How do you really know how many calories you burned working

hutchy100

I like to do the gym classes how does my fitness pal know how hard i work?

i went to a spin class last night and it said i burnt 400 (i did'nt put my weight, height, age or sex in) but when i put it on myf it said 604 which do i go on

kdjboogs

I had the same problem and what I did is got a HRM watch from Polar. I talked to my trainer friend at the gym and they said to use the number you get from the watch not what is on here or the machines at the gym.

htmlgirl

I think it's better to go with the lower number when it comes to exercises, but if you want to be more accurate then get a heart rate monitor (with a chest strap). I think it's better to overestimate food calories and under estimate exercise calories.

neverstray

Don't get so hung up on it. I got an HRM and found MFP to be very close.

Besides, think about it, how do you know that 300 cals of food burns exactly the same in your body as in mine?

You don't. It's just all a giant guess. Just keep it relative and general and just make sure that you're hitting your goal.

I tell people all the time, it doesn't matter at all if your scale is wrong, as long as you always use the same scale. The same idea applies to calorie burn. It's all relative. The main thing is, are you hitting your goal? If yes, then don't worry about it.

sunshine45356

totally agree....Get a Polar HRM. Makes all the difference!

SarahBarker1987

I don't think you can be exactly right when it comes to working this out. The machines at my gym don't match up to what my pedometer or MFP says. I agree with what htmlgirl says about taking the lowest calculation so that you still stay on track with your weight loss. It wouldn't be very beneficial to take the highest if it wasn't accurate and your weight loss slowed down because you thought you could have a few more calories per day.

hope516

HRM, get it...love it...DONE ! :laugh:

julesg100

I want to get an HRM. I had a Polar and the battery died. I can't get the battery replaced at a watch repair shop since they told me it would not be waterproof.

I still think Polar is the brand I will buy. What model is good for gym workouts and classes? I don't need one that is geared for runners and the foot pod, etc.

Toddrific

MFP uses a best guess. I've always been under the impression it's safe to estimate it at about 20% less.

I recently bought a Polar FT7 and the difference between MFP and the HRM was about 90 calories in an hour of running.

If you are using a machine at the gym and it has weight/height/age it's going to be pretty accurate if it has a way of tracking your HRM.

rosied915

Here, here on the Polar FT7! Get one!

My HRM reading is about HALF what MFP and other calorie burn calculators give me!

If you are going to "eat back" your exercise calories, you should invest in one~ I got mine on Amazon for under $75.

hutchy100

Thanks guys i think il do that

nutrientnatalie

Invest in a heart rate monitor for sure. The machines you work out on are robots really, and so is MFP, so if it says you've burned 600 calories when you've really only burned 100, then you eat 600 extra that you thought you burned off, it will lead to weight gain! Good luck!

nickiebb

Yes, you can get your Polar HRM battery replaced. I got mine replaced at a jeweler. No problem.

nickiebb

I want to get an HRM. I had a Polar and the battery died. I can't get the battery replaced at a watch repair shop since they told me it would not be waterproof.

I still think Polar is the brand I will buy. What model is good for gym workouts and classes? I don't need one that is geared for runners and the foot pod, etc.

Sorry, I meant for you to see my reply. I "quoted" incorrectly. Yes, you can get your HRM battery replaced. I did at a jeweler.

Moonstruk

I feel that if the way you are logging in your food and exercise is working,( i.e. you are losing the lbs), then trust that and know that you're doing it right. If it works, no need to fix it :happy:

neverstray

Before you invest, I bought mine, and MFP is always within about 50 cals + or -. The difference is too small and wasn't worth the investment. The watch was almost $200 and the HRM was around $35. For free, it's close enough. Just something to consider before you spend money.

corys8646

I went with the HRM. I found the treadmill to be pretty close to what the HRM reported, but the elliptical machine was reporting about 30% more calories burned than actual.

Anymore I just figure it's about 10 calories per minute for moderate intensity (you will have to the judge on that) I ignore the machines and don't really bother with the HRM. I will slap it on from time to time just to double check.