Heart Rate Monitor vs. MFP - which calories are accurate?
Options
![schrobecky](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/1870/4862/abad/df87/bb3d/2e4d/2177/ff3eee7489db52c23c2873d656cde120ec3f.jpg)
schrobecky
Posts: 9 Member
MFP, and my MapMyTracks app both say for my ride today that I burned 1250 ish calories... However, my heart rate monitor watch for the same work out says I burned only 900 calories. I am assuming the HRM is more close to my real burn since it is actually measuring me, versus estimating based on height/weight/age... But which do I go with??? Advice please
Thankya!
![:) :)](https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/resources/emoji/smile.png)
0
Replies
-
ahhh ... you answered your own question ... heart rate monitor is more accurate0
-
Always go with the HRM - it knows every beat of the heart and the duration of that rate. Nice ride, though!0
-
HRM for sure. I love mine.0
-
cool.... and dangit!!! ;-)) those extra 300 cals would have been nice! but sticking with the HRM :-) thanks!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 400 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 988 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions