We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

using exercise as a sole calories burner

sabrekism
sabrekism Posts: 113 Member
edited December 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
hello folks hows is it hanging? :D

what do u guys think of the approach of using exercising as a sole calories burner and in the calories intake corner we only eat the "maintain" level of food intake and only using exercise as the progress wheel ?

reason for this is beacause im a loser when it comes to cut calories intake but i can maintain no problem and also im welling to kick butt in the Gym and so on.

u guys think this might work? and what are the cons and pros of this method?

thx in advance

Replies

  • DonM46
    DonM46 Posts: 772 Member
    There are some on this site who advocate that approach.
    That the calorie intake be established at a maintenance level and accomplish the calorie deficit through exercise.
    In theory, it should work.
    MFP says to establish a calorie deficit by limiting the diet, then 'eat back' the calories burned.
    As long as there is a net calorie reduction of about 3500 per week, you should lose a pound.
    Mathematically, either approach should work.
    I lost my weight by reducing intake alone. I'm physically unable to exercise, so deficit through intake was my sole option.
  • cellokitty91
    cellokitty91 Posts: 127 Member
    Sounds like a solid plan. Cardio burns calories pretty quickly and as long as you're eating healthy you'll see results.
This discussion has been closed.