I seriously need help...please!

2»

Replies

  • JDHINAZ
    JDHINAZ Posts: 641 Member
    I agree with msarro......eat more! This sounds so contradictory, but you do have to keep yourself fueled. Someone once posted that it's like gas in a car....you have to keep gas in the car to keep it moving (she said it much more eloquently than I just did) Bottom line, eat more calories. And you can try mixing up when you take in your calories. Try eating a bigger breakfast....it can really get your metabolism going in the morning. As much as what this seems like it's an exact science, it just isn't. You have to keep trying different healthy things. Eating too little isn't one of them, though.

    Keep at it, keep experimenting, DON'T GIVE UP. This isn't the end of the road. You can do it!
  • staclo
    staclo Posts: 511 Member
    OP, are you eating your exercise calories? Also, you should *never* eat less than 1200 calories a day for an extended period of time. Given the amount of exercise you do, you should be feeding yourself more. When you exercise you actually damage your muscles, and damaged muscles need food to repair themselves.

    If you're eating 1100 calories, and then burning 600 calories exercising, that means you've only actually taken in about 500 calories for the day. That's bad - it means your metabolism thinks you're starving, so its slowing itself down to compensate and keep you alive. It's scary to eat more, I know, but in your case you really need to do it. If you have your plan set to lose 2lbs a week, change it to 1lb a week, even 1.5. You need food. When you start eating more, you will most likely gain a few pounds, don't be shocked by this. Your body will take awhile to realize that its not in a famine anymore, and until it does it will try to horde as much as it can as fat, and save all the carbs it can to feed your brain. However that should only last a week or two... afterwards you should notice the weight loss start again.

    My net caloric intake for the past week was 1168. I ate more than that, but with the calories that I burned in exercise, that what the net amount was. I know that I should be netting at least 1200, so I'm at least 32 calories under where I should be (on average). I may need more calories than that, though, I'm not really sure.
  • staclo
    staclo Posts: 511 Member
    Cut your sugar down to <30g. It plays a huge role in metabolism and weight loss.

    :flowerforyou:

    211409.png
    Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Easy Calorie Counting

    I normally do pretty well with sugar, but I have gone over on a few occasions, usually b/c of milk and fruit. I'm watching this...thanks for the suggestion!
  • staclo
    staclo Posts: 511 Member
    I agree with msarro......eat more! This sounds so contradictory, but you do have to keep yourself fueled. Someone once posted that it's like gas in a car....you have to keep gas in the car to keep it moving (she said it much more eloquently than I just did) Bottom line, eat more calories. And you can try mixing up when you take in your calories. Try eating a bigger breakfast....it can really get your metabolism going in the morning. As much as what this seems like it's an exact science, it just isn't. You have to keep trying different healthy things. Eating too little isn't one of them, though.

    Keep at it, keep experimenting, DON'T GIVE UP. This isn't the end of the road. You can do it!

    Thank you for the encouragement! I don't mean to net under 1200, so b/c I caught that, I'm making adjustments. I wonder if I actually need to eat more than a net of 1200 though. I'll have to play with that number a little.

    I eat great breakfasts, actually. That is many times, my largest and healthiest meal of the day. Ack...I'm trying!! :ohwell:
  • staclo
    staclo Posts: 511 Member
    Thank you to everyone who has helped me today! I appreciate it so much!! If anyone has anything else, please feel free to post it here or p.m. me. I'm like a sponge right now, b/c I realize that this is a learning experience, so I'm trying to learn as much as possible!!! :smile:
  • mrsyac2
    mrsyac2 Posts: 2,784 Member
    That is the key to the whole article, having the six meals instead of 3. Now I have no idea how large your meals are, but that is the biggest takeaway from the article. I have known for a long time it is better to eat six small meals than 3 large meals, but I wasn't sure why. This article explains why and it is more than just increasing your metabolism.

    My meals are between 300-400 calories, and my snacks are between 100-200 calories.

    if you are eating 3 meals plus snacks then you are eat 5-6 times a day that is fine.
  • mrsyac2
    mrsyac2 Posts: 2,784 Member
    OP, are you eating your exercise calories? Also, you should *never* eat less than 1200 calories a day for an extended period of time. Given the amount of exercise you do, you should be feeding yourself more. When you exercise you actually damage your muscles, and damaged muscles need food to repair themselves.

    If you're eating 1100 calories, and then burning 600 calories exercising, that means you've only actually taken in about 500 calories for the day. That's bad - it means your metabolism thinks you're starving, so its slowing itself down to compensate and keep you alive. It's scary to eat more, I know, but in your case you really need to do it. If you have your plan set to lose 2lbs a week, change it to 1lb a week, even 1.5. You need food. When you start eating more, you will most likely gain a few pounds, don't be shocked by this. Your body will take awhile to realize that its not in a famine anymore, and until it does it will try to horde as much as it can as fat, and save all the carbs it can to feed your brain. However that should only last a week or two... afterwards you should notice the weight loss start again.

    My net caloric intake for the past week was 1168. I ate more than that, but with the calories that I burned in exercise, that what the net amount was. I know that I should be netting at least 1200, so I'm at least 32 calories under where I should be (on average). I may need more calories than that, though, I'm not really sure.

    when you say net did you go to your reports or something? where it averages out
  • 00Angela00
    00Angela00 Posts: 1,077 Member
    try including measuring yourself as well (waist, thigh, hips, etc) sometimes when your building muscle your weight will stay the same or go up a little before dropping again so measuring yourself sometimes helps you see your progression :-D For me at least the weight isn't the real issue it's how I look. :-D
This discussion has been closed.