sports (not that this is a huge deal). My understanding is that you have to wear both the chest piece and watch, as the chest piece alone won't record data.

    If it has a chest strap, it will also have a watch that is transports the data to. I bought a cheap one off of Amazon because I just was not sure if I would like one. I love it. So, once this one breaks, I will probably buy a nicer one like a Polar. But for now, my cheap HRM (chest strap and watch) are great!

    same here! i bought a midlevel (~$50) HRM from walmart. liking it so far. if it breaks i'll prob go for a polar ft4 or something :)
This discussion has been closed.

Categories